It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The New World Order & The Globalist Agenda

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in


posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 04:47 PM

Hello, Everyone. In my opinion, the 'New World Order' agenda is indeed very real and is possibly one of most documented and admitted conspiracies. The information contained in this thread is an effort to provide evidence of such an agenda although it is not comprehensive as there is truly mountains of evidence to support a NWO conspiracy.

In this thread we'll examine:
1). Globalist Political Organizations.
2). Global Economic Organizations.
3). Admission Quotes Referencing a NWO.
4). Lesser Organizations Striving For a One World Government.





The Trilateral Commission is a private organization, established to foster closer cooperation among the United States, Europe and Japan. It was founded in July 1973 at the initiative of David Rockefeller, who was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time... The John Birch Society believes that the Trilateral Commission is dedicated to the formation of one world government.

Before we get into this organization, let's take a look at the startling admission by its founder, David Rockefeller, from his book Memoirs:

Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. (1, 2)

Contrast the above with some of the information on the official FAQ PAGE where they claim they are not intending to create a one world government. Although, on that same page they admit to working towards a 'global framework.' I believe this to be misleading. Although it is true we are unaware of any proposals to technically create a literal one world government by dissolving individual sovereign governments, they do, in fact (and admittedly so), strive for a unification process of world governments and sectors.

Evidence is shown to confirm this double-speak in a speech by Gordon Smith at the 2001 TC meeting, reproduced on the official TC website in his speech GLOBALIZATION & GOVERNANCE. He, too, mentions they don't seek to technically create a one world government but a new world order.

The end result is not satisfactory. There is a need for greater inclusion, a sharing in the benefits of globalization, and better means of managing what economists call global public goods—and “bads”—which cut across a number of institutions....

Let me now turn to the changing roles of states, the traditional locus of authority and accountability for governance. The reality of major global challenges that can only be met through intensive international cooperation is a major change affecting the efficacy of individual states....

But it does not follow the state is going away—far from it. What is needed is for the state to learn how to share power...

On a related and disturbing note, many members of the Trilateral Commission hold offices and positions of power in American politics, media, education, and economics. See: LIST.

Members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission dominate key positions in America's government, military, industries, media outlets and educational foundations and institutions. The following is a partial list of current CFR members and the positions of influence they hold in society. The CFR's membership is limited to 3,000, and there are only 325 Trilateral Commission members.




The United Nations Organization (UNO) or simply United Nations (UN) is an international organization whose stated aims are facilitating cooperation in international law, international security, economic development, social progress, human rights, and the achieving of world peace. The UN was founded in 1945 after World War II to replace the League of Nations, to stop wars between countries, and to provide a platform for dialogue. It contains multiple subsidiary organizations to carry out its missions. There are currently 192 member states, including nearly every sovereign state in the world.

IMO, the United Nations, although benevolently presented, is one of the largest reasons I believe globalization and a NWO is already here (Remember, NWO does not necessarily mean One World Government). Take a look at the following map to see just how many nations are members:


By definition, the 'New World Order' is:

new world order

–noun (sometimes initial capital letters)
the post-Cold War organization of power in which nations tend to cooperate rather than foster conflict.

The United Nations, according to their own definition:

The United Nations is an international organization founded in 1945 after the Second World War by 51 countries [currently 192] committed to maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations and promoting social progress, better living standards and human rights...

It doesn't seem so bad. Peace keeping, unity, and conflict prevention sounds good, even if that means a 'new world order.' However, the UN isn't a pure as it may sound.

The UN fits the definition of 'new world order' but it is also a stepping stone to a one world government. Some examples include:


The United Nations would like the dollar, euro, yen, and other national currencies to be succeeded by a new "global currency."


The World Health Organization (WHO) is considering a plan to ask governments to impose a global consumer tax on such things as Internet activity or everyday financial transactions like paying bills online.


More than 11,000 UN Police, from more than 90 countries, are currently working in 18 different field missions. Every day these women and men patrol, provide training, advise domestic policing services, help ensure compliance with international human rights standards and assist in a wide range of activities to restore and promote security, public safety and the rule of law.




The Club of Rome is a global think tank that deals with a variety of international political issues. It was founded in April 1968 and raised considerable public attention in 1972 with its report The Limits to Growth. The club states that its mission is "to act as a global catalyst for change through the identification and analysis of the crucial problems facing humanity and the communication of such problems to the most important public and private decision makers as well as to the general public."

Browsing their website you'll come across issues concerning GLOBALISATION and their support of the CLIMATE CHANGE TASK FORCE. I mention these two specifically because COR is highly focused on on global goals under the guise of environmental concern.

