It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proof NASA Is Trying To Cover Up The Source Of The Norway Spiral!

page: 28
104
<< 25  26  27    29  30  31 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 09:20 AM
link   
It seems obvious to me and after 27 pages a conclusion has yet to be reached:
1) There was a rocket launched as seen in the first trail on the bottom right hand corner (seems pretty obvious), combined with the warnings of rocket test shots over a period of time that was issued by the Russian Minsitry of Defense. First a denial and then a confirmation is simplly a good indicator of Russian diplomacy (deny first) then addmit when it suits them.
So we have a scheduled rocket launch,,,
2) Cause and effect comes into play..
The rocket plume or trial implies that it went out of control and headed over a peaceful, policially neutral country (Norway) where the President of the United States is attending a Nobel Peace Awards Ceremony ( no coincenced there... uh huh..!)

3) Suddenly there is a spectacular exhibition in the sky that includes a spiraling beam of light headed in the exact direction of the wayward missile.

4) The wayward missle suddenly is gone no evidence on the ground of what happened to it. And an unexplainable phenomea in the sky so huge and geometrically perfect it defies explanation. Except that geometically perfect spirals have been associated with crop circles, early mysterious cultures and not thoroughly under stood sciences over the ages of archelogical pursuit..these spirals depicted in almost any and every civiliazation that appeared to have pursued the sciences from Kaballahism, to the Sumerians, the Mayans and the Egyptians..

5) AS it happens there is a the equivalant of a HAARP complex very close to the area where all this took place.

So all 5 factors (and I'm sure there are more not explainded or noted in this thread) are expected to be all Non-related events

My take ..a near catastrophy was averted by previously unknown technology that no one is willing to claim....or understands...and probably never will for many years to come if ever.




posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 09:25 AM
link   
Just read this on another site,make of it what you will;

A fellow countrywoman of mine (a schoolteacher), lives in Norway, and reported that she saw this thing live. She said it was about 7:50 am, she was driving to work, when se saw it in the sky, almost crashed her car. The stages according to her: - At first a pulsating green light in the middle, followed by a "firecracker" spinning around. - Then the black hole appeared, to be followed by a huge, expanding arc of light, which then developed into the spiral. She says it was an amazing experience, also many other people confirm that it was a sight that nobody could miss. I also have a report from someone who lives in central Finland (in Jyvaskyla), who said he saw this spiral low on the north-western sky. In the picture in this thread, the picture is taken in the direction of the rising sun (it was in the morning), which is roughly east. So to me it looks very much like (gathering all hard evidence) it was "the" russian missile. The thing that they do not want to tell us, is that it was a NUCLEAR DETONATION in SPACE. That's what caused the spiral/rings to expand so wide, that's what caused the black hole, and the bright light afterwards. Nobody has ever done a nuke test in space, nobody has seen what would happen. The russians do now. That's also the reason why they are denying that their test would have anything to do with this Norweigian phenomenon. This theory fits in every piece of evidence, confirmed or non-confirmed.



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 09:36 AM
link   

Ok so we have here: 1) CERN DIRECTOR admitting 1 month before, LHC could produce a door to another dimension that could bring somthing in or they could send something out. 2) LHC successfully collided particles together for the first time at record speeds, hours before the event in Norway. 3) Partial Reflection Medium-Frequency (MF) Atmospheric Radar Facility located in (Tromso)Ramfjordmoen, Norway recieving the data from CERN using the EISCAT to transfer the information after the collision. (Tromsø Geophysical Observatory's Ramfjordmoen field station) 4) Massive power use at EISCAT between 6am and 8am 5) Pics and Vids of unbelievable, never seen before lights and spirals in the sky from Tromsø, Norway, where the Russia admitting to a rocket test but not associating it to the lights that were seen.



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 09:37 AM
link   
www.reuters.com...

At the end of the video the Norwegian Military official says that Russia never announces their tests... So, once again, more proof that this is some sort of cover-up and that no one was told in advance that there was going to be a test of the Bulava missile... I'm not saying that the missile wasn't 'tested' but I'm willing to bet it's covering up what the blue spiral phenomenon really was/is.

[edit on 12-12-2009 by highlyoriginal]



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 09:39 AM
link   


4) Massive power use at EISCAT between 6am and 8am

can anyone verify this?



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 10:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by genius/idoit



4) Massive power use at EISCAT between 6am and 8am

can anyone verify this?


No.

The ionospheric heater was not on that night (during the launch), though other devices were. I have noted the hours of operation in the next image along with all the coordinates given by the Russians as areas that the launch might be occurring from (according to Frisnit, denoted by the yellow tacs):






Possible trajectory and launch location of the Dec. 9 missile:






And here is the simulated view from position of the Rocket/Spiral - it is facing towards Tromso where most of the pictures are from:




(the location is a close approximation)




I'd just like to say that most of you have been a real joy to work with.

