It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wewillallbefree
Another thing people should be asking themselves, the media seemed to right in the mix when it was happening, from the data I've seen the quake hit at 2:46, and news choppers were on site at 3pm, does that not seem a little fast?
then why was greta not surprised or even react to that guy the expert with the geological survey saying 9.1 ?
Originally posted by 00nunya00
reply to post by GullibleUnderlord
I don't think there's a conspiracy there. US agency says 8.9, Fox is going to stick with the Americans. They have much better proof and info about it now.
Chernobyl was effectively in a large metal shed (filtered confinement building) completely different than Western powerplants
Chernobyl was a bad design with bad containment operated out of spec by Soviets. Not applicable to Western power reactors.
No matter what happens it won't be as bad as Chernobyl, no way, no how. We have to wait & see & we have some time.
Chernobyl had a solid graphite core with pressure tubes containing fuel and no containment building. This plant is a can in a can