It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The New World Order & The Globalist Agenda

page: 13
173
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 03:18 PM
link   
reply to post by AshleyD
 


NEW WORLD ORDER= OLD WORLD DISORDER !
And we must get our brains to work and kill these ALIEN criminals that have mocked humanity for thousands of years!




posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 04:34 AM
link   
reply to post by ultraligt
 


I dare you to look into the background of George Soros and then declare the NWO is not necessarily evil. It is evil and diabolical to the core, even if those at the outer rung are well-meaning and sincere. The Illuminati infiltrated the Masonic Lodges, so does that make every Mason evil? No,it does not, but there is enough corruption at top Echelons that the whole fruit becomes tainted. It is said that our own George Washington was a Mason and even knew of Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776, and in fact did not care for the man. That said, the Masons had access to deep Inner mystical teachings which have since been abused by those who lust after money and power.
Interestingly, another thread on this site, on the Zeitgeist, includes some interesting discussion on the Book of Enoch and the Watchers. This is the story of angels who fell from heaven(per Revelation and the story of how Archangel Michael fought against the Dragon) and mated with the "Daughters of men" (female evolutions on earth) to spawn a hybrid of human and angel. The original fall of Lucifer is well documented biblically and the Luciferians who run the Illuminati know this, and trust me they believe in God, they just hate Him. The Rothschilds are one such family of Illuminati fame who reportedly even set a place at their dinner table for Satan. In case you think this does not matter, the Rothschilds are said to own 85 % of the worlds gold. They owned shares of BP Oil, which if Im not mistaken they dumped at the time of the oil spill. They are filthy rich beyond imagination. They profit off wars and conflicts.



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 



I think you are confused here brother, you take all the junk and you turned them into a one whole package. Now it is ready for consumption, eh?

The Illuminati was not founded by Adam Weishaupt on 1776. The Freemasonry was not infiltrated by the Illuminati, they are infiltrated by greed and that's the reason that they have fallen to their current state now, they have forgotten the whole point of freemasonry. George Washington was indeed a Freemason but he has been a member before the brotherhood succumbed to greed, look at the dollar bills there it says Novus ordo seclorum ("New Order of the Ages"). They intended America as their new hope, their New World Order where everyone will be liberated from the claws of the kings and queens at UK.

Now let's talk about Lucifer and Satan, if you have read books about this you would know that they are two completely separate beings/entity, the one is the Light while the other is the Adversary. Now onto the Luciferians yes they hate the God of this world and so do we, the God of this world they believed is Satan who created this world to trap souls into his very hell.



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:02 AM
link   
reply to post by michaelknives52
 

One wonders why Hollywood has consistently sported alien movies of varying sorts. Mostly they present them as more benign, such as in Contact with Jodi Foster, or Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Then theres The Fourth Kind which brings the Sumerian alien aspect into play and has an evil them with terrible abductions. Though it is considered widely to be a hoax, it does highlight the Sumerian text and connection.
I never considered an all out global fight with extra- terrestrials in which govts protect civilians, for one thing, because their underground bunkers are most likely not for us but for the Elite. However its still an intriguing theory.
I had a dream some time after the current WH occupant was inaugurated, in which I was at some type of resort, and I looked out one of the windows to see an alien ship hovering in the sky. It was matte finish sort of platinum look, similar to the Hindenberg. I remember this ominous feeling of angst, and people were running around looking for places to hide. I ran up some stairs, and saw one of the aliens start up the stairs behind me. I hurried the rest of the way up and found some kind of crawl space to hide. Later on, the people started to come out of their hiding places and I looked back out the window and the ship had passed but there was still the cloud cover associated with alien ship cloaking. The feeling I had was that the immediate danger had passed but that it wasnt completely over.
I felt at the time that the dream had more to do with the occupant of the WH and the communist/socialist/marxist agenda (hence the hindenberg ship?), but who really knows what they have in store for us. I was also looking into the birth cert theory, so Obama an alien in the WH maybe? The resort in the dream was white.



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Lateralussicksicksick
 


First, I am not a brother, but you may call me sister if you like. I have done much research on all these issues and topics, much of it is very interconnected. I am sorry you cannot see the thread, or it is too overwhelming for you, like so many people, who cannot fathom that there can be such a diabolical plot. What makes you think that Satan and Lucifer are not the same? You should read the bible if you are going to argue this point. A passage in Revelation I referred to earlier states this: "Now war arose in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought, but they were defeated and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world - he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him."[1]
So you see there are numerous names for Satan. Lucifer means "bearer of Light" Interestingly I found a passage quoted in a blog in which they try to dissuade people from attaching the name Lucifer to Satan, but here it is and you tell me if you think this Lucifer is not the Dragan and Satan cast down to earth by Archangel Michael...
"The word “Lucifer” is used in the King James Version only once, in Isaiah 14:12: “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!” The Hebrew word translated “Lucifer” is helel (or heylel), from the root, hâlâl, meaning “to shine” or “to bear light.”
I rest my case on that one. Heres the page for reference www.apologeticspress.org...
My point of Lucifers fall ties directly in to the Book of Enoch which is the written story of the Fall of Lucifer from Heaven, and there are names of various angels in the text, of particular interest, Azaziel who taught makind the art of war. Azaziel is also mentioned in Leviticus.
What does all this have to do with the Illuminati and the NWO? Just check Albert Pike a 33rd Degree Mason who wrote "Morals and Dogma" and who reportedly wrote a letter to a Guiseppe Mazzini which stated thus: ""The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm ..."
As Fox Mulder says in the X Files, the truth is out there...



