posted on Aug, 26 2010 @ 07:36 PM
I am afraid my perspective wont go away that easily,the First Lady was PROTECTED by the instigators of the assasinaton ,the shooter or shooters were
ORDERED TO MINIMISE THE RISK OF HITTING HER---ALL OTHERS IN THE CAR AND MOTORCADE WERE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE COLLATERAL DAMAGE-.
Therefore ,any professionals reading this will beyond any doubt be able to reverse extrapolate the most likely plan of action and placement of
shooters USING THIS FACT.
Come on guys you all know that the major impediment to solving this issue has been a starting point that excludes oswald,I have shot varmits in my
youth and big game in my younger years,that idiot didnt hit anyone,he was probably told he was a decoy and that was why he had such a stupid smile on
his face after the action was complete.He most likely fired that piece of crap rifle just to provide forensic evidence,he was a born patsy by nature
and you pros know it.He took one for WHAT HIS DELUDED MIND THOUGHT WAS THE TEAM,AND DID IT KNOWINGLY.
So who is stepping up here to disprove me,chuckle--chuckle,I am a professional intuitist,you will find that I am right,if you truly look where I know
you are educated enough to look you will break this wide open,I am NOT EDUCATED AND EXPERIENCED AS SOME OF YOU ARE-----BUT I AM AN INTUITIST---PLEASE
BECOME PART OF THE TEAM ALREADY.
By the way I posted this years ago,and in the interm someone has come forward and openly admitted he was the shooter and his evidence supports me,but
WE WONT USE HIS STATEMENT BECAUSE WE DONT NEED IT----do we guys.
Any takers here??I couldnt resist if I were one of you professionals.