It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikelee
OK....Roswell.
Original BREAKING STORY on that day stated flying saucer found.
What more "proof" than that? Its was obviously a cover up with no doubt. The military changed their story to fit the excuse.
After known problems that the Russians were having with their newly founded UFO, the US did not want to risk anything.
Originally posted by rusethorcain
Originally posted by itchy_tartan_blanket
Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by yeti101
belivers arn't interested in the truth theyre more interested in confirming their belief system. Theyre not objective or able to think critically. The proof is in this thread.
You realize what a convoluted argument this is? It can be turned around.
Naysayers are not interested in the truth they're more interested in confirming their belief system. They are not objective or able to think critically. The proof is in this thread.
...and if either side has a firm predetermined belief system, almost a brainwashing, that is very hard to upend ...it is the naysayers.
The believers have already accepted and digested the new information and are able to run with it.
[edit on 13-7-2010 by rusethorcain]
But where is this truth?
That's all I want to say to this post because it's slightly off the OP topic. What naysayers are we speaking of here? Non-believers in aliens? Or those that don't believe in alien visitation based on the information available to us? We ARE interested in the truth. Surely that is evident?
The truth of the matter is, it appears some on this thread are willing to settle for a half truth. Fine, that is up to you to stop halfway in "The Quest" and hope it works out for you. I fancy your odds if I'm truthful. But right now, I won't stop hoping until I'm sure, way beyond a doubt that we've been visited.
The wild thing is, that if it was proved right now that aliens are here in their ships, all those against the thread would immediately say "Ha! We told you so!" The whole thing is a jigsaw. We can see all the pieces, and have a fair idea what the picture is, but we are just a few pieces short. And it's these pieces that will determine the whole picture. Aliens, in vessels, here on Earth. Then the picture will be complete.
A pile of building materials is not a building.
Yeti didn't read what I was saying but you shouldn't go jumping on the bandwagon either until you know where it's going. I believe in UFO's, extra terrestrials, and cryptoterrestrials.
Do I have any proof?
No. I have the word of others which I believe but my friend, the skeptic, does not, so the challenge is to prove it to him.
When a computer takes in enough information it jumps to a reasonable conclusion based on the variables entered, it offers an assortment of possibilities based on likelihood. I type in the letter a and my computer takes me to abovetopsecret because I have gone there so many times before it just knows.
I am like my computer. I have digested enough information on the topic, weighed the credibility of the witnesses, and determined they were credible, determined that the supporting evidence was credible enough to back them up, and in some cases determined that since they actually touched or were in direct proximity to said object, UFO or ET could not have been mistaken for something or someone else.
And, like my computer the more information I take in, the more all the answers point to extraterrestrial life manning ships in our atmosphere.
Now what I said above referring to naysayers...these are those who insist all UFO's have an Earthly explanation.
None of us are born believing in UFO's.
We are all taught no such thing exist.
It is easier to maintain that firm belief that no such thing exists, than it is to step out of the box and say otherwise... no matter what you see.
To leave "no such thing exists" and go to "something exists" requires an effort, a paradigm shift. If it were just a handful of people who have made this paradigm shift I might say it was an anomaly. However huge masses of people have already decided what their parents, their teachers and conventional wisdom have told them is a lie.
This dramatic shift requires something other than mass hallucination or misinterpretation to bring it about in so many people.
So I am saying the fact that there are millions of people who have stepped out of the box leads me to believe...there is a good reason for them all to go there.
I am not imagining things, we are not all imagining things, we are being visited.
Originally posted by itchy_tartan_blanket
I'm sorry big chap but why do you refer to these aliens in names "earthborne"? If that's not a word then it is now! It was seen here first...maybe.
I know the most natural counter-argument to this. But before you try mate, you must be able to prove that aliens visit or have visited Earth? End the argument here now. You cannot say we are not ready or you would've not told your story. You would not be on a forum either. So prove you're extra-terrestrial. Prove you're not "one of us". How'd you get here ya madman?
Where's your vessel? What's the best alcohol on your planet? You brought Buckie to these shores didn't you? To be honest, it IS moon juice!
