It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Jewish Porn,” World Union of Jewish Students.
“After things like Jewish calendar, Jewish singles, Jewish dating, and Jewish festivals comes ‘Jewish porn’ in the list of top search keywords that GoTo.com provide. That is to say that 1000s of people are searching for Jewish porn.
“Porn Upsets Palestinians,” The Advertiser, March 31, 2002.
“Porn movies and programs in Hebrew are being broadcast by Israeli troops who have taken over three Palestinian television stations of Ramallah, irate residents of the besieged West Bank town have told AFP. The offices of three local television and radio stations were occupied by soldiers yesterday morning, a few hours after tanks and hundreds of troops stormed the town in Israel’s biggest offensive against the Palestinian Authority and its leader Yasser Arafat.
The soldiers started broadcasting the porn clips — considered extremely offensive by most Muslims — intermittently this afternoon from the Al-Watan, Ammwaj, and Al-Sharaq channels, the residents said. ‘
The pornographic movies started on Al-Watan television at around 3:30 pm,’ one 34-year-old Palestinian mother named Reema told AFP. ‘I have six children at home, they have nowhere to go with what is going on here and can’t even watch TV,’ she said angrily. ‘It’s not healthy really. I think the Israelis want to mess with our young men’s heads,’ she said.
“The Law of Return [from Israel: Whose Country Is It Anyway?" by well-known Jewish lesbian feminist Andrea Dworkin, 1990. [posted here at igc.org]
“You have to see it to believe it and even seeing it might not help. I’ve been sent it over the years by feminists in Israel–I had seen it–I didn’t really believe it.
Unlike in the United States, pornography is not an industry. You find it in mainstream magazines and advertising. It is mostly about the Holocaust.
In it, Jewish women are sexualized as Holocaust victims for Jewish men to masturbate over.
Well, would you believe it, even if you saw it? Israeli women call it ‘Holocaust pornography.’
The themes are fire, gas, trains, emaciation, death … . Monitin is a left-liberal slick monthly for the intelligentsia and upper class. It has high productions and aesthetic values. Israel’s most distinguished writers and intellectuals publish in it.
Judith Antonelli in The Jewish Advocate reported that Monitin ‘contains the most sexually violent images. Photos abound of women sprawled out upside-down as if they have just been attacked.’
Or, in a magazine for women that is not unlike Ladies’ Home Journal, there is a photograph of a woman tied to a chair with heavy rope. Her shirt is torn off her shoulders and upper chest but her arms are tied up against her so that only the fleshy part of the upper breasts is exposed. She is wearing pants–they are wet. A man, fully dressed, standing next to her, is throwing beer in her face.
In the United States, such photographs of women are found in bondage magazines.
For purists, there is an Israeli pornography magazine. The issue I saw had a front-page headline that read: ORGY AT YAD VASHEM. Yad Vashem is the memorial in Jerusalem to the victims of the Holocaust. Under the headline, there was a photograph of a man sexually entangled with several women. What does this mean–other than that if you are a Jewish woman you don’t run to Israel, you run from it?”
“Desmond embroiled in £8m tax wrangle,” Media Guardian (UK), September 24, 2002.
“Richard Desmond [also Jewish], the owner of Express Newspapers, is in dispute with the inland revenue over a £8m tax bill. His argument with the taxman began after a 1993 business deal when United Newspapers agreed to buy 10 of his magazines, resulting in a £12m windfall for the pornography publisher …
The Money Programme revelations could not come at a worse time for Mr Desmond, who is desperately trying to shake off his ‘porn baron’ tag. Only 10 days ago he went on the BBC’s Ten O’Clock News to protest against the use of the word ‘pornographer’.
Demonstrating for the first time he is embarrassed by the P-word, Mr Desmond said of his critics: ‘They use the word pornography… they use all sorts of nasty words.’
Mr Desmond, who, according to his arch-rival David Sullivan, owns 50 top shelf titles and three porn TV channels, carried on: ‘We don’t publish pornography, we publish adult magazines.’
