I think the reason they cut the hair in the military is for hygeine purposes.


maybe the power is truly in
facial hair!
From a yogic perspective, hair is an amazing gift of nature that can actually help raise the Kundalini energy (creative life force), which increases vitality, intuition, and tranquility.
The bones in the forehead are porous and function to transmit light to the pineal gland, which affects brain activity, as well as thyroid and sexual hormones. Cutting the hair into bangs, which cover the forehead impedes this process. When Genghis Khan conquered China, he considered the Chinese to be a very wise, intelligent people who would not allow themselves to be subjugated. He therefore required all women in the country to cut their hair and wear bangs, because he knew this would serve to keep them timid and more easily controlled.
In addition, hairs are the antennas that gather and channel the sun energy or prana to the frontal lobes, the part of the brain you use for meditation and visualization. These antennas act as conduits to bring you greater quantities of subtle, cosmic energy. It takes approximately three years from the last time your hair was cut for new antennas to form at the tips of the hair.

Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by onehuman
I fail to see how the amount of hair has anything to do with people's skill in combat. The entire human body is covered with hair, some people are more hairy simply by nature so are they suggesting that none of them can be good at fighting or tracking? Are they suggesting that a bald person can never be an excellent soldier? I mean this is just stupid. And why would the government cover it up![]()
I'm sorry but it just comes off as a lot of hogwash and then to bring up the Bible story at the end, I mean come on, as if that's going to add weight to it. I suppose if that story is true than so is the one about the talking snake![]()
I wouldn't mind seeing some scientific studies being done on this though, there might be some correlation of some kind - of course correlation doesn't equal causation but it'd still be interesting to see what science has to say and not just a seemingly random email you got.