It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

5/22/2010 Crop Circle Encrypted message (Need Help)

page: 2
57
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 22 2010 @ 08:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Thermo Klein
 



Are some small groups of people hand-making some? yes of course, they have websites to prove it.


Since you've seen these sites, you'd expect that many others will have decided to try it out in their area.


I especially like how, apparently, those crop circle F@CKERS sometimes use tools that leave a higher level of electromagnetic radiation...


Show me the evidence please.

Are you talking about higher frequency parts of the spectrum, like x-rays or gamma rays, or even radioactive particles like alpha, beta particles?

There's mundane explanations for low-level emissions, and off the counter radiation counters/meters will give varied readings almost anywhere because of uncertainties in the readings. Only at much higher radiation levels than background would these devices be able to provide an accurate enough reading to distinguish it from background.

If we are to ignore all of this, we could believe that aliens have landed almost everywhere, and similarly this same false assumption has been used as an attempt to prove the existence of ghosts.

When asked about the processes that ET leaves behind radiation it's conveniently ignored in favour of blind & nonsensical belief.

Although, if ET is anything like us, they would leave behind at least small amounts of heat energy. But then again, it would be beyond the realm of consideration for UFO hunters to engage their brains using proper science, and instead of looking for real evidence of a landing saucer, they'd prefer to jump up and down with joy at residual gieger counter readings that can be attributed to background radiation.




posted on May, 22 2010 @ 08:12 PM
link   
I don't know about you guys, but this may represent a map of some sort, in math language... Just my 2 cents... "mathematics is the universal language" Source: Contact original movie

[edit on 22-5-2010 by lagenese]



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 08:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Tholidor
 





1. Each "spoke" of the wheel contains 8 arc segments.


My first thought was it might be a binary key pattern..



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 08:35 PM
link   
Here is the binary, within each "slice" going across then down, clockwise starting from the top (each group of 16 bits filling a "slice"):


01 11 11 10 11 00 11 01

01 01 01 10 01 10 00 01

00 01 01 10 01 10 10 01

10 01 01 10 01 10 11 01

11 01 01 11 00 10 00 01

00 01 01 00 11 10 10 01

10 01 01 10 01 10 11 01

10 01 01 11 00 10 01 01

10 01 00 00 10 10 01 01

11 01 11 11 10 10 01 01

00 01 00 01 11 10 00 01

11 00 10 00 00 11 10 01

My children are running around like crazy but as soon as I have a little time, I'll see if this means anything, in the sequence that I have recorded it.

--airspoon

[edit on 22-5-2010 by airspoon]

[edit on 22-5-2010 by airspoon]

[edit on 22-5-2010 by airspoon]



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 08:58 PM
link   
If there is a message here, half the information is redundant because codes on either side of each spoke are reverse images of each other.



Does YóCskiñkiéë… mean anything to anyone by any chance?

[edit on 22-5-2010 by Tearman]



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 09:10 PM
link   
Does anyone notice a slight 3D effect...like spokes spinning on a wheel? Some of my favorite crop circles are the ones that have a 3D image.



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 09:12 PM
link   
And let's keep this thread active at least until Airspoon has a chance to decipher the binary code.



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 09:21 PM
link   
reply to post by airspoon
 


Here's the text translation, probably won't come out right:

~ÍVai�m×!é�m�%�¥ß¥áÈ9

in Hex:
7e cd 56 61 16 69 96 6d d7 21 14 e9 96 6d 97 25 90 a5 df a5 11 e1 c8 39

in base 64:
fs1WYRZplm3XIRTplm2XJZCl36UR4cg5

in DEC/CHAR:

126 205 86 97 22 105 150 109 215 33 20 233 150 109 151 37 144 165 223 165 17 225 200 57



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 09:21 PM
link   
Good clue is that the inner most circle are all set the same way.



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 09:26 PM
link   
OK! I admit it! I'm a puzzle geek... LOL

I started looking for binary numbers within the circle. I've made a few assumptions:

I am assuming that the counterclockwise segments within each concentric ring represents "0", the clockwise segments represent "1" and that the "double spaces" represent "breaks".

Within each ring, I am reading the numbers in a clockwise direction.

(NOTE: The innermost ring, which I an calling Ring 1, is composed of all zeros - this seemed more likely than that it was all 1's. Also, if the clockwise segments are assumed to be zero, then many of the numbers have leading zeros which are disregarded in Binary. The starting point within each ring - and thus the sequence of the numbers - is arbitrary except that I began each ring at the space nearest the "top" of the diagram in the post above. The rings are numbered from the center outward.)

DECIMAL decode:

Ring 2: 6 ! 6 ! 24
Ring 3: 2046
Ring 4: 16 ! 4 ! 14
Ring 5: 62 ! 6 ! 4
Ring 6: 768 ! 2
Ring 7: 2048
Ring 8: 8 ! 6 ! 30

OCTAL decode:

Ring 2: 6 ! 6 ! 30
Ring 3: 3776
Ring 4: 20 ! 4 ! 16
Ring 5: 76 ! 6 ! 4
Ring 6: 1400 ! 2
Ring 7: 4000
Ring 8: 10 ! 6 ! 36

Maybe tomorrow, I'll try reading the binary counterclockwise and/or reverse the assumed 1's and 0's, but for now my brain is feeling soggy.

