It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by heineken
reply to post by stereologist
yawwwwwwwwwwwwnn
cant you see the years you are posting ?
in this thread we are speaking of
1st January 2011
2nd January 2011
3rd January 2011
4th January 2011
5th January 2011
6th January 2011
7th January 2011
8th January 2011
9th January 2011
10th January 2011
11th January 2011
12th January 2011
13th January 2011
14th January 2011
15th January 2011
16th January 2011
17th January 2011
18th January 2011
19th January 2011
please read the thread from the beginning till the end again thank you stereologist , if you agree with the thread kindly flag it so others may get interested
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by dnvrliz
Planet X was spotted back in 1984 and was covered up.....believe what you want !!! Everyone has a different take on this, mine is that I believe in Planet X....we can agree to disagree !!!
That's not true at all. Back in 1984 the IRAS data was being reviewed and some objects were detected in infrared, but there was no counterpart on plates taken in visible light. This part of the newspaper article came from a statement by one of the astronomers:
So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a
nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that
it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the
light cast by its stars ever gets through.
The object turned out to be a new type of galaxy. It wasn't a part of the solar system. In fact, none of the unknown celestial objects turned out to be part of our solar system.
Read the newspaper article here:
Possibly as Large as Jupiter; Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered
Here is another place about the IRAS data:
IRAS
The observatory also made headlines briefly with the discovery of an "unknown object" that was at first described as "possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system." However, further analysis revealed that, of several unidentified objects, nine were distant galaxies and the tenth was "intergalactic cirrus". None were found to be Solar System bodies.
The claim of a 1984 cover up is nonsense. At no time was a new planet observed.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by heineken
and we can confirm this not only by the stars awarded
You think this is a popularity contest? You think some stars are meaningful? That's really low brow thinking. You probably don't have any idea how many people are laughing at your ineptness. You claim to be untouchable, but really the video and its contents stink.
Your first movie was bad, really, really bad. It contained nothing except mistakes.
So far no one in this thread has posted any evidence at all to substantiated the claim that floods are more recent. All that has been done is to post a laundry list, a rather incomplete list, of some floods with no effort to show that this represents any sort of increase.
You still refuse to understand or acknowledge the difference between a pole shift and a magnetic reversal. So the following statement is a falsehood isn't it?
and i aint gonna trust any scientist out there because I KNOW THEY DONT KNOW WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON..neither you...and neither me...and i will keep looking for answers
You say you are looking for answers, yet you are avoiding getting even the basics right. How can you find answers if you can't get even the most trivial concepts right? The simple answer is you can't.
(Do you agree with the Mass Suicide??..seriously..answer me dude..dont run away from this question)
What is your question? Do I agree with mass suicides? What sort of a question is that? I realize that English is a second language for you and I admire people that are able to use English as well as you do when it is not their first language. But, I don't understand your question. Please clarify what you are asking. If this has anything to do with the video I didn't bother to watch the video since you never stated why it was included in your post.
Originally posted by dnvrliz
Originally posted by heineken
reply to post by stereologist
yawwwwwwwwwwwwnn
cant you see the years you are posting ?
in this thread we are speaking of
1st January 2011
2nd January 2011
3rd January 2011
4th January 2011
5th January 2011
6th January 2011
7th January 2011
8th January 2011
9th January 2011
10th January 2011
11th January 2011
12th January 2011
13th January 2011
14th January 2011
15th January 2011
16th January 2011
17th January 2011
18th January 2011
19th January 2011
please read the thread from the beginning till the end again thank you stereologist , if you agree with the thread kindly flag it so others may get interested
And we are not only looking at many such occurrences in a short time frame, but the fact that they are in so many different geological locations at the very same time.
There are sites that I have found that are very scientific and they are taking this die off and all the earth changes very seriously.. One site being "Earth Changes and Pole Shift" - Go there!!! Learn something....you naysayers, Carry on Heineken !!! we very much await your informative posts.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Laurauk
These sorts of events where large groups of wildlife die off are not rare events. They happen. Usually only whale beachings are reported in the news. Then again the news gets on a fad and reports similar events for whatever reason giving the false impression that something is up.
From 2002 its carbs, fish www.thefreelibrary.com...
From 1998 its jellyfish en.wikipedia.org...-off
From 1997 its pelagic birds www.pmel.noaa.gov...
Looking around quickly I found these die offs.