I like the speculation that goes on, and I feel that our open-source investigation has been quite fruitful. We have accomplished a great deal.

To those of you were put down or attacked for your contributions, do not be dismayed. I have read all of your posts and I can say for certain that your submissions have been far more beneficial than those of your detractors.

Good Work!



[edit on 12-12-2009 by Exuberant1]



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 10:09 AM
link   
Okay there is no possible way after viewing this video that I believe that it was a missile... Check this video out.

Video is small but this is a direct link (better watched on page source below)
link.brightcove.com...

Click here for source of video full screen, just scroll down to watch the video (first video on the page)

[edit on 12-12-2009 by highlyoriginal]



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 10:18 AM
link   
reply to post by highlyoriginal
 


Good one, I still fail to see the rocket ..
Thnaks for the Vid !!



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 10:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by kirksteruk2k10
Typical ATS. We get TOLD what it was and people start chanting "BS" and coming up with the most fabricated alternative. Like anyone here would know what a failed missile is or what it's supposed to look like. Did you all become experts in failed missiles for the day and consider yourselves too high and mighty?


IMO, I've seen missiles take off, and fail, and never seen such a sheer perfectly stable effect.

It reads to me like :

Norway: Spiral in the sky ! Ohh!
TPTB: Ignore it, they'll pipe down. Deny it.
World: News Item for ratings - silly story on ufo's, wormhole's and no one knows, everyone denies knowledge according to the experts.! Cue X-Files music!
TPTB: It's word wide news now. Uhh, better make something up, Russia, you do it.
Russia: Umm We did it. Look, see! Ha! We lied, We're so naughty.
TPTB & The World: Case closed.

Shiney and clean, convenient.

I dunno, this to me is just more than it is - perhaps I've succumbed to the dark side... Use the conspiracy Luke... Oo






[edit on 12/12/2009 by Ha`la`tha]



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 10:39 AM
link   
reply to post by BetweenTheLine
 


Like conspiracy in a cycle,
Like a tale within the truth
Never ending nor beginning,
till your head blows through the roof
Like a parasol on a mountain,
Or a Chinese lantern
Just a spiral in the sky
Causing everyone concern...

Ahh Appy poly logies to Dusty..





posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 10:41 AM
link   
reply to post by highlyoriginal
 


In that video you can really see that the "black hole" is blacker than the surrounding sky.





[edit on 12-12-2009 by Point of No Return]



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 10:42 AM
link   
H.A.A.R.P. is suspicious as the cause of these phenomenon, although I know the Russians say they are to blame. I think however the Russians and the US are in cahoots developing a means to control the population of the planet. The entire H.A.A.R.P. facility was set up ostensibly to conduct weather experiments but some suspect it is some kind of mind control device. This material that explains that we can be manipulated on a cellular level, by tapping into "programmable" DNA using light and sound...

www.soulsofdistortion.nl...

DNA programming

start quote from their pages
"The most astonishing experiment that was performed by Garjajev’s group is the reprogramming of the DNA codon sequences using modulated laser light. From their discovered grammatical syntax of the DNA language they were able to modulate coherent laser light and even radio waves and add semantics (meaning) to the carrier wave. In this way they were able to reprogram in vivo DNA in living organisms, by using the correct resonant frequencies of DNA. The most impressive discovery made so far is that spoken language can be modulated to the carrier wave with the same reprogramming effect. Now this is a baffling and stunning scientific discovery! Our own DNA can simply be reprogrammed by human speech, supposing that the words are modulated on the correct carrier frequencies!

Whereas western science uses complicated bio chemical processes to cut and paste DNA triplets in the DNA molecule, Russian scientist use modulated laser light to do exactly the same thing. The Russians have proven to be very successful in repairing damaged DNA material in vivo!


Winter and his heart coherence team have found proof that human emotions can reprogram DNA as well. The sonic beatings of the heart in rhythm with our feelings, our emotions, are transformed into electromagnetic energy in the body’s glands that act like piezoelectric couplers creating smaller electromagnetic counterpart wavelengths of the emotional sounds of the heart. The emotion becomes energy in motion, e-motion, sending it right down to the DNA of every cell of our body as blue coherent laser light that is able to modulate the DNA codons just like the lasers of the Russians did.

