posted on Feb, 3 2011 @ 03:07 PM
let me give you an example:
here in the usa, we voted to balance the equation by giving preferential hiring to minorities.
this allowed more blacks, native americans, orientals, semites (of various kinds), and hispanics, to get first dibs at
jobs in areas where they were represented.
in south africa, they voted to do away with apartheid to equalize the playing field, allowing more blacks to get in the work place. they did this by
firing white people and replacing them with black workers. however, white people are the minority. and they will be restricted from getting most
jobs until the equation is balanced. since 80% of south africa is unemployed blacks, the entirety of the white population will eventually be without
this indicates that being a white minority works against you in the current global mindset, and it works against you if you are in a white majority.
either way, the plan is to get rid of poverty for people who have been impoverished historically, by starving the white people to death, be they
minority or majority, matters not
pure democracies exacerbate this by making final decisions based on the votes of the majority. when the majority can vote away the rights and lives
of the minority, expect countries where whites are minorities to vote against whites (no representative republic eventually equals genocide of one
kind or another). if the usa becomes a pure democracy with its current laws, the minorities will form a majority and vote away the rights and lives
of the minority). whoever is behind all this, knows that and has every intention of carrying it out, thinking they will escape the genocides. they
are wrong. even now the blacks of south africa are starting to say that the few whites who do have money and jobs in south africa, are also in
control of the media and banks. and ya know how that ends up.
edit on 3-2-2011 by undo because: (no reason given)