It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Last Thursday, September 2nd, a woman Army colonel acting as a judge in the prosecution of LTC Lakin ruled to deny his defense team discovery of any documentary proof that Barack Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States. What she has done is gutted LTC Lakin’s very defense, which is despicable.
Lind ruled that it was "not relevant" for the military to be considering such claims, that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led up to the Pentagon, and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.
Paul Rolf Jensen, Lakin's civilian attorney, said the case would continue. But he said the courts now have denied his client the opportunity to present his defense.
Jensen had argued that under U.S.C. Rule 46, a defendant put on court martial has the right to call any and all witnesses and obtain any evidence in his or her defense.
Lind, who took 40 minutes to read her decision to the court, disagreed.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
One of the reasons given was that it could be "an embarrassment" to the President.
What she has done is gutted LTC Lakin’s very defense, which is despicable.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
One of the reasons given was that it could be "an embarrassment" to the President.
This has been discussed here before, and your reasoning is wrong
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I wonder if this can go to a non-military court?
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
this is not some private on AWOL - it's a Lt Col with 18 years of excellent service who purposefully, with discretion and clarity chose to go public against Obama. I agree with some of your points but his standing should have some merit... guess it doesn't work that way.
I wonder if this can go to a non-military court?
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I personally feel Obama is ineligible, for many reasons and I hope some judge in America allows this to progress without throwing out evidence for no reason, as seen in some previous cases.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
One of the reasons given was that it could be "an embarrassment" to the President.
This has been discussed here before, and your reasoning is wrong
Where? got a link? This just happened last week. he news article used the term "an embarrassment" what do YOU think it means?
CAAFlog
As we previously noted, in its New decision, quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 217, 218 (1962), CAAF observed that “judicial review of ‘a political question’ is precluded where the Court finds . . . ‘the potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question. ’” United States v. New, 55 M.J. 95, 108-09 (C.A.A.F. 2001). And in her ruling, here’s how Judge Lind used “embarrassment”: “The potential for embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question are uniquely powerful to ensure that courts-martial do not become the vehicle for adjudicating the legality of poltiical decisions and to ensure the military’s capacity to maintain good order and discipline in the armed forces.”
In other words, Judge Lind used the word “embarrassment” in precisely the political question doctrine context (and using almost exactly the same words) as CAAF in New and the Supremes in Baker v. Carr. And all the breathless birther commentary saying that she was attempting to avoid personal embarrassment to President Obama is just so much guano.
Originally posted by slinger
Its not a hard thing to do show a copy of a birth certificate mine is in a drawer in the bed room!
Just prove to me this guy has the authority to send me!
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I'm just reporting this... don't take this as my truth. I personally feel Obama is ineligible, for many reasons and I hope some judge in America allows this to progress without throwing out evidence for no reason, as seen in some previous cases.