It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ararisq
I want someone to raise the point that he said we were giving subsidies to oil companies and to banks and that by ending those subsidies we would be able to subsidize new programs for new technology. My question - if that were true, and the Democrats had a super-majority in congress and the presidency since Jan 2009 why did they not think to end those subsidies in the past 2 years - why during that speech do we suddenly learn of it?
Overall, I thought he did a good job - lots of smoke suitable for 5-10 second clips on the news and I'm sure that tons of Americans will eat it up. It was completely disingenuous though - I didn't hear one thing that would lead me to believe that I will be leaving a better America for my children.
He said that times have changed and we have to accept that our industrial jobs are gone. My Question - Where did they go? It seems to me they went to China and India - the countries suddenly in position to compete with us. His answer - accept it and move on, focus on high technology jobs.
:
The 2009 US GDP composition by sector shows the following:
Agriculture : 1.9%
Industry : 21.9%
Services: 76.9%
This is a disaster in the making. The entire economy now hinges upon the fact that the USD is the world reserve currency - take that away which is only a matter of time not if, and the service sector is going to collapse. It isn't about what he said in the SOTU, its about what he didn't say, what none of them have said for 50 years. His plans signal the death knell for the US.
Originally posted by ararisq
Originally posted by Vortiki
He was doing alot of talking on bringing governmental groups together and "redesigning" government. If you ask me this sounds like steps in the direction of globalism. It starts with the combining of various government run groups such as the CIA and the FBI, next thing you know there's UPU2 everywhere.
I heard the exact same thing we he brought up that we have a government rooted in the past. I think the underlying meaning was (a) that the founding principles do not apply any longer and (b) that he wants the reigns to completely redesign the government in his image. I don't disagree with him though that the government has done a piss poor job and needs to be reformed I just want those useless and overstepping agencies to be eliminated - he wants them consolidated, strengthened, and controlled along the lines of the DHS - that worked out real well for us lowly citizens.
Originally posted by General.Lee
This was typical Obama style. First, he separated the parties to make it more "bipartisan". What this translates to is, "I love partisanship when my party is in control, otherwise I'm going to silence it".
This clown completely ignored the will of the people and the Republican party before the election. The people overwhelmingly rejected his healthcare and he rammed it through. He created an unprecedented number of czar positions and filled them with partisan hangers-on and extremists, (think Van Jones). Quite simply, he was as partisan and stubborn as any president I've ever seen, and NOW he wants everybody to play nice.
Originally posted by BlackOps719
reply to post by Logarock
Or maybe the Chinese business executives can travel on our beautiful scenic high speed rail system as they shop around for cheap land and homes to purchase at bargain discount prices.
The future doesn't look bad at all
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by ararisq
Originally posted by Vortiki
Anyway this was a speech. Reminded me of another speech. A famous guy said once...."it puts the lotion on its skin of else it gets the hose again".
So, Obama's State of The Union speech reminded you of a fictional serial killer?
Strange.....edit on 26-1-2011 by marker3221 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by marker3221
reply to post by ladyinwaiting
I agree. I also noticed John Boehner's face when Obama said he wanted to cut the cash going to the oil companies. Old John wasn't happy with that one at all, I wonder why?
Clearly bought & paid for.
Originally posted by sodakota
I didn't watch it... Does that make me a bad person?
I haven't watched him since I found out about the teleprompter.
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
I thought it was brilliant, and the delivery was flawless.
His genuineness in his desire to help the country is there for anyone who opens their eyes to see.
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
Originally posted by sodakota
I didn't watch it... Does that make me a bad person?
I haven't watched him since I found out about the teleprompter.
In that case, I'm guessing you never watched Bush's speeches...Ever.
I don't blame you. Watching that guy try to speak was more devastating than watching the WTC fall down.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
I wonder if he'll be using anything from my own past vision for the future
Originally posted by NewAgeMan (posted back in November 2010)
Had I been POTUS instead of Cheney/Bush, this would have been my thinking:
INSTEAD of making a run at the throne of the earth ie: global geostrategic hegemony, by authorizing the muder of 3000 of my own constituents, in order to wage resource and domination wars as per the PNAC (with a soft c) recommendations, and sacrificing another million innocent souls in the process to a Satanic doctrine..
..I would have looked into the future of the 21st century and noted that the whole world was on the very cusp of entering the technological age, and on the basis that we had a severe CRISIS on our hands, in education and technological innovation, and were about to lose our competitive edge in an increasingly competitive global marketplace, I would have spent that TWO TRILLION dollars on all manner of infrastructure, including a REAL information superhighway in the form of terrabit bandwidth fiber optic cabling to every school and home in the country, as well as various Civil Infrastructure initiatives, including high speed and light commutor rail corridors between all the major urban centers, improving dramatically the speed of exchange of people and goods and services, as well as the continued joy of community living, or a MAJOR national upgrade in other words, on par with JFK's landing on the moon initiative.
Then we could have turnedd our attention to the Education System, recognizing that our HUMAN INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL development, is indeed our greatest national asset and latant potentiality, for securing a vital edge within the larger context of an emerging global civilization / global village.
In other words, I would have tried to discern and do the will of God, instead of Satan, simple as that.
I honestly think there might have been GIVEN the wrong blueprint for success by the wrong people, people like Cheney, Bush Sr. and their ilk. &/or whoever they take their marching orders from..
May there be weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth...