posted on Jun, 25 2011 @ 12:54 AM
Originally posted by dalloway
Pffft. Doesn't matter what you scramble up to use as your supposed slippery slope and causal connection, those two techniques are still just not
even useful for a freshman debater. Presenting your major points and then presenting some solid pieces of data to back up those beliefs would be much
more in line with what would be expected from a skilled debater. The use of words and phrases designed to frighten or provoke an emotional response
but have no foundation in fact, is junior varsity all the way. I thought you were a more advanced debater than that, CC.
It's been fun, but I'm done for the night. Thanks for the conversation. Have a pleasant tomorrow.
I never said anything to frighten anyone, but you on the other hand rode right in here posing as some master debater without one shred of logic or a
single example to support your position. I said nothing to provoke an emotional response, but stated factually, that anything which can be said to
support gay marriage could also be used to support other forms of marriage not condoned by society, and by example I listed incest, and polygamy.
You can try to patronize me all you like with your unsubstantiated aloofness, but you only reveal how weak your position is by doing so.
Now can you give me one example why gay marriage should be allowed, but polygamy or incest should not be allowed by law?