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 04:21 PM
link   


Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus What makes you think that Satan and Lucifer are not the same?

Lucifer means light bringer/bearer and Satan means adversary. There is a big difference.



You should read the bible if you are going to argue this point.

Which has had more than 50 major rewrites, with additions and deletions made.



"The word “Lucifer” is used in the King James Version only once, in Isaiah 14:12: “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!”


Lucifer descended from 6th density to 3rd density to help us(our current density, soon to be 4th), hence the term "fallen angel".
And by the way the so called "son of God" and false Christ claims to be Lucifer so according to you he is the Devil himself!


Rev 22:16 (NIV) "I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star."




As Fox Mulder says in the X Files, the truth is out there...

The truth is within, the Bible even says so,“kingdom of Heaven is within.”

-Naeem



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 07:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by naeem11111


Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus What makes you think that Satan and Lucifer are not the same?

Lucifer means light bringer/bearer and Satan means adversary. There is a big difference.
Umm ok see the quote from Revelation where it is clear there are several names in the same passage referring to the same being... Dragon, That Old Serpent called the Devil and Satan....thats four in just a couple sentences. And then "his angels were cast out with him"... so he and they were angels obviously.


You should read the bible if you are going to argue this point.

Which has had more than 50 major rewrites, with additions and deletions made.
Yes, and even with all the variations, its clear that Lucifer, Satan, Devil, Dragon, Serpent are all the same thing, referring to Lucifer the light bringer Archangel fighting Archangel Michael and being cast into the earth, and all of Lucifers band falling with him.



"The word “Lucifer” is used in the King James Version only once, in Isaiah 14:12: “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!”


Lucifer descended from 6th density to 3rd density to help us(our current density, soon to be 4th), hence the term "fallen angel".
And by the way the so called "son of God" and false Christ claims to be Lucifer so according to you he is the Devil himself!
The term fallen angel means just that, he fell from heaven(wherever or whatever that is) to earth, its very explicit and "his angels were cast out with him", which relates to the Book of Enoch where they the story is told of how they mated with the daughters of men. A passage from Enoch..."[Chapter 6]

1 And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto 2 them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men 3 and beget us children.' And Semjaza, who was their leader, said unto them: 'I fear ye will not 4 indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.'



Rev 22:16 (NIV) "I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star."

wikipedia somewhat explains this dual meaning..."Traditionally, Lucifer is a name that in English generally refers to the devil before being cast from heaven, although this is not the original meaning of the term. In Latin, from which the English word is derived, Lucifer means "light-bearer" (from the words lucem ferre). It was the name given to the dawn appearance of the planet Venus, which heralds daylight. For this meaning, English generally uses the names "Morning Star" or "Day Star", and rarely "Lucifer".
and early Christian writers identifed Lucifer with Satan..."The Lucifer storyAn ancient myth[3] of the fall of angels, associated with the Morning Star, was transferred to Satan, as seen in the Life of Adam and Eve and the Second Book of Enoch,[4] which the Jewish Encyclopedia attributes to the first pre-Christian century:[5] in these Satan-Sataniel (sometimes identified with Samael) is described as having been one of the archangels. Because he contrived "to make his throne higher than the clouds over the earth and resemble 'My power' on high", Satan-Sataniel was hurled down, with his hosts of angels, and since then, he has been flying in the air continually above the abyss.[3]


Gustave Doré's illustration for Milton's Paradise Lost, Book IV, lines 1013–1015: Satan (alias Lucifer) yielding before GabrielEarly Christian writers continued this identification of "Lucifer" with Satan. Tertullian ("Contra Marcionem," v. 11, 17), Origen (Homilies on Ezekiel 13), and others, identify Lucifer with Satan, who also is represented as being "cast down from heaven" (Revelation 12:7–10; cf. Luke 10:18).[3]

But today some contemporary exorcists and theologians, such as Father José Antonio Fortea and Father Amorth, asserted that Lucifer and Satan are different beings.[6]"
So argue as you like.






As Fox Mulder says in the X Files, the truth is out there...

The truth is within, the Bible even says so,“kingdom of Heaven is within.”

