It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We can state with a 97% certainty that we have on our hands chemical trails (chemtrails) comprised by fine dust containing polymers and metals, used to disrupt radar signals. This is their main purpose, but I was surprised that this artificial cloud was so wide-spread. The radar images are stunning considering the needed tons of dispersed elements. Although, the federal army claims that only small amounts of material were propagated. The military heads claim that the substances used are not harmful.
Raytheon buys Applied Signal Technology Company processes communications signals for intelligence missions By David Hubler Dec 20, 2010 Raytheon Co. has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Applied Signal Technology Inc., a processor of communications signals for tactical and strategic intelligence missions, for $38 a share in cash, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $490 million.
After successful completion of the transaction, which is expected in the first quarter of 2011, Applied Signal will be integrated into Raytheon's Space and Airborne Systems business. Applied Signal is based in Sunnyvale, Calif.
There seems to be no disagreement or large argument among those few individuals who oppose the belief that "chemtrails" actually exist. That the technology, the methods, the motives and the means to develop and carry out a project like "chemtrails" is out there and already exists. The only disagreement seems to lie in whether it actually is or has been being used or not. And also of the fact that most if not all of the persistent contrails seen by the public and are most notably being called "chemtrails" have absolutely no connection to the real technology and the probable ways that that technology would actually be being used and implemented. Even though they admittingly agree that that technology already exists. Please correct me if I have this wrong.
OK look, I supplied my evidence, which is the document from earlier, way before you decided to come in here with your video to distract the current evidence I'm offering up for evaluation. No one from the contrail side of this seems to want to comment or discuss whats in that document. The challenge is simple.... I will look at and evaluate your video later.......But first, I want one person to accept my challenge to go through this document line by line and page by page to interpret the information contained within this document. We will use the glossary provided and others sources to define to meaning of the information. It should be an even and fair debate ..meaning no teams of 3 against 1, with all the usual distractions from others and no changing the subject until the entire document has been mutually agreed upon what the interpretation should be. If certain parts can not be defined clearly to the satisfaction of both persons. Then we will set those items aside into a separate column for larger group debate. Anyone willing to accept this challenge ? Here is the document....www.usgcrp.gov... signature:
Soon I will catch the big fish and reel you in.
Is ATS Supporting Ignorance Concerning Chemtrails? I think so.
edit on 3/4/2011 by 12m8keall2c because: (no reason given)