The published work, Limits To Growth (full document), focuses on human population limits in relation resources according to their own scientific models. They do not attempt to conceal their plans on a global scale as the following is published in their work:

...The Club of Rome also will encourage the creation of a world forum where statesmen, policy-makers, and scientists can discuss the dangers and hopes for the future global system without the constraints of formal intergovernmental negotiation."

Due to the fact COR stresses the problems facing our planet and the alleged over population problem, they have been accused by some conspiracy theorists of using issues like climate change, peak oil, and famine to support radical human population limits:

Throughout the world, the Club of Rome has indicated that genocide should be used to eliminate people who they refer to as "useless eaters."SOURCE

As an interesting side note, COR has also divided up the world into 10 sectors. This correlates to prophecy that states there will be 'ten kingdoms' as part of the one world government. The districts assigned by the COR as mentioned in their work Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System:





The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an annual, unofficial, invitation-only conference of around 130 guests, most of whom are persons of influence in the fields of politics, banking, business, the military, and media. Each conference is held under intense security and secrecy.

The Bilderberg group holds highly secretive meetings where the press is not allowed. Because of this, conspiracy theories run wild and solid facts are hard to come by. Instead of engaging in speculation, let's examine what we do know by basing the following off admissions from BG members. We've already discussed David Rockellefer's, previous BG attendee, admission so let's take a look at a few others:

Robert Zoellick

Bilderberg elitist Zoellick calls for IMF, WTO & World Bank to regulate national policy... World Bank President and Bilderberg elitist Robert Zoellick openly admitted the plan to eliminate national sovereignty and impose a global government during a speech on the eve of the G20 summit. 1.

Denis Healey

To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn't go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing. 1.

Henry Kissinger, eight times BG attendee, claims a 'new international order' is on the horizon. 1.

The above gives us some insight into the minds of Bilderberg attendees in terms of their feelings towards globalization. Unfortunately, information on an activity and agenda level as a whole is very difficult to come by due to the secrecy of the group. What we're mostly left with is speculative theories, which I'm trying to avoid in this thread.

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 04:48 PM

This section will consist of several financial institutions that operate on a global scale. This is being presented as evidence for a movement towards specific economic globalization, opposed to broad political globalization.



The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an international organization that oversees the global financial system by following the macroeconomic policies of its member countries, in particular those with an impact on exchange rates and the balance of payments. It is an organization formed with a stated objective of stabilizing international exchange rates and facilitating development.

IMF Members:


We can see in the image above almost the entire world is a member of the IMF and how we are already globally united economically, which the IMF admits is its purpose:

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an organization of 186 countries, working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world. 1

Some are highly critical of the IMF in that it uses debt to enslave countries, much like is being talked about in wake of the Haiti tragedy. Because the IMF frequently focuses on the economies of poverty-stricken countries, it is accused of debt oppression. 1




The G-20 was established in 1999, in the wake of the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, to bring together major advanced and emerging economies to stabilize the global financial market. Since its inception, the G-20 has held annual Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meetings and discussed measures to promote the financial stability of the world and to achieve a sustainable economic growth and development.

The Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (known as the G-20 and also the G20 or Group of Twenty) is a group of finance ministers and central bank governors from 20 economies: 19 countries, plus the European Union.


Most ATS members will be familiar with the concerns associated with G20 and the protests. For those of you who are not, here is a brief rundown of why so many are concerned with this group. The confrontation mainly stems from G20's relation to the new world order movement.

It involves wealth distribution (1, 2), proposed global taxes ( 3 ), steps towards a global currency ( 4 ), and other actions that bring us closer to a global economy.




The World Trade Organization (WTO) deals with the rules of trade between nations at a global or near-global level... It’s an organization for liberalizing trade. It’s a forum for governments to negotiate trade agreements. It’s a place for them to settle trade disputes. It operates a system of trade rules. 1


The WTO is more evidence that the NWO is already here concerning globalization on a world wide economic scale. Some top criticisms the WTO receives is that it enhances wealthier nations at the expense of poor, less developed nations, places low emphasis on human rights, undermines national sovereignty, and increases the level of inequality throughout the world. (1).




Created after World War II to help avoid Great Depression-like economic disasters, the World Bank and the IMF are the world's largest public lenders, with the Bank managing a total portfolio of $200 billion and the Fund supplying member governments with money to overcome short-term credit crunches.