-Naeem



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by naeem11111
 


I also found this on wikipedia:
"In the modern occultism of Dolores North (alias Madeline Montalban) (died 1982)[33] Lucifer's identification as the Morning Star (Venus) equates him with Lumiel, whom she regarded as the Archangel of Light, and among Satanists he is seen as the "Torch of Baphomet" and Azazel.

In the Satanic Bible of 1969, Lucifer is acknowledged as one of the Four Crown Princes of Hell, particularly that of the East. Lord of the Air, Lucifer has been named "Bringer of Light, the Morning Star, Intellectualism, Enlightenment."

As I said before, the named Azazel was used in both Leviticus and in the Book of Enoch.



posted on Feb, 20 2011 @ 08:21 PM
link   
I ve got a book on the illuminanti can Illuminaanti facts and fiction. its interest5ing it talks about new world order alot.



posted on Feb, 20 2011 @ 09:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by robotamadeus
I ve got a book on the illuminanti can Illuminaanti facts and fiction. its interest5ing it talks about new world order alot.

Sounds like a good one. Any more details?



posted on Feb, 21 2011 @ 12:41 PM
link   
I agree that the NWO is already a reality but I do think that you're basing its inception to be recent and that 9.11 was there takeover point where as I believe the second world war was the start of the NWO.
Its well known that in order to implement a world government you would have to reduce the worlds population dramatically and ensure those who survive are happy with less.
Secondly you would have to implement a need for control over all aspects of the masses lives making them reliant on the controlling entity.
The second world war did both of these things for them and in so doing reduced the control that certain country's had over the globe I.e USA and England while increasing hold's over smaller nation's controlling the debt the war caused in arm's and in the rebuilding after the war finished.
Now I believe this was the beginning of the takeover but now there is the same problem facing them as there was before the second world war as in our population no's has increased to an uncontrollable level.
Now Hitler's dream of the 3Rd rich has become a reality a unified Europe who's main control is Germany.
Most of the country's in Europe are now controlled by one ruling party on law,trade and currency with it's own police force [U N] Who can use any government's troops to [peacekeep].
Now like most of the post here I feel that a NWO is a bad idea and if you want proof of this the 2nd world war show's you just what it would mean for people who are of no use.
Now another world war is extremely unlikely therefore there option's are limited in way's to eliminate vast no's of people so concentration camp's may well become a reality again.
We need to remember the mistakes of the past other wise we will just repeat them after all with all the world conquest's that have come before have two things in common.
1.They made slaves of the vast majority of the world's population.
2.They all failed to maintain control over time.
This is why the NWO will fail.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 10:30 PM
link   
Anyone noticing that what is happening in Libya and Egypt is consistently being associated to the French Revolution.

Qaddafi's crazy comments about Bin Laden and hallucinogenics are right up this alley. Quite a few scholars have suggested that the Enlightenment period in France was kicked off by hallucinogens being ingested by the populace in the food supply.

This suggests to me that Qaddafi is not against this revolution - he is trying to plant and sell this concept of the enlightenment revolutions in the region. His sons are already well placed to step into the role of leading this "enlightenment" so taking the heat and planting and nurturing this idea is in his interests. He's an old man, his legacy has to live in his sons.

Someone has been going through a lot of work to recreate some of the key circumstances which lead to the groups which the enlightenment revolutions of Europe, Russia and Asia were predicated on, in Egypt, Libya, Iran, the surrounding seas, and Somalia. Right down to recreating the Barbary pirates even.

Amazing.
edit on 2011/2/24 by Aeons because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 27 2011 @ 09:40 AM
link   
reply to post by AshleyD
 


read Gold Red Alert on bestmetalresearch
It seems the govt has plans to confiscate your Silver and Gold...soon
The plan is to do so when Gold reaches 2,000 and to issue a world currency and reprice Gold at 10,000. NOt sure if this is true but...



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 07:17 PM
link   
what can we do for new world order?



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 03:42 AM
link   
'Post-Qaddafi Libya': on the Globalist Road


“Most participants argued for privatization and a strong private sector economy.” That is a statement culled from a report of a panel discussion entitled “Post-Qaddafi Libya: The Prospect and The Promise,” organized by Washington’s Center for Strategic and International Studies in 1994.[1] Dr Ali Tarhouni stated at the conference, “with privatization, entrepreneurs will reach out and get involved in regional cooperation by searching for markets.”[2] Is that what the long-planned, well-funded “spontaneous revolts” now toppling regimes like a house of cards is actually about?

Regional economic zones are a prime part of the globalization process. One well-known example is the concept of a “Trilateral” bloc of Asia, Europe, and North America, instigated by David Rockefeller as per the Trilateral Commission.[3] Others include NAFTA, European Union, APEC,[4] and the like.





posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 01:20 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 08:27 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 08:27 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 08:27 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 08:27 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



new topics

top topics



 
173
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join