I wanted an older event to toss in and I did a search for bird die-offs 1963 and found the following report.
www2.nbc4i.com...
"In the '60s, there was a roost of up to a million blackbirds on the OSU campus of all places, right here in Columbus, Ohio, and in 1963 they were hit by a severe cold, wet rainstorm," McCormac said. "There was many, many thousands of blackbirds that died there due to natural weather phenomena."
These are not new events. They happen and will continue to happen.
And we are not only looking at many such occurrences in a short time frame, but the fact that they are in so many different geological locations at the very same time.
There are sites that I have found that are very scientific and they are taking this die off and all the earth changes very seriously.. One site being "Earth Changes and Pole Shift" - Go there!!! Learn something....you naysayers, Carry on Heineken !!! we very much await your informative posts.
There is so much information out there that it is almost impossible to decipher the truth from fiction. You could read about this for days and have hundreds of different answers and conclusions. Who do we believe in the end ? There are rebuttals on the rebuttals, and on and on. Take all the information about any topic, hash it around and then go with your gut, because that is the only truth you will get, it is like that with anything. Things are put out by very reliable sources only to be found that they were wrong somewhere down the road, who can you believe except your own feelings on the subject. If you are of sane mind you are usually best to go with your first instinct. Maybe I am a little too new age for you but it has always worked for me. You can no longer believe what you hear, what you read, or what you even see, but you can always believe your gut.....
Read the book "Alternative 3", it will make you think about things differently!!!
As far as English being a second language in Malta, look it up, ALL Maltese speak English and to some or most it is a first language, it has been this way for many decades.....
The Eurobarometer states that 100% of the population speak Maltese. Also, 88% of the population speak English, 66% speak Italian, and 17% speak French.
I do still find it strange that everything that has happend this month seems to be happening all at once. So that begs the question, why is it happening and why is it happening so suddenly?
"This thing had not been seen by scientific eyes until last year," he said.
specimens of the unknown rodent were discovered in a local market being sold for food.
If the scientists don't even know that their were these larger creatures living in Tennessee in the middle of the United States of America, how are they, or you guys, going to prove to me the we 100% know anything.
SO, yesterday we could have been in a thread titled "Youtube video on mytholigcal crayfish". One side would have said, "there is no proof of such a thing", and the other side would have said, "but we believe".
And then today, the believers would have been vindicated, and the scientific spewing side would have gone 'oops'.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by lasertaglover
There are no two sides of scientists in this thread. It is a case of unwarranted and unsubstantiated speculations and bad guesswork vs scientific evidence to the contrary.
It should be pointed out that this new species of crayfish was known, but not recognized as a separate species.
"This thing had not been seen by scientific eyes until last year," he said.
-Hmmm..this species was known? Ahhh, your quote from my quote says "had not been seen by scientific eyes until last year". Unless you mean that has been known since last year. So you are a flat out wrong here, and just arguing to argue, and doing what you claim everyone else does, and that is, missing the point.
This is not uncommon. The recently "discovered" rock rat in Laos was known to locals, but not to scientists.
Rodent Discovered in Laos Defines New Family of Mammals
specimens of the unknown rodent were discovered in a local market being sold for food.
-I obviously agree that this is not uncommon, which is my POINT. We, you, me, and the scientists do NOT know lots of things!!
If the scientists don't even know that their were these larger creatures living in Tennessee in the middle of the United States of America, how are they, or you guys, going to prove to me the we 100% know anything.
This creature has probably been seen countless times, but not recognized as a new species. That's not unusual. There are times when a known species is difficult to identify due to odd colorations. This happens with birds all of the time. Raptors that are in dark phases are often difficult to identify. Is it a new species or a difficult to identify individual of a known species? I recall trying to identify a bird with a black head and red body. I was sure this was an escaped exotic. I spent hours going through books on birds from around the world only to later realize that this was a sick or injured cardinal that had lost its head feathers.
The fact that there is more to learn is exciting and does not mean that unrelated issues are not well known. For example, the new species does not affect the issue of whether or not flooding is more common. What this discovery probably means is that the world of crayfish is more interesting than previously thought.