But when the Bank and the Fund lend money to debtor countries, the money comes with strings attached. These strings come in the form of policy prescriptions called "structural adjustment policies." These policies—or SAPs, as they are sometimes called—require debtor governments to open their economies to penetration by foreign corporations, allowing access to the country's workers and environment at bargain basement prices. (1).

One of the primary focuses of the World Bank (and IMF mentioned above) is working with the economies of impoverished nations with the claimed intentions of elevating such countries to the status of prosperous wealthy nations. However, the WB often has results counter to this goal. Like the IMF and WTO, the World Bank also creates large inequalities in wealth while creating national debt slaves and compromises individual state sovereignty (2).

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 04:48 PM

In this section we'll explore general trends that are shifting towards the establishment of a new world order and global government. The below are general independent movements and admissions compared to the above government and economic examples.


The following quotes will be taken from THIS list and will provide a selection of famous figures who reference or believe in globalism. The below examples are only a sample. More can be read in the link.

Strobe Talbot, President Clintons Deputy Secretary of State

In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasnt such a great idea after all.

James Warburg

We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.

Henry Kissinger

NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order.

President George Bush Sr.

The world can therefore seize the opportunity [the Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.

David Rockefeller

We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.

Brent Scowcroft, George Bushs National Security Advisor

A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order.

Mikhail Gorbachev

Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.



Lesser known organizations:


WFM is a global movement dedicated to the realization of global justice, peace and sustainable prosperity through the development of democratic international institutions and the global application of international law. WFM believes that federalism applied on an international level, inspired by the experiences of the federal political systems worldwide that represent 40% of the world’s citizens, is the best way to accomplish these goals. Our vision is of a world where people have a sense of citizenship beyond national borders, to include their region and the global community.


The Institute for Global Policy (IGP) is a research and policy institute dedicated to the promotion of human security, international justice, the prevention of armed conflict and the protection of civilians. Through an emphasis on the democratization of international and regional organizations and the development and global application of international law, the Institute works to find pragmatic and action-based solutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges. Our vision is of a world where people have a sense of citizenship beyond national borders, to include their region and the global community.


...Is a leading international institution dedicated to research, analysis and dissemination about global governance. Based at the London School of Economics, the Centre aims to increase understanding and knowledge of global issues, to encourage interaction between academics, policy makers, journalists and activists, and to propose solutions.


We are a coalition of organizations working in various ways toward a civilized system of world law... Working for a world under law to be founded on a world constitution with a global bill of human rights. (2)



In conclusion, I do believe the conspiracy theories (if they can really even be called 'theories) concerning the New World Order, One World Government, and Globalism is one of the most validated. There is a mountain of information out there to expand on the content of this thread as well as subjects not included in this thread like global conferences (Example: Copenhagen Climate Conference), global religious movements (Example: The United Religions Initiative), global technology (Example: Implantable Tracking), Regional Alliances (Example: The European Union), etc.

However, I do hope the above information is enough evidence to show that such a push is indeed being made by the governments of the world.

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 05:22 PM
Nice layout! Well put together and a fantastic overview for anyone not already familiar with these plans.

Very good of you to add the prophecied "10 Kingdoms"!

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 05:32 PM
An excellent thread, Ashley...

I think the trend towards globalization has been evident for quite awhile.

America has been a global Superpower for a long time and was created on the back of the Industrial Revolution and subsequent creation of many economic industries/technologies. While some may view the following citation as an indication of the faltering American prominence/influence, it is rather a look at how globalization is more and more becoming a reality due to economic/coroprate interactions.

Apologies for the lengthy excerpt
Foreign companies are buying up our water systems, our power generating systems, our mines, and our few remaining factories. All because "flat world" so-called "free trade" policies have turned us from a nation of wealthy producers into a nation of indebted consumers, leaving the world awash in dollars that are most easily used to buy off big chunks of America. As notes, US Government statistics indicate the following percentages of foreign ownership of American industry:

� Sound recording industries - 97%
� Commodity contracts dealing and brokerage - 79%
� Motion picture and sound recording industries - 75%
� Metal ore mining - 65%
� Motion picture and video industries - 64%
� Wineries and distilleries - 64%
� Database, directory, and other publishers - 63%
� Book publishers - 63%
� Cement, concrete, lime, and gypsum product - 62%
� Engine, turbine and power transmission equipment - 57%
� Rubber product - 53%
� Nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing - 53%
� Plastics and rubber products manufacturing - 52%
� Plastics product - 51%
� Other insurance related activities - 51%
� Boiler, tank, and shipping container - 50%
� Glass and glass product - 48%
� Coal mining - 48%
� Sugar and confectionery product - 48%
� Nonmetallic mineral mining and quarrying - 47%
� Advertising and related services - 41%
� Pharmaceutical and medicine - 40%
� Clay, refractory, and other nonmetallic mineral products - 40%
� Securities brokerage - 38%
� Other general purpose machinery - 37%
� Audio and video equipment mfg and reproducing magnetic and optical media - 36%
� Support activities for mining - 36%
� Soap, cleaning compound, and toilet preparation - 32%
� Chemical manufacturing - 30%
� Industrial machinery - 30%
� Securities, commodity contracts, and other financial investments and related activities - 30%
� Other food - 29%
� Motor vehicles and parts - 29%
� Machinery manufacturing - 28%
� Other electrical equipment and component - 28%
� Securities and commodity exchanges and other financial investment activities - 27%
� Architectural, engineering, and related services - 26%
� Credit card issuing and other consumer credit - 26%
� Petroleum refineries (including integrated) - 25%
� Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments - 25%
� Petroleum and coal products manufacturing - 25%
� Transportation equipment manufacturing - 25%
� Commercial and service industry machinery - 25%
� Basic chemical - 24%
� Investment banking and securities dealing - 24%
� Semiconductor and other electronic component - 23%
� Paint, coating, and adhesive - 22%
� Printing and related support activities - 21%
� Chemical product and preparation - 20%
� Iron, steel mills, and steel products - 20%
� Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery - 20%
� Publishing industries - 20%
� Medical equipment and supplies - 20%

Link from 2006

Societal change takes a long time to implement as regional biases and prejudices are just now coming into global consideration, due to the implementation of a global communications system. While there will be hurdles to cross, the "New World Order" or Global Society is a trend that can be traced and viewed through a cursory look at economic interaction, in my opinion.

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 05:40 PM
The only question I have is how do people view the advancement of the civilization of the human species towards a unified and governed system of trade blocks which is being created as we speak by treaties created by elected and unelected officials as a conspiracy?

Its our future.. and Im all for it.

All this Alex Jones crap is just scaremongering for the receding of the US empire.

Yes, much of it is done in private.

Will I have that much fewer rights when it is done? No.

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 06:11 PM
your "ten kingdoms" maps is old and obsolete, as the idea it self. It was written almost 40 years ago by some old crunk that saw the world from his own perspective. surely you understand that ideas are just a tools for them to use, not the strict rules to fallow. the goal is rock solid, not the tools they use. just take today's and 40 years old world's maps and compare to your 10 kingdoms maps and you will see how flexible our masters are.
in any case, it should be removed from the list, because right know it just sits there not as a proof of something, but more as a compromising artefact. it compromising your conspiracy theories, not the master plan it self.

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 06:27 PM
I have posted this quote so many times I should probably just make it my signature.

But I really consider it to be a crucial piece of the puzzle.

This quote is from Julian Huxley, the brother of Aldous "Brave New World" Huxley.

He was the first director of The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and this quote is from UNESCO's own document which is still available on their website.

Julian Huxley (1887-1975) | First director of UNESCO Brother of Aldous.

"Political unification in some sort of world government will be required... Even though... any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable."

Taken from UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. Having come just one year after that appalling instance of widespread eugenics in the 3rd Reich it is staggering that this comment has never been taught in schools. This book is still available in its entirety from the Unesco website

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 06:34 PM
reply to post by AshleyD

Looking at all these conspiracy theories made me wonder why if you type in illuminati backwards and put it in a web site form it takes you to the NSA website. Why is that?

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 06:37 PM
a big player in centralising power is SERCO.
not sure if any of you folks have heard of that corporation before but im sure there was a thread on here about them once.
when you realise how many pies these guys have their fingers in you'll # bricks.

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 06:39 PM

Originally posted by Tim00
your "ten kingdoms" maps is old and obsolete, as the idea it self. It was written almost 40 years ago by some old crunk that saw the world from his own perspective.

I noticed ex. Yugoslavia is in the region 2 which is I presume EU, it doesn't exist any more as a federal republic but all its countries and few more are almost if not already in EU. Interestingly, Turkey's in the region 2 as well - it's still pending acceptance into EU, for about 20 years now.

By the way great work Ashley!

[edit on 20/1/2010 by SassyCat]

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 06:39 PM
reply to post by HoaglandIsMyHero

it took me to the NSA home page.
good find man, id never have thought of that.