Fun stuff!

[edit on 22-5-2010 by Tholidor]

[edit on 22-5-2010 by Tholidor]

[edit on 22-5-2010 by Tholidor]



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 09:32 PM
link   
Sry I posted in wrong forum.

[edit on 22-5-2010 by wiredamerican]



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 09:37 PM
link   
reply to post by wiredamerican
 


Are you sure it's the can can? I hear Hava Nagila!



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 09:47 PM
link   
reply to post by 2theC
 


I see it as 2 8 bit sequences containing 12 parts. You can read the 8 bit sequence starting from the inside or the outside of each slice down the left and the right. Reading either left to right or right to left giving 4 possible values for each slice.

I did the top one as follows (OLR reading left column then right column starting from the outside, MLR starting from the middle and RL reading right to left).

OLR 01111010 11101011 7AEB
MLR 01011110 11010111 5ED7
MRL 11010111 01011110 D75E
ORL 11101011 01111010 EB7A

7AEB, 5ED7, and D75E are all Chinese unicode characters. EB7A is a Greek unicode character.

It would take a lot of time to parse the whole wheel and I know neither Greek nor Chinese so I've lost a bit of interest but I thought I'd pass the idea along.



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 10:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tearman
If there is a message here, half the information is redundant because codes on either side of each spoke are reverse images of each other.

[edit on 22-5-2010 by Tearman]


Interesting observation! Looking along the spoke, rather than within a wedge, a segment is either left or right, on/off? What would the binary look like read along the spoke rather than inside the segment?



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 10:26 PM
link   
If it is in fact a code, it is most likely going to be binary, however the binary isn't meaning anything at this point in either decimal or ASCII, no matter which sequence I follow. In one sequence, I can get it to give me normal letters (aA-zZ) in ASCII (as I believe the previous "disc" was encoded), however those letters are not forming words. Have the CC researchers determined whether or not this one looks genuine?

Here's what I'm thinking thus far, instead of sequencing the alleged binary in each slice, it should be sequenced on the spokes, going either up, down or across in either direction. The reason that I say this, is because the side of each spoke contains an oppisite from the other side, suggesting that the spoke is the "medium" or neutral.

--airspoon



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 10:36 PM
link   
This thing looks awfully familiar.

Who ever made it, I give them props for their crops, its very cool.

But, it is really familiar damn where have I seen this thing?



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 10:59 PM
link   
reply to post by airspoon
 


Heres what I got from this site when I decoded your code.

"~ÍVai–m×!é–m—%¥ß¥áÈ9"


I know you already said it doesn't make sense...OR does it?? muhahah.
This stuff is always entertaining!


edit: DOH. Wish it would actually display what it shows on the screen...hmmm...

well anyway, heres the numbers that it gave in order.

205,8211,215,233,8211,8212,144,165,223,165,225,2009



[edit on 22-5-2010 by Wookiep]



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 11:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Wookiep
 




"~ÍVai–m×!é–m—%�¥ß¥áÈ9"


Phonetic attempt at the English language for

"I am benign"

[edit on 22-5-2010 by wiredamerican]



posted on May, 22 2010 @ 11:12 PM
link   
reply to post by wiredamerican
 


Ha! I can actually see that.
Thanks!



posted on May, 23 2010 @ 12:20 AM
link   
I have actually broken it down by "spoke" with each side of the spoke a different 8 bit decimal number, starting from the center. The pairs are different sides of the same "spoke". Is there a pattern here? Can anyone make sense of these numbers?

10100001 (161)
01011110 (94)

11010111 (215)
00101000 (40)

10010111 (151)
01101000 (104)

10010110 (150)
01101001 (105)

11010110 (214)
00101001 (41)

10001111 (143)
01110000 (112)

10010110 (150)
01101001 (105)

11010110 (214)
00101001 (41)

11001110 (206)
00110001 (49)

11000010 (194)
00111101 (61)

11001111 (207)
00110000 (48)

10011010 (154)
01100101 (101)

--airspoon

[color=E42217]
**********************************************
**********************************************
*************** UPDATE ***********************
**********************************************
**********************************************


Okay, when I read the numbers from the circumference of the circle to the center, there seems to be a pattern though I'm extremely tired and will stop for the night but if anyone wants to work out the pattern, it would be much appreciated. Anyhow, I got these numbers (it's going clockwise, from the circumference to the center and down each side of the spokes):

(133)
(122)

(235)
(20)

(233)
(22)

(105)
(150)

(107)
(148)

(241)
(14)

(105)
(150)

(107)
(148)

(115)
(140)

(67)
(188)

(243)
(12)

(89)
(166)

For the sake of saving time and space, I have left out the binary equivalents, though it is basically what's up top, only reversed. There does definitely seem to be a pattern in those numbers and I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult for someone to figure it out, though I'll work on it tomorrow.

--airspoon

[edit on 23-5-2010 by airspoon]

[edit on 23-5-2010 by airspoon]

[edit on 23-5-2010 by airspoon]




top topics



 
57
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join