It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Have you actually read the bible all the way through???
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by WalterRatlos
A logical fallacy? Isn't that an oxymoron? What is this? Scrabble anyone ? Somekind of word game?
How about one of you bums rewrite the friggen thing for me? From the same perposterous view point.
Ad hominem circumstantial
Ad hominem circumstantial points out that someone is in circumstances such that he is disposed to take a particular position. Ad hominem circumstantial constitutes an attack on the bias of a source. This is fallacious because a disposition to make a certain argument does not make the argument false; this overlaps with the genetic fallacy (an argument that a claim is incorrect due to its source).[citation needed] Where the source taking a position seeks to convince us by a claim of authority, or personal observation, observation of their circumstances may reduce the evidentiary weight of the claims, sometimes to zero.[4]
Examples: Mandy Rice-Davies's famous testimony during the Profumo Affair, "Well, he would [say that], wouldn't he?", is an example of a valid circumstantial argument. Her point was that since a man in a prominent position, accused of an affair with a callgirl, would deny the claim whether it was true or false, his denial, in itself, carries little evidential weight against the claim of an affair. Note, however, that this argument is valid only insofar as it devalues the denial; it does not bolster the original claim. To construe evidentiary invalidation of the denial as evidentiary validation of the original claim is fallacious (on several different bases, including that of argumentum ad hominem); however likely the man in question would be to deny an affair that did in fact happen, he could only be more likely to deny an affair that never did.
reply to post by awake_and_aware
You must be a troll.
Originally posted by FPB214
reply to post by impaired
This is why I dont follow religions. Many, many people get so caught up in believing every single word in their text's that they hate others for not believing, they put them down, cause violence, and in the end ar as far away from their God as can be. Because if there God is real, it wouldn't want them to be negative and affect another human negatively because of different beliefs. It kinda ruins the whole point of the text's. To me religion is the downfall of man, considering their are too many problems that come with it that out-weigh the good. That's why I claim spirituality.
And I see I'm on ignore or something. Does that mean I won the argument?
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by FPB214
So I take it you're not going to edit that solid block of letters then? So I can read it with out getting a head ache.? No biggy most likely nothing of substance in it anyway. Thanks for your cooperation.
There it goes . Thank you! very much.edit on 29-12-2010 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by impaired
Sick. Absolutely sick and twisted.
You have no idea.
On a side note and to try and alleviate some of the anger between us before I go,
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by impaired
On a side note and to try and alleviate some of the anger between us before I go,
Oh ! Well I see no reason for you to start being a lady at this point.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by impaired
lmao