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 06:41 PM
Dont let one theory, which is based on an interpretation of biblical prophecy, and as the mod said, an interesting side note, put you off what is some solid research and not at all conspiracy but first hand evidence.
Thanks Ashley great work which I hope to post to some friends that can’t see the bigger picture. I have no objection to the concept of a connected single human race, I just object to whom the people are that will, unless we educate ourselves, be in charge when the inevitable outcome occurs.
The GFO’s who use the government and governance organisations, backed by military power; don’t give two hoots about you and me and are intent on the creation of a global feudalistic state. Understanding the structures should help you ask the questions, what do these structures do? In any learning you must get the basics first and get a voice. Check of Haiti shock doctrine as a perfect example.

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 06:43 PM
i pulled this from another forum.

Domain servers in listed order:

For complete domain details go to:... Read more

But more interesting details on the dude can be found if you check the data on ITANIMULLI.ORG

it belongs to a John Fenley:
John Fenley

Registered through:, Inc. ( Read more

heres the #er
hes fascinated with darpa

what do you guys think?

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 07:10 PM
reply to post by HoaglandIsMyHero

Woah! What the hell is that all about?

Maybe someone bought the URL and redirected it to the NSA site as a joke?

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 07:10 PM
There's already a thread dedicated to the issue. It's a hoax using a simple redirect. I could teach you how to do it in 5 minutes. Without being too abrupt, it's very much old news:

OP: Great idea. Is there any chance that after a month or so we can consolidate the culmination of this study so that it's presentationally not in the shape and form of a thread.

It would be great if it was a continuous and read-only article void of posts. A sticky or locked singular post is not what I'm describing. I'm taking about a new facet of ATS. If this already exists please oblige me my pointing in it's direction.

[edit on 20-1-2010 by rexusdiablos]

[edit on 20-1-2010 by rexusdiablos]

[edit on 20-1-2010 by rexusdiablos]

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 07:20 PM
If you have a website of your own that supports PHP then simply create a page called itanimulli.php (not itanimulli.html) and paste the following piece of rudimentary code into it within the opening and closing php tags - ATS blocks them from being posted):

header( 'Location:' ) ;

No big mystery, no conspiracy and certainly nothing worthy of be called a 'hack'. Just an eejit trying to be clever and take advantage of good people like yourselves who are genuinely concerned about such issues an it looks like he's succeeded with some of you.

[edit on 20-1-2010 by rexusdiablos]

[edit on 20-1-2010 by rexusdiablos]

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 07:23 PM
Thanks for all the input, Everyone.

reply to post by MemoryShock

I think the trend towards globalization has been evident for quite awhile.

I definitely agree.
It seems we started seeing noticeable whispers of it in the 19th century (and some believe even before that) and it began to become blatantly obvious after WWI.

Thanks for the additional info. It does seem that some of these global organizations thrive on slavery via debt.

reply to post by Dermo

It really depends. There are three schools of thought as to how a one world government would pan out.

1). A nightmare resembling a global Communist China or Nazi Germany.
2). A so-so mix of prosperity, corruption, and hierarchy like in modern Western nations.
3). A Utopia.

Because it technically hasn't happened yet full force, we really don't know. We can connect the dots or view the modern world to see where it may lead. Looking at history, #1 and #2 seem the most likely. I personally believe it will be similar to #1 eventually.

reply to post by Tim00

As someone already pointed out, that was mentioned in the OP as being a side note of something I found interesting- not something this conspiracy is based on. I brought it up while I was on the subject but it was not wholly relevant. Just a tid bit I wanted to share. But I do agree with you in that it is not 'set in stone' zoning.


Thanks for everyone's thoughts. I do read everyone's posts.

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 07:39 PM
A few definitions in relation to the topic title:

Globalist / Globalism:

A national policy of treating the whole world as a proper sphere for political influence.


The act or process of globalizing : the state of being globalized; especially : the development of an increasingly integrated global economy marked especially by free trade, free flow of capital, and the tapping of cheaper foreign labor markets.


An underlying often ideological plan or program (a political agenda)

[edit on 20-1-2010 by rexusdiablos]

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 07:39 PM
reply to post by AshleyD

I definitely believe No.2 because no matter how much you push for a single system of governance, the world will always need thousands of automated economic regions under the control of regional blocs which will in turn be controlled by larger blocs who will be regulated by the global government. These will need to be capitalist to survive, governed differently because of cultural, political, wealth and religious differences and allow for freedom because that is what we have come to expect.

The world won't need a tight system of global governance until we have colonized several planets and have an interplanetary government... which is centuries away.

Usually the option that makes the most sense is the most likely.

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in