'Major Result' on Sunspot Cycle to be Announced Tuesday , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 115 times
Topic started on 14-6-2011 @ 02:01 AM by aarys
sc25.com...

I see there is going to be a major annoucement Tuesday about our solar cycle. Is this announcement from nasa? Anyone know. Maybe they might say that the flares have got a connection to these volcanos. Who knows.



Please read how to Start a New Thread:
AboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count.
Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread.
If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events,
or important information from other sites;
*please post one or two paragraphs,
*a link to the entire story,
*AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item,
as a means to inspire discussion or collaborative research on your subject.
edit on June 18th 2011 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 14-6-2011 @ 02:19 AM by OnlyLove
reply to post by aarys



Some more info on it
www.space.com...
www.solarham.com...

I wonder what this 'major result' is, will keep an eye out.
Thanks
edit on 14/6/2011 by OnlyLove because: (no reason given)
edit on 14/6/2011 by OnlyLove because: i can't spell grrr



reply posted on 14-6-2011 @ 03:48 AM by LexiconV
reply to post by Chadwickus



Yup... the sun's conveyor belts have elongated and have been sticking together and now it has lost its cyclic memory.



Or maybe they have finally interpreted the pure hydrogen hicups.
edit on 14-6-2011 by LexiconV because: added theory of hicups




reply posted on 14-6-2011 @ 04:02 AM by backinblack
Originally posted by Chadwickus
Well clearly it's related to the length of this solar minimum.

Have a feeling it will be something to do with the suns 'conveyor belt'

www.universetoday.com...

edit on 14/6/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)


Or maybe the end of the minimum..
I heard here the other day there was a huge flare that may effect equipment at both poles..
The biggest in 20 so they said..
edit on 14-6-2011 by backinblack because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 14-6-2011 @ 04:18 AM by Chadwickus
reply to post by backinblack



We've only had an M class flare in the last few weeks and that one ended up missing us.

Not that it would have done a lot anyway.

It's funny, the article (August 2010) I linked to mentions how the sun is close to waking up and then reading the article in the OP the sun is still close to waking up.

Think the conveyor needs some oil.


reply posted on 14-6-2011 @ 04:20 AM by backinblack
reply to post by Chadwickus



Odd, I listen to ABC radio and it was only a few days ago that I heard what I mentioned.

ABC is usually pretty credible..


reply posted on 14-6-2011 @ 04:31 AM by Chadwickus
reply to post by backinblack



Weird, there was no big flare recently and certainly not biggest in 20 years.


reply posted on 14-6-2011 @ 04:37 AM by backinblack
reply to post by Chadwickus



Here ya go, but here it says biggest in 5 years..
Though I guarantee the radio said 20.

An unusual solar flare observed by a NASA space observatory could cause some disruptions to satellite communications and power on Earth over the next day or so, officials said.

www.abc.net.au...

This was dated 8th June so I guess that's what they were talking about.

edit; They may have said the "effects" would be the worst in 20 years..
edit on 14-6-2011 by backinblack because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 8 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 3 days ago with 63 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 16 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 13 days ago with 46 member flags
Indian state says it\'s OK now to kill tiger poachers on sight
  Posted 5 days ago with 41 member flags