He has been trying to sell his porn empire for the last two years but there have been no takers. The Money Programme confirms MediaGuardian.co.uk reports that Mr Desmond was also spurred into action by a Guardian investigation into one of his pornography websites that offered live lesbian sex as well as other images portraying pregnant women and women as old as 78.
Hollywood movies and television at-large have been increasingly attacked in recent years for propagating a range of decadent values.
82% of Americans polled in a 1989 Associated Press/Media General survey felt that today's movies had too much violence,
80% felt there was too much profanity,
and 72% too much nudity.
72% of a Parents magazine survey supported prohibition "against making fun of religion" in the mass media.
A 1991 Gallup poll showed that 58% of Americans were "offended frequently or occasionally" by prime-time programming.
A 1989 Time/CNN survey documented that 67% of the American public believes the violence in movies was "mainly to blame" for rising teenage violence;
70% supported "greater restraints on the showing of sex and violence" in the movies. [MEDVED, Hollywood, p. 4]
In the 1992 Presidential election both Bill Clinton and Robert Dole criticized Hollywood for glorifying drugs.
In 1999 the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of National Drug Control Policy released the results of a joint report that studied the content of the top movie rentals and 1,000 most popular songs of 1996-99. 98% of the films and 27% of the songs "contained reference to either alcohol or drugs, 26% of movies portrayed illicit drug use in a humorous context." [OLDENBERG, p. 8B]
And in a 2000 report, the Federal Trade Commission "accused the entire [entertainment industry] of aggressively selling violent and sexually explicit films, video games and music to kids." [MSNBC, 4-24-01]
"That this [film and TV] industry," says Michael Medved, "more firmly associated with Jews than any other business in the world, is almost universally viewed as a destructive force in our society should be viewed with concern." [MEDVED, p. 42]
Not even focusing on the Hollywood world, in 1999, Rabbi Daniel Lapin wrote an extraordinarily unusual, and stunning, appraisal of the collective negative effects of the modern Jewish community upon the values of America:
"My firm conviction is that we must engage in an honest exploration of the problems and shortcomings of the Jewish community and Jewish communal leadership.
Instead of focusing on imagined enemies, we should ask whether dogmatic commitment to a secular-liberal vision is encouraging dislike for the Jewish community.
Without such honest self-appraisal, Jews will become more and more disliked -- not by crazed individuals but by decent Americans distressed over their rapidly deteriorating culture and the role of Jews in that agenda.
It cannot escape the notice of ordinary Americans coping with the challenge of raising responsible children in a hostile world that many Jewish names and groups lead the fight for policies these Americans see as causing the country's decline." [LAPIN, D., 1999, p. 42]
Originally posted by The Quiet Storm
are you kidding me?
Girls dance like that ALL the time. To people they don't know and just meet, and way dirtier than that. It's normal, that's 'dancing'.
Not that I agree with it, I dont.. but Miley Cyrus is doing it mild there. Oh wait, so now that a celebrity is doing it, it's wrong now? And underaged? people do that since middle school, they give blowjobs in bathrooms in middle school to "gangsters" or "badboys" after they bully someone weaker than them, then get passed around. And it's "normal" and "cool", in fact "what people their age do".
So now that a celebrity is seen doing it what will the girls who have been doing this since 12 think?
[edit on 15-5-2010 by The Quiet Storm]
Originally posted by Dock9
reply to post by Man1fesT
There's an army of Paid-to-Post subhumans online
posting in hundreds of forums
in the attempt to 'normalise' the sexualisation of children
and in the attempt to normalise what only a few years ago would have been described as 'low' and as 'depravity'
Originally posted by Taupin Desciple
reply to post by ImaNutter
Um..... let just set the record straight on something here. People aren't mentioning that my daughter has hannah montana gear because she doesn't. I never said she did. I did say that "I'm weaning her off that crap". That crap meaning the T.V. show, not the gear.
And no, I don't think that I'm morally superior to other people. I just have DIFFERENT moral standards than the people in question do.
And they're doing a lousy job at it.
The people in question are in a position where they are able to influence their VERY impressionable target audience. Young girls.
What good can possibly come from what Miley is doing nowadays and her parents' reaction to it? So she's at the age where she is experimenting sexually. Fine. But with a 44 year old gay man?