The Truth about Hair?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 168 times


reply posted on 6-12-2010 @ 06:36 PM by RicketyCricket
reply to post by Aggie Man



I have wondered the same thing for a while.

Then that should bring up the question of - Is it just hair on the head, or is body hair included?

I have to ask because Im a beast. All the hair, all the where. LOL.

I perceive danger better than most of my friends (male and female) especially when I have longer hair. Whether or not that is coincidence or me being paranoid is another topic altogether. I do wonder how much of it is based on the hair, and how much is based on how I am able to read people. I am generally pretty good at reading folks.

Thats not to say I am psychic or know when they will die or how much money they will make in their lifetime, but rather, I see what people dont want to be seen (necessarily). I can tell when they are lying, being truthful, and when it is time for me to go. Most of the people in my life trust my intuition and we have been removed from situations before they have gotten out of hand. Again, whether or not my hair has anything to do with this is anyone's guess, and I would assume they'd say it wasn't.


reply posted on 6-12-2010 @ 08:11 PM by Stewie
reply to post by davespanners


True, the environment is different. But, you can't pick and choose what the facts are, especially when there are NO facts. In other words, the "story" is that the ones with uncut hair performed normally, as opposed to the cut hair dudes that failed. It doesn't say they didn't perform at all. if they had failed to perform at all, then the change in environment could be a very good reason why.
So, lacking sources, we can determine only whether we believe it is plausible. I mean, if Samson regretted getting his hair cut, that is good enough for me.



reply posted on 6-12-2010 @ 08:21 PM by davespanners
reply to post by Stewie



True enough, I would note though that the VietCong weren't known for their long locks and they seemed to manage ok


reply posted on 6-12-2010 @ 08:33 PM by NoAngel2u
reply to post by onehuman



Truly fascinating, and I don't need proof, because it resonates as biologically true to me, but I'm still gonna google it. Wanna see what if anything else out in the wild web about it.


reply posted on 6-12-2010 @ 08:42 PM by Stewie
reply to post by davespanners


That may be because they were in the right. That was their home, and they were defending it.
That is my opinion.
I don't know if the Viet Cong all cut their hair, or if the ones that didn't, if any, defended their homes better.
All this speculation is making my head and hair spin.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^