reply to post by hawkiye
I am only a partial proponent of EU (i must strongly stress that, actually), but i did post in another thread regarding this. that post was
completely off topic as it was in the march 31st prediction thread (wasnt aware of this one until hawk posted in the other). This type of theory
doesnt really have
to involve the EU hypothesis either... In either case, the question remains, if elenin is the cause, why dont other comets
have the same effect? I think there could be many reasons, but the easiest explanation would be that it had a material makeup that is either
inherently highly magnetic, or became highly magnetized due to some process.
I had begun thinking about this when i was presented with the information a few months ago. As i work with EM here and there, it should be obvious
why i took a bit of an interest in this topic.
i also posted another post
, but was in a bit more of a ranting mood. They both cover slightly
different parts of the same grounds though. This post was just focusing on some patterns i found while messing with the jpl sim.
if it is
elenin that is a catalyst for certain events, then there would be reasons for it. To explore the sun-earth-elenin theory, im not so
sure we would be looking at an element of gravity specifically, so there would be other hypotheses including magnetism. We are still working on
theories as far as how solar activity (from any source) affects this planet. We know at the very least, magnetic anomalies can present themselves
around the time and location of an earthquake. We have two events that exhibit a possible emerging pattern with very large earthquakes, as well as
many great unknowns about earthquakes themselves (and of course the universe as a whole!). The two most relevant periods of time in the past are,
roughly, february 26 - march 3, 2010 and march 11 through 19, 2011. the magnetic field would have to be strong, but if it were
to have a
strong magnetic interaction, it would more likely be around those dates as two very strong magnetic forces (sun/elenin) can tug/pull equally on a
weaker one (earth). It might be interesting to figure out how japan and chile were oriented in regards to the sun and elenin on the dates of the
However, we are not necessarily looking at "alignments" for a bit now and i think this might be the basis of this girl wanting to get her family out
of california in general for the march 31st prediction. if
it is elenin causing these things, i would suspect around mid august, we would
start to see increased effects as it closes in past 1 AU, at a greatly accelerated pace. We would get a sun-elenin-earth alignment (note the order)
around sep 27, 2011. Though, such an alignment may not be as relevant as the close distance, or a sun-earth-elenin alignment. Oct 15-19 will be when
it is closest to earth (.232 AU on oct 17), and the specific effect it will have (if it is indeed a such a magnetic object) will depend entirely on
orientation of the magnetic fields of the earth and elenin. it would be possible elenin does not have a stable rotation of its magnetic field as
well. Around november 5, we will cross the tail of elenin, then pretty quickly go into another sun-earth-elenin alignment starting around Nov 20
through 28 2011. The final alignment will be around Dec 21-29 2012, and past that we would, assumedly, be out of its theoretical magnetic field.
Now for true
speculation! the first alignment date of 2010, it was roughly 6 AU from earth. This would place a lower limit on the size of the
magnetic field of elenin at roughly 6 AU. That is the most "reasonable" number we will get, haha, so lets work with that. Now, if this object would
also have an effect when it came within 6 AU of the sun, which would have started around Jun 10, 2010. this would likely have manifested in a
increase in solar activity from our sun, though i have not looked into that date for that.. The sun would be within this magnetic field until about
december 2012. Earth would be contained in this ~6AU magnetic field from about feb 26, 2010 to may 1, 2010. then again starting sep 21, 2010 to Feb
12, 2013. This magnetic field may also explain the increased feeling of "doom" by some, "ascension" by others, and all around restlessness all
around (like that statement?
), as well as the malfunctioning compasses and such. It might also cause things like lights and batteries to "go"
with greater frequency than they have in the recent past. It is obviously all just a postulation that may end up being false (likely), but hey, thats
what its all about right?
If patterns start to exhibit, we must explore them regardless of if it challenges our current understanding or not! I
did find it interesting how this girl described magnetic events with pretty good detail, while obviously not being educated on the matter. she said
angels told her, but google can do that too..
Well, that was definitely the most i have looked into it thus far
It was all just using the
. I typed this randomly throughout the day, so im sure something has issues
with continuity. If elenin is an object of unknown make-up and is the catalyst for these events, it will only become clear through further
observation. the veracity of the theory has nothing to do with the validity of the predictions though, that will be determined individually and a
whole lot sooner, also through observation. I actually do not necessarily feel elenin is the cause of any of this, but i am more than willing to
explore a valid possibility based on emergent patterns, regardless of the context under which it is presented.
I sent a u2u to someone detailing a bit about an earthquake test platform, but i feel its relevant here too and perhaps even of interest (if you can
get past my gating mechanism of verbosity
I have long suspected that in the tension before an ensuing quake, there would be specific magnetic anomalies. the only issue is data collection and
pattern emergence. i though about building a specific test platform for this? would be interesting to see what a scale model would elucidate. it could
basically be two test mediums to represent plates in various ways. then test it with a strong magnetic field penetrating it (as a magnet under the
medium, measured above the medium), and also test it as the two plates acting as electro-magnets. As the test mediums build pressure, one would
monitor the em fields present around the entire test platform for any changes and patterns that may occur leading up to, during, and after a simulated
quake. if the idea behind the testing platform is able to represent real world mechanics, at least from a pattern standpoint, then applied in a little
different manner, it could test for elenin as well.
I dont know how much anyone knows about magnets, but i dont need to go too in depth to explain one of my hypotheses. So, when you have say, three
magnets, the one in the center will prefer to be opposing to the ones on the outside. If you create a line of magnets that are linked, they will want
to switch polarities back and forth with each magnet. I have suspected that when the earth is that center magnetic field between two very strong
magnets (like the sun and "x") then depending on the orientation of those magnetic fields, the earths field will want to flip its polarity. or, at the
very least move around. This magnetic influence would likely affect everything from mass distribution to possibly even plate movement.
The testing platform could also test how an outside strong magnetic influence, of varying polarity differences, would affect a "close-by" magnetic
field, and the things contained within it (plate movement, specifically).
Something like that would allow for repeated testing, and if designed properly, not just for em patterns.
Either way, mid october will be a phenomal time to do some celestial body watching
edit on 30-3-2011 by sinohptik because: something about