Republicans kill Senate jobless aid measure (unemployment extension), page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times
Topic started on 24-6-2010 @ 06:33 PM by David9176
WASHINGTON – Republicans on Thursday defeated Democrats' showcase election-year jobs bill, including an extension of weekly unemployment benefits for more than a million people out of work more than six months.

The 57-41 vote fell three votes short of the 60 required to crack a GOP filibuster, delivering a major blow to President Barack Obama and Democrats facing big losses of House and Senate seats in the fall election.

The rejected bill would also have provided $16 billion in new aid to states, preserving the jobs of thousands of state and local government workers and providing what White House officials called an insurance policy against a double-dip recession.

It also included dozens of tax breaks sought by business lobbyists, and tax increases on domestically produced oil and on investment fund managers. The demise of the bill means that unemployment benefits will phase out for more than 200,000 people a week.

Governors who had been counting on federal aid will now have to consider a fresh round of budget cuts, tax hikes and layoffs of state workers. "This is a bill that would remedy serious challenges that American families face as a result of this Great Recession," said Max Baucus, D-Mont., the chief author of the bill. "This is a bill that works to build a stronger economy. This is a bill to put Americans back to work.


news.yahoo.com...

Congrats to the people of the United States. I can't wait till we get the flurry of Republicans taking seats in November. If GARBAGE like this keeps happening...they are going to feel some WRATH.

I don't understand why this is a blow to Democrats? This looks more like a blow to people already struggling.

[edit on 24-6-2010 by David9176]


reply posted on 24-6-2010 @ 08:31 PM by Carseller4
reply to post by Shine71



Is this a decision straight from your heart, based solely on emotion?

Are you for never ending benefits? If not, what would your limits be?

I suggested earlier that benefits should expire when the recipient qualifies for Social Security.... Would that work for you?


reply posted on 24-6-2010 @ 08:37 PM by Shine71
reply to post by Carseller4



I worry about CRIME resulting from it. I worry that I will have to put bars on my windows. I worry about my family going to get gas wondering if they will be murdered for $20.

Do you require more answers??

This was NOT the appropriate time for the Republicans to vote this down.



[edit on 24-6-2010 by Shine71]


reply posted on 24-6-2010 @ 08:58 PM by ~Lucidity
reply to post by Carseller4


Well it's either that or welfare. Either way someone pays?


reply posted on 24-6-2010 @ 09:07 PM by Shine71
reply to post by ExPostFacto



You, as well as many many folks, are in a tough spot and it will unfortunately GET WORST. CALL, WRITE, OR FAX YOUR SENATE REPRESENTATIVE TODAY.

Strength in numbers folks!


reply posted on 24-6-2010 @ 09:13 PM by vor78
reply to post by Subjective Truth



It'll pass. The Democrats just wanted to score a few cheap political points in the process and will milk it for a few days before they drop the objectionable tax provisions. When that happens, it will pass overwhelmingly.

I'd guess that it passes by the end of next week.


reply posted on 24-6-2010 @ 09:14 PM by Clark Savage Jr.
reply to post by vor78



As one of the unlucky, I certainly hope you are right, friend. Otherwise, prospects are grim for a lot of us.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^