-And you miss my point again here, that science is an evolving field, our knowledge base grows as we learn and discover more, or sometimes by simply putting things into a different perspective. Quite frankly, I agree with your idea that the number of floods has not increased. The issue is not in the frequency, the issue, for me at least, is that our population has never ever been so large, which means that while the number of floods may not be increasing, it is a FACT that the amount of people being affected by them has increased tremendously. Same with the dead animals. The number may not be increasing, but that more people are seeing these die-offs first-hand, and in a world that does currently have food shortages in some countries, it makes people nervous. Insulting others, even when mixed with good data, does not fix the problem of hysteria, it re-enforces those that refuse to see the data. You Sir, are actually making the problem worse.
SO, yesterday we could have been in a thread titled "Youtube video on mytholigcal crayfish". One side would have said, "there is no proof of such a thing", and the other side would have said, "but we believe".
It's not proof, it's evidence that people look for. These are very different. To believe without evidence is in my opinion weird. That does not mean that the evidence might be limited such as an unexplained set of marks left by a predator or scavenger. That could be used to predict the size and type of creature involved. That could lead to answering the question of whether or not a new species exists.
And then today, the believers would have been vindicated, and the scientific spewing side would have gone 'oops'.
That is a misrepresentation of what happens. The scientific side goes from looking for evidence to using the evidence. This is a good moment, not an ooops. It leads a better understanding of the world around us. That's a cause for celebration, not saying oops.
-And I agree here as well, but again you miss the point. It would be cause for the scientific community to celebrate, but would they turn around and go 'OOPS' to the believer crowd? Nope, and you know it. But, this is not a misrepresentation at all. It is an over simplified look at the way this world works, and how you yourself have taken issue with the people on this thread.
You might try learning a little more about what scientists do. I think you have a vague idea, but don't understand how science is a self correcting system.
Originally posted by Laurauk
reply to post by lasertaglover
That is why I keep comming back to ATS, you can have a frank discussion, (without the flaming or demonising, another member). And read or learn ideas, information you havnt thought about before.
Originally posted by lasertaglover
I am still loving how everyone goes back and forth quoting one scientist or another to prove a point.
We ATS'ers are all here to debate topics back and forth, and hopefully to learn something from the reasearch that is presented. However, just like the debate that is being waged back and forth in this thread, each side insists that they know everything because of all of the documented evidence from these 'all-konwing' scientists.
BUT, when I see an article like I read today on Yahoo, it brings me back to my orginal post on this thread of how much these arguments really crack me up and make me laugh.
Again, I am not laughing at anyone in particular, and I mean that. I just find it super amusing how strong both sides believe in something when the fact is that both the community here on ATS, and the scienitfic community still really only understand a little bit about this planet that we share.
Even though it is not exactly related to this thread, the article that I mentioned highlights my point very well. Maybe it is just me and my overly cynical mind, but I do not trust either side telling the so-called truth.
If the scientists don't even know that their were these larger creatures living in Tennessee in the middle of the United States of America, how are they, or you guys, going to prove to me the we 100% know anything.
The Yahoo article:
news.yahoo.com...
"WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A new species of giant crayfish literally crawled out from under a rock in Tennessee, proving that large new species of animals can be found in highly populated and well-explored places, researchers said on Wednesday.
The new crayfish should not have been easily overlooked, as it is huge -- twice the size of other species, the team at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Eastern Kentucky University said."
SO, yesterday we could have been in a thread titled "Youtube video on mytholigcal crayfish". One side would have said, "there is no proof of such a thing", and the other side would have said, "but we believe".
And then today, the believers would have been vindicated, and the scientific spewing side would have gone 'oops'.
SO, keep on having your debate and making me smile.
I hope both sides on this thread keep it up, because the bottom line is that it does not matter at all. You can get hit by a bus tomorrow, or a 9.0 earthquake the day after, or maybe you might even die from having a giant flock of birds die in the sky and crush ya!
My advice to all of you is to go out and make a child smile somewhere, play with some Lego's, be uber-productive in this society and make lots of money, and always have a when TSHTF bag packed and ready to go.
Carry on with the debate my friends, but always remember to maintain dignity, and no matter where you live in the world, TROLLS suck!
Have a great day!
I think people call you a troll because of your rudeness
So back at you, "I think you have a vague idea of how to communicate with others and how to get an important point across, but you don't understand how you really come off so rudely."
Or, you probably don't care how rude you are, which is your absolute right.
Using contempt or arrogrance never wins an argument or debate.
You obviously are very passionate about your own knowledge base, it is a shame that you do not know how to communicate it without degrading other people.
Your "You might try learning...blah blah" post is amazingly contradictory to the valid points that you do make, and in a eduacted debate, has no place.