Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
Nope, I actually read quite a bit. I've found that holocaust denial tends to be based on flawed thinking, bad research and a mindset that is skewed
towards antisemitism. And "dishonest"? Rofl, sorry, you have that backwards I'm afraid. Do you have ANY evidence that isn't based on Zundel, Leuchter
or anyone else who hasn't been exposed as either a) a fraud, b) a liar or c) a pro-Hitler fanatic?
A better question one could ask themselves is WHY is every messenger (regardless of scientific background, etnicity or creed) being turned into a
fraud, liar or nazi by the immensely powerful pro-Holocaust lobby?
Each and every time someone comes forward or quotes research that asks some profound questions about the gas chambers or the grand extermination plan
it is like a huge well oiled machine comes into action.
If the revisionist is a Jew - label him delusional, self-hating - done. German? Neo-nazi scum Hitler worshipper - done. Arab? Pro-Palistinian Israel
It is good to see that more and more people are starting to ask questions though - despite the fortress that has been built around the Holocaust and
gas chambers. And despite the huge defamation machine that keeps working overtime to keep the story intact. That includes thousands if not tens of
posting like - well very much like you AngryCymraeg. That includes media that only follows mainstream orders - including
keeping the long since revised 6 million number alive. That includes magazines, movies, musea and merchandise all jerking the tears of the
to keep the story alive. (Read: The Holocaust Industry by Norman Finkelstein).
In placing this thread into a dark corner at ATS you can also see the machine has found its way here on ATS.
What does it all matter? What if there was no extermination plan and Jews have not been systematically gassed in places like Auschwitz and Treblinka?
What if hundreds of thousands simply died of disease and starvation, especially at the end of the conflict? That would still be very bad and both
Germans and Allies would have to take the blame.
It DOES matter because if the extermination in gas chambers did not take place this would shed an entirely different light on contemporary human
It would raise serious questions as to the existence of Israel
It would raise serious questions as to the Carte-Blance
Zionists have had since WWII
It would raise serious questions on the ongoing financial support and reparations being paid to Israel
If anything it would have a profound impact on public opinion.
I would go as far as saying it would change the world we live in overnight.
Questions like "What else has been lied about?" would be raised and the validity of wars would be questioned. The Palestinian issue would be looked at
in an entirely different light. It may even start a whole new conflict. And what about the Germans today? They will sure have some questions of their
own including the state model they have been forced in and their "eternal guilt" that has been imposed on their people for generations.
So you see It IS important to keep the story alive - vital even.
And that is precisely why any research is suppressed, ridiculed and prohibited by law.
And that is why your demand for any UN-ridiculed research from anyone questioning the gas chambers or extermination policy cannot be provided - not
because it is invalid research, but rather because the well-oiled machine makes sure it is ridiculed, buried and kept out of mainstream.
Luckily there is the Internet which gives any objective researcher the possibility to view ALL sides of the story and provides access to a plethora of
material which poses serious questions and exposes many myths surrounding the alleged
mass extermination of the Jews in gas chambers during
Materials that have obviously been banned and their authors persecuted, imprisoned and even threatened with bodily harm or worse. Some have been
assaulted, their homes firebombed or cars blown up. If the Holocaust is so evident then why is it necessary to eliminate the messengers in such a
The draconian denial laws only are more fuel on the fire of doubt. Revisionism (not denial) is a natural process of asking questions and using
scientific methods of validating history. Historical revisionism is accepted for any topic or subject - except for the Jewish Holocaust. Now why is
that? If the truth can hold up in court there is nothing to fear from these evil Neo-Nazis and self-hating Jews who dare to ask some serious questions
If they can be so easily exposed then why is the debate still going on to this day as to what exactly happened? I for one am convinced that IF
revisionism ever turns mainstream all hell will break loose.
And heaven help Israel if the story turns out to be a lie, because here on Earth they will have no support anymore.
edit on 24-11-2012 by
MoonMine because: Spelling