It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by absolutestatic
Welcome to ATS. You`ll fight right in to this diverse bunch. Enjoy your stay.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
reply to post by absolutestatic
Welcome absolutestatic.
How do you use an e-meter?
IRM
Originally posted by woodwytch
reply to post by absolutestatic
Hey there absolutestatic, and welcome to ATS ... I hope you enjoy the time you spend here ... however, as others have suggested it would be wise to take the strain and prepare to have some pertinent questions asked.
There are not many Scientology sympathizers on here ... but who knows ... you might be able to clear-up a few points about such matters
Another piece of advice I would offer for you to do with as you will ... maybe best not to lay all you cards on the table at once ... sometimes a little mystique makes getting to know someone more interesting.
Good Luck during your ATS experience.
Woody
Originally posted by Conclusion
reply to post by absolutestatic
Welcome. A magician?! Excellent. I love magicians. Slight of hand, abracadabra...all that. Maybe you can tell us a few secrets. Welcome to ATS and I hope to read your threads later.
Originally posted by Totalstranger
welcome! I want to experience Sceintology. can you help me find out how to get in? I am in Ann Arbor MI. I want to see for myself whats going on. what do I need to do? PM me...
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by absolutestatic
Welcome to ATS. You`ll fight right in to this diverse bunch. Enjoy your stay.
Originally posted by MrVertigo
Hi and welcome!
I'm a former Scientologist myself and have quite an interest in sorcery (Carlos Casteneda etc.)
I'm curious, did you do OT alone or did you do the entire bridge up to it?
What do feel that you have gained from it and how do you feel it fits in with your previous training in spiritual matters?
Regards
MrVertigo
Originally posted by twentythreedom
sorry but you scientologists wind me the hell up. tell me.....
1 what is "processing"?
2 what is "OT7"?
3 what is an "e-meter"?
4 do you assume anyone reading your post would know the answers?
they are genuine enquiries, i would appreciate your rsponse very much. TIA..
23
Originally posted by and14263
Hi welcome...
So if you're not a scientologist church member does that mean that:
You realise it is based on a sci fi book,
Was created to earn money,
Are not dumbed down to the point of being a drone,
Did not spend lots of money getting to where you are,
Do not spend lots of money 'retaining your faith'?
I hope you can answer my questions and I hate to sound mean but scientologists have done so much bad to people I need to learn more about your side of it.
Originally posted by and14263
reply to post by MrVertigo
Yeah I understand which people are suffering due to scientology and the manipulation of people by the church is what I was trying to point out in my questions. I'll apologise for my blanket statement, check my post history I never post anything without a source but in this case I really, sincerely felt a source was not needed.
Originally posted by MrVertigo
reply to post by and14263
I don't want to defend Scientology, far from it, but I do wish people would do a bit of research before making blanket statements like "scientologists have done so much bad to people".
See, I practice scientology processing but am not affiliated with the church or their beliefs. I do not use their E-meters or their rundowns, and have read less than 100 pages of material published under Hubbard's name. (To be honest, from what I see, he got a lot wrong.) Of course, most of the literature on the internet about the Church of Scientology is right in line with your assessment, but I will not speak as an authority on something I have not experienced firsthand.
Originally posted by absolutestatic
Originally posted by twentythreedom
sorry but you scientologists wind me the hell up. tell me.....
I have found that when one person responds to another as representing a collective (e.g. “you scientologists”, “you white people”, “you conspiracy theorists”, “you Republicans”, etc.), they are not looking at the person whom they are addressing. Instead, they are reacting to previous situations, and projecting their unresolved issues on top of the person they are allegedly addressing. Whatever judgments you are harboring toward me because I referred to myself as a scientologist, perhaps you might consult a mirror and confront their source. In the meantime, perhaps some definitions will help unwind you?
1) Processing – “a systematic series of actions directed to some end” (dictionary.com). The “end” of scientology processing is the increase of ability and awareness alongside a correlative decrease in the unconscious distortion of perceptions and reactive emotionality.
2) OT7 - a group of prompts designed to bring about an increase in awareness and ability when correctly run. Levels are run in a pre-determined series, OT7 following previous levels that are run first.
3) An “e-meter” or “electropsychometer” measures changes in a body's electrical resistance (see “Clarity Meter” or “GSR meter”). It is basically a Wheatstone bridge used as a biofeedback device, indicating arousal of the autonomic nervous system's “flight or flight” response. The closer one gets to actual sources of a person's objections, problems, upsets, etc., the larger the objective read of autonomic arousal. I give more detail in an earlier response (scroll up if you are interested).
4) Alas, you make a good point. As with any specialized pursuit, specific terminology develops to save time when communicating to others in the field. Personally, I consider the resulting inaccessibility to be extremely counter-productive, so I encourage you (and everyone else) to ask if I fail to define a term. I, for one, remain a fan of Socrates’ contention that one must first define their terms if an ensuing discussion is to accomplish anything. But to answer your actual fourth question, I knew that most people would neither know nor care; the few people who could derive the most meaning from what I wrote would already know, or would have the wherewithal to look up unfamiliar terms online; and those with a slight to moderate interest my definitions and use of the terms in my post would ask for clarification.
Originally posted by cavrac
Hi Absolutestatic, Welcome
Have you read any of the documents from The Pilot, I thought they were pretty good and interesting.
www.freezoneamerica.org...