I don't understand why you would broadcast in a forum but not on TV
Know what I mean?
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by AnthraAndromda
AnthraDromedary.....
This is something I simply don't understand about ATS.
On the one hand.....
If I post a series of lies & hoax material, it states quite clearly in the T&C's that I could be banned.
On the other hand.....
Posting a series of lies & hoax material in order to feign the identity of an alien seems to be acceptable.
Regards
Maybe...maybe not
y'all have a nice evenin' now, hear.
Edmund Duke: Starcraft Terran General - Quote:
"...y'all have a nice evenin' now, hear..."
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
You have absolutely NO evidence or reason to think that what I've been posting is either a lie or a hoax.
You simply don't like what I have to say, so you reject it violently. You call it a lie and a hoax because you want it to be.
As I have already said; I have made my claim, and I have provided evidence.
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by rusethorcain
Some observations;
One, the "official" footage starts out with what appears to be stock footage of what are Mig -21's taking off. why would any official footage, classified or not have this edited into it?
Second, the cockpit doesn't appear at all to be from a Mig-21. Search Mig-21 cockpit view on Google images, look for airforce walkaround,: there are actually umpteen cockpit images to choos from. None of them look at all like the cockpit in the video to me. If it's official film, why use different types of aircraft. This mistake is seen constantly in film, where differing types are used to represent one aircraft, and it's really distracting to aircraft fans.
I would also ask why the film is so short, why were they filming from the cockpit anyway, and also where is the film from the other aircraft?
The Mig-21 was still equipted with cannon as opposed to only missles, normally any footage would be from gun camera's instead of the cockpit.
Just off the top of my head.
[edit on 15-7-2010 by OldDragger]
[edit on 15-7-2010 by OldDragger]
Originally posted by itchy_tartan_blanket
Originally posted by mackblack27
Originally posted by itchy_tartan_blanket
reply to post by AnthraAndromda
I am not going to argue with you over proof and evidence. It's been covered. And I like you. And in the nicest possible way - I think you're absolutely mental! It's a compliment in Scotland
What you think is proof is nothing but evidence to me my friend. There is nothing I've read, seen or heard that convinces me 100% that we are being visited now or ever. People can say they believe 100% that it is so, but to say they know......?
He is quite endeering in a quirky way
As a glasgow boy myself Im more inclined though to go for the term heed banger or basket weaver. If he started preaching this stuff outside ibrox how long do you thik it would be before he was in the gutter LOL
FOLLOW FOLLOW
mackblack27
PMSL!!! Basket weaver! Class!
I'm an Easterhouse Bhoy originally myself but in Irvine now. But you more than most will know I mean absolutely no harm. Where you from? And where are you now?
One thing I must say though.....he sounds like a hun
I AM only on the wind up here
What's your thoughts on the topic though mack? Can you honestly say, beyond reason of doubt, that there is proof we've been visited? Personally I'd love to say aye but I just can't.
Originally posted by yeti101
i think the believers have done a good job in showing how irrational they are about this subject. Even when shown what they are being presented is false they still choose to believe its genuine. They wonder why people dont take this subject seriously
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
Not 1 debunker on ATS has impressive stuff.
Originally posted by rusethorcain
Originally posted by yeti101
i think the believers have done a good job in showing how irrational they are about this subject. Even when shown what they are being presented is false they still choose to believe its genuine. They wonder why people dont take this subject seriously
And the dis-believers have done an equally great job NOT proving it is all a big hoax.
Some witness interviews can be extremely compelling even without photographic evidence. I cannot discount many of those interviews.
Old Dragger and others are disproving "photographs" brought up for scrutiny as well they should.
Others here calling themselves "skeptics" seem to do little more than hitch-hike on other people's illumination, parroting the same tired talking points.."Yeah, what he said"...and "It wasn't in the Newspapers"..or "Why is the film so short?"
There are many possible explanations for all these questions too...
I myself could argue and bring an excellent case why these things may not exist, but this does not mean I would be right.
Just because there is no proof, does not mean there was no crime.
[edit on 16-7-2010 by rusethorcain]