Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin
So you're saying the headline 'judea declares war on germany' means something else other than judea declares war on germany?
You certainly haven't offered anything in this thread that would lead me to believe that it was anything else than a sensationalist title by a BRITISH
JOURNALIST - as opposed to some SECRET JEWISH HQ that you're implying.
I have given full context on how that headline came to be. You have offered nothing of the sort. You didn't even seem aware of who wrote that
headline. Again, taking headlines from newspapers is a far cry from actually offering documents or such stuff. There simply was no Judea in 1933 that
could have declared war, except a loose confederation of Jewish advocacy groups, some European, some American, all working on their own agendas. You
confuse the polemical with the literal.
Let's take Filosophia's research methods and apply it to another, more contemporary issue:
Gays declare war on Ron Paul
In Filosofia's world, there are no polemics. Every headline is to be taken literal.
Does this mean that some Pink Brigades or on their way, locked and loaded, to attack a country named Ron Paul?
Or are Filosophia's research methods - here, especially the confusion of what is polemical and what is literal - simply worhtless?
Considering the British did everything in their power to a) give Palestine to the jews, and b) defeat Hitler, I would say the British were wrapped
around world jewery's fingers.
There were plenty of Anti-Zionist Brits. Certainly, the british populace was not ready to start a war based solely on what some extreme Zionists
demanded (even the articles quoted so far in this thread make this abundantly clear) - if so, the Second World War might have started simultanously in
the Far Eastern and European theaters.
How about 'Germany Must Perish' by Theodore Kaufman? Is he also just a British journalist?
No, he was an extreme, American-born Zionist and a verry shoddy anti-Nazi /anti-German propagandist. What does that prove as to your alleged
Are you insinuating that Kaufman was part of some secret plot to bring about World War 2? If so, this might just be a function of your antisemitic
brain overestimating the importance of any given Jew.
Simply name-dropping Zionist propagandists is a long way from proving some kind of conspirational plot by the Jews in order to bring about World War
But you already knew that. Jumping the shark indeed.
edit on 22-9-2012 by NichirasuKenshin because: Exemplification added.
So my question would be thus: Are you seriously claiming that the Daily Exrpess was the official organ of world Jewry at that time?
It seems you do.
edit on 22-9-2012 by NichirasuKenshin because: edited to add a question