On close examination from the top view of the DNA it has a dodecahedron shape. It takes ten Phi spirals to create the dodecahedral helical shape of the DNA spiral. The DNA molecule as a wave shape is attuned to the heart and able to receive its sonic emotions. Daniel Winter explains the implosion of long waves into short waves as the mechanism that conveys the emotions of the heart to our DNA. The scale (wavelength) is different but the ratio of the wavelengths is the same maintaining the Golden Mean ratio. Not only do emotions feed our DNA with blue ultraviolet light, but also cellular metabolism, the consumption of food, is all about creating short wave blue light that feeds our DNA. Plants receive this light directly from the Sun using chlorophyll in their leaves and use a process called photosynthesis to bind the photons of the Sun. Animals consuming these plants get these bio photons indirectly from plants, the accumulation however has become less effective. Eventually the coherent light of the Sun is stored as bio photons in the organism. The purpose of the metabolisms in both plants and animals is to create highly coherent ultraviolet laser light inside the DNA that drives cell replication.

Bio wave computer

The wave processing and modulating properties of DNA have revealed a total new purpose for the DNA molecule. For a long time we have believed that the only purpose for DNA was that it served as the carrier of genetic information for the reproduction of life. This now seems to be only half of the equation.

Garjajev and others in a paper titled the ‘DNA wave Biocomputer’ postulates that DNA is no less than an intelligent biological computer. " end quote



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 10:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by highlyoriginal
Okay there is no possible way after viewing this video that I believe that it was a missile... Check this video out.

Video is small but this is a direct link (better watched on page source below)
link.brightcove.com...

Click here for source of video full screen, just scroll down to watch the video (first video on the page)

[edit on 12-12-2009 by highlyoriginal]


That is where I itch my noggin. People have claimed contrast, illumination of the surrounding area, makes the darkness stand out - BANANAS!

If you have a plane that flies in the sky writing "I love you Nancy!" and the plane suddenly explodes, it does not take with it the smoke/vapour that it wrote. It also get more noticable during the explosion.

A rocket exploding and leaving a trail, is not perfectly concentric, and when extinguished would not merely blink out, causing an expansion of darkness to engulf the glowing area it created.

I've seen the sims, I've seen other examples, and IMO, the sims are made to replicate the event, hence influenced, and other examples IMO again, show either a: nothing like this, or b: the truth is not being told for sure.

Waaayy to much wrong with this. and Im not a moon breather dude.....

I just don't feel this sits right.

(edit, One word, just one word... that I saw.. i hate my fingers)


[edit on 12/12/2009 by Ha`la`tha]



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 11:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by rusethorcain
H.A.A.R.P. is suspicious as the cause of these phenomenon




No it was nibiru hitting the rings of saturn prematurely, that caused an ephemeral and localised ring-like phenomenon to appear over the closest ionised magnetic gravitational feild to it, collating in the spindle like excitement of the photons and other emitted particles leading to an engaged specific manner of appearance.

Do get your facts right.

I know, I am a scientifology expert!



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 11:08 AM
link   
Check this out on YouTube:



SALT I is the common name for the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks Agreement, also known as Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty. SALT I froze the number of strategic ballistic missile launchers at existing levels, and provided for the addition of new submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) launchers only after the same number of older intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and SLBM launchers had been dismantled.

Negotiations lasted from November 17, 1969 until May 1972 in a series of meetings beginning in Helsinki, with the U.S. delegation headed by Gerard C. Smith, director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. Subsequent sessions alternated between Vienna and Helsinki. After a long deadlock, the first results of SALT I came in May 1971, when an agreement was reached over ABM systems. Further discussion brought the negotiations to an end on May 26, 1972 in Moscow when Richard Nixon and Leonid Brezhnev signed the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and the Interim Agreement Between The United States of America and The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on Certain Measures With Respect to the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms. A number of agreed statements were also made. This helped improve relations between the USA and the Soviet Union.

It was a controversial experiment of negotiations between Jimmy Carter and Leonid Brezhnev from 1977 to 1979 between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which sought to curtail the manufacture of strategic nuclear weapons. It was a continuation of the progress made during the SALT I talks. SALT II was the first nuclear arms treaty which assumed real reductions in strategic forces to 2,250 of all categories of delivery vehicles on both sides. SALT II helped the U.S. to discourage the Soviets from arming their third generation ICBMs of SS-17, SS-19 and SS-18 types with many more MIRVs. In the late 1970s the USSR's missile design bureaus had developed experimental versions of these missiles equipped with anywhere from 10 to 38 thermonuclear warheads each. Additionally, the Soviets secretly agreed to reduce Tu-22M production to thirty aircraft per year and not to give them an intercontinental range. It was particularly important for the US to limit Soviet efforts in the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) rearmament area. The SALT II Treaty banned new missile programs (a new missile defined as one with any key parameter 5% better than in currently deployed missiles), so both sides were forced to limit their new strategic missile types development although US preserved their most essential programs like Trident and cruise missiles, which President Carter wished to use as his main defensive weapon as they were too slow to have first strike capability. In return, the USSR could exclusively retain 308 of its so-called "heavy ICBM" launchers of the SS-18 type.

