It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
They are talking about evacuating the G20 leaders.
~Keeper
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
I wonder how bad it would have been had the meeting been in NY or
some other large American City..
~Keeper
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
It's sad they've had to get violent, but I don't think it was avoidable this time.
I wonder how bad it would have been had the meeting been in NY or some other large American City..
~Keeper
Perhaps nobody sees the irony here.
The G8 / G20 have everyone tied around their fingers. The police are not another species of animal, and neither are the protesters.
These are everyday Canadians bashing the crap out of other everyday Canadians (which side is which doesn't matter). There is vandalism, damage, fire, chaos, and violence.
The leaders would be laughing, but of course, they aren't probably aware of what's going on. Well as long as the locals are preoccupied with each other, I guess they can get down to business.
If we want to send a message or exact change, this way isn't going to make it happen. The next time there's such a summit, the gov't will use today's events and behaviour as a precedent to enact even *tougher* laws and stamp down harder on everyone.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by TDotTkatch
Sorry to hear about your Mother and we all wish her the best, I am sure.
In one of your last posts you stated that law enforcment and others have been expecting violence from protestors from the outset. Of course they have! They are the ones who instigated the violence. Every mass protest such as the G8, etc has been plagued by violence that began with agent prov's.
Agent Prov Link
To limit free speech to "free speech zones" in a country that allows free speech anywhere, is a violation of their rights. In the Us, our constitution allows us to bear arms and protect such a right. We obviously dont and I never advocate violence, but at least they have the right to protest anywhere they choose as long as they do not harm anyone.
Even in the U.S., when we protest we keep it civil. Was it not just a couple months ago that the Tea party protested on the steps of the capitol? Senators even walked through the protestors to get to the capitol and not one violent act occured. I take that back....one man was yelling so hard he spit on a senator. But my point is that we have the right to protest where we want. For the government to inhibit free speech in any area is equal to violating a persons rights.
Protest at capitol
My last point is that if we really thought that TPTB were doing the job we asked them to do, there would not be protests. Just the fact that we feel the need to protest shows that our representatives are failing us. To me that is more important than a burnt-out police car. Hell, the people of Toronto paid for it. Can you arrest someone for burning that which is partially theirs?
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by SoulofBlack
So what is the answer? Peaceful protests are useless. Violent protests are useless. Do we simply stay home and catch Saturday morning cartoons and enjoy a bowl of high fructose corn syrup-injected cereal? Are we simply screwed and should we just go about our lives as usual?
A world where a man is not free is a world that is in constant war with its self. Thats not a world I want to be a part of.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
So what is the answer? Peaceful protests are useless. Violent protests are useless. Do we simply stay home and catch Saturday morning cartoons and enjoy a bowl of high fructose corn syrup-injected cereal? Are we simply screwed and should we just go about our lives as usual?