It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wookiep
Originally posted by whoshotJR
If you want to figure out more about earthquake depths
earthquake.usgs.gov...
I would also bet the main reason you don't see any changes in depth is because the tension was not actually released yet so these aftershocks would be like a person trying to get their car out of a parallel parking spot by ramming the person in front and back of them because they were too close. Unless those other cars move you would just keep hitting them in the same place on the bumper.
It was like 10 years ago I took the geology classes though so I'm an amateur at best.
No matter if you are amateur or not. :p At least you offered some sort of theory, so kudos. I wonder if/when the tension would actually be "released" tho. Would this be another worse quake or just a sort-of fizzle out effect?
Ummm. We just had a 6.5 in ca
Originally posted by DamaSan
Things we should be thinking about:
2) Unusual Natural Occurrence
Do these quakes fit the norm? Anything strange here? Seems to be a lot of noteworthy to significant quakes occurring around the world. Is there any data to support a link to Pole Shift? NEOs? Solar activity? Effects from Sagittarius A via Dark Rift? Any indication of irregular auroral activity?
Originally posted by DamaSan
3) Typical Natural Occurrence
Are these events insignificant from the perspective of geologic record? Is this par for the course?
Originally posted by np6888
neic.usgs.gov...
According to this link, we can see that the depth is very varied, except for the ones at 10 km. Even without looking at the specifics of the aftershocks, we can already conclude that these are man-made.