An agreement to limit strategic launchers was reached in Vienna on June 18, 1979, and was signed by Leonid Brezhnev and President of the United States Jimmy Carter. In response to the refusal of the U.S. Congress to ratify the treaty, a young member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Senator Joseph Biden of Delaware, met with the Soviet Foreign Minister Andrey Gromyko, "educated him about American concerns and interests" and secured several changes that neither the U.S. Secretary of State nor President Jimmy Carter could obtain.

Six months after the signing, the Soviet Union deployed troops to Afghanistan, and in September of the same year senators including Henry M. Jackson and Frank Church discovered the so-called "Soviet brigade" on Cuba. In light of these developments, the treaty was never formally ratified by the United States Senate. Its terms were, nonetheless, honored by both sides until 1986 when the Reagan Administration withdrew from SALT II after accusing the Soviets of violating the pact.




These strategic ballistic missile launchers is what I think needs concentrated on and the fuel used at the three locations, China 1988, Russia 2007 and Norway 2009. I also think there was another missile failure in Russia the day after the Norway 2009 incident.

Here is a video regarding what the fuel might have been (ALICE):



[edit on 12/12/2009 by the_denv]



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 11:36 AM
link   
Sorry, but IMHO that is no missile.. A missile spinning out of control is going to spin left right, up down, side to side, dart in one direction, then another, then spin some more, It will be out of control, it will not be stabilized in the same exact spot the whole time, facing the same direction on a dime..Simple physics should tell you that.. Second, when an ICBM is launched, the whole world knows because it shows up on radar, so the fact that every military had no clue in the beginning, bs.. And the other videos of missiles malfunctioning, while may look a little similar, look nothing like that. The masses always think, "well the news, gov, or a scientist said so on T.V., it must be true, no worries, back to American Idol and football games, nothing to see here, move along. I am not claiming to know what it is exactly, but its not a missile. Use logic, simple reasoning, physics, and maybe just a tiny (not much) bit of common sense.


Deebo



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 11:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Deebo
 


I know what you mean, at first I thought it was some kind of microwave weapon or some phenomenon (wormhole etc), then as I read Phage's info about it being a rocket I began to think that it could very well be.

Although dont get me wrong, Im still as lost as the rest of you. Im trying to see if it IS in fact a rocket. Im still researching like the rest of you.



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 11:58 AM
link   
Check this old flick out, from 86, "howard the duck" watch it starting at about 4:40... That's what it looks like.. Not saying its true but seems a lil similar.

When/if a pop-up screen comes up, close it.. Movie is on first screen/tab.

www.megavideo.com...


Deebo

[edit on 12-12-2009 by Deebo]



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 12:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by np6888
www.youtube.com...

Makes no sense to me that you'd test it, on the day that Obama was coming there.


Funny you should mention that, actually...

Especially considering the fact that when Obama visited Canada recently, We had to scramble our jets towards our northern airspace, as they (Russia) were running a covert 'training mission' with their bombers in OUR airspace...

But no... They'd NEVER test it on a day that Obama was in the area.

Never.



J

[edit on 12-12-2009 by jephers0n]



posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 12:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Deebo
Sorry, but IMHO that is no missile.. A missile spinning out of control is going to spin left right, up down, side to side, dart in one direction, then another, then spin some more, It will be out of control, it will not be stabilized in the same exact spot the whole time, facing the same direction on a dime..Simple physics should tell you that.. Second, when an ICBM is launched, the whole world knows because it shows up on radar, so the fact that every military had no clue in the beginning, bs.. And the other videos of missiles malfunctioning, while may look a little similar, look nothing like that. The masses always think, "well the news, gov, or a scientist said so on T.V., it must be true, no worries, back to American Idol and football games, nothing to see here, move along. I am not claiming to know what it is exactly, but its not a missile. Use logic, simple reasoning, physics, and maybe just a tiny (not much) bit of common sense.


Deebo



Are you a rocket scientist Deebo? I'm not sure if you've taken the time to read through the rebuttals to the "it's not a rocket" claims, but they also include videos of very similar rocket failures.... but rocket failure can mean a number of different things and not necessarily one that is spinning out of control.

If you do some research on failed rocket launches you might discover that they can and do spin in a uniform circular motion, which creates some sort of spiral with it's exhaust... Just look back through any of the threads going on about this Norway spiral.

Of course the "it can't be a rocket" crowd would like to believe that this particular incident resembles nothing of a failed rocket launch even thought there's been plenty of evidence showing quite the opposite. Mainly:

The plume that squiggles and rises from the ground right after launch
The spiral effect in the sky
Even the blue trail

Go back and do some exploring before you state your case as definitive, unless of course you are a rocket scientist, at which point I'll put my shoe in my mouth.



new topics

top topics



 
104
<< 25  26  27    29  30  31 >>

log in

join