It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1) Be polite. Above all, we take pride in the fact that AboveTopSecret.com is renowned as a destination for civil and polite discussion of nearly anything. Treat your fellow ATS members with respect, and your time here will be rewarding.
Originally posted by s373r3d
Only in that last 100 years did we discover that Newton was wrong about gravity. Then comes Einstein.
I consider design, purpose, direction, intelligence undeniable in life/biology and I attribute its ultimate source to a genius mind! By faith yes, but also by observation leading to what I feel is a logical conclusion.
You are regurgitating old information and NO, I am NOT lying Dawkins Doesn't know what our common ancestor is, what it looks like and can only SUPPOSE one.
Originally posted by lifecitizen
I consider design, purpose, direction, intelligence undeniable in life/biology and I attribute its ultimate source to a genius mind! By faith yes, but also by observation leading to what I feel is a logical conclusion.
Well, you can consider that and even believe it but you have no proof that what you see stems from a genius mind.
On the other hand there is abundant proof for evolution and natural selection.
Originally posted by rnaa
This is clearly a trolling thread.
The 'problems' listed in the opening post have been posted (in various forms) in many other threads where they have been answered directly, completely, and politely.
In no case that I can find has the poster attempted to debate the rebuttals in anyway shape or form. Instead they purposely and maliciously pick out those threads from impatient and frustrated posters and attack them as non-responsive and assumptive of the original posters belief system as if those frustrated posters are the only ones that are attempting to engage the original poster.
Invariably, the arguments against the original 'problems with evolution' proposition are totally ignored. As they obviously would be, because the 'problems' have been answered over and over and over again on multiple threads and web sites.
The posters purpose is clearly not to deny ignorance or gain answers to their questions. The only purpose seems to be to engage in silly word games about who is making unwarranted assumptions about whose belief system or anything that will keep the argument going.
I have an hypothesis: these threads, which seem to be regenerated on a fairly regular cycle of about a month (research required) are being propagated by a group of people who couldn't care less about the topic, but are engaged in a game, there is probably a bet involved on who can pull the most responses with their tripe. This constitutes a clear conspiracy, don't you think?
An alternate hypothesis: these threads are less than subtle advertisements for the authors that the material is sourced from.
Now that this is in plain view, I wonder how this can be tested? The Heisenberg principle would no doubt apply.
Originally posted by dodadoom
To Lifecitizen.
What a matter you still mad at lil' ol' me?
I am not still ignoring you, obviously I read your informative and well thought out and just really nice post.
Are you here to bash too and spout hate towards me? Seems so.
I dont suppose you read anything I have just posted have you?
There are many here who I dont see eye to eye with.
However look at my friends list and you will see many on there as well.
I appreciate all comments, even childish ones attacking me personally
and adding nothing to the thread as others have done. IMO
If you can find it in your heart to forgive me for any hurt I've caused you,
I would appreciate it. I have already appologized to you and will again,
if need be.
It takes a bigger man to do that than one who won't.
One grown up enough to admit he is not perfect but who is always trying
to be a better person with more patience!
Do you would understand any of that?
If I may be so bold, what is your take on the evolution thingy?
Or was your post strictly to suck up to me? Peace.
Edit:
Sometimes the best of friendships can come out of the worst beginnings!
[edit on 16-11-2009 by dodadoom]
They do this using questions like "who designed the designer?" which is an infinite regress of circular logic they are fully aware of but so am I. It is supposed to undermine the concept by showing the designer is presupposed and cannot be explained. ...
Perhaps we use science in many ways to control the masses. Me I think the whole control the masses thing is HOGWASH.
The idea for science to spend time wondering about how whales lost their legs.
They have looked at the DNA of whales (hox c6-c10) and could find no trace of vestigial genes. Perhaps it is because they never had any legs!
How do you make a whale? Clearly, you don't just "lose" the genes required to make hind limbs. You have to revise and add to the control information for existing banks of regulatory genes involved in limb formation.
The main players in limb formation, the genes Sonic hedgehog (Shh), the Fgfs, and the transcription factor Hand2, are all still present and fully functional in these animals.
This whale for instance, uses those limbs deep within the core of its body as arms would an oar at depths it must conserve body heat and save energy using a slower paced form of propulsion while, it can transfer more blood to the extremities flukes and fins where other muscles are incorporated in a more direct propeller propulsion effort.
this marvelous mutation called sonar, the kind we can't begin to match,
all that "junk DNA" evolutionists used to call it, isn't junk after all.
The Bible was just a book written by men!
Umm Yeah, SO?
So is every science book I have ever read.
And what was the last science book you read that demanded you obey it because it we the divine word of god? the last one that said you must give a certain part of your wages to the church or forever face hellfire? the last one that ended like revelations?
Either religion is always right or it has no right to tell me what to do....
Science doesn't try to tell people what to do, it provides proof and evidence of how the world actually works - moral theory, politics, etc are the secular sciences of how to treat each other - evolution certainly doesn't try and suggest anything other than a theory (proven) of how life came to exist.
...what evolution does, is assume evolution is true first, THEN they make their interpretations based on those assumptions as they have always done.
To keep the idea alive they have resorted to post modernist semantics calling it a fact when their is NO such consensus and the altenberg 16 proved that because they cannot agree on a damn thing.
The book, will the real, evolution please stand up" convicts the reader to either face the facts or continue as a fool.
... the fact Intelligent Design presupposes an unexplained designer is not a problem anymore than it is for gravity
...As for DNA, one of the most perplexing issues of morphology is that DNA will not ALLOW a FRACTION of the mutation errors they had thought it did. In fact, it more or less reboots itself after only two generations to the default template of the life form it is instructed to build to already digitally hard coded specifications...
...
The idea for science to spend time wondering about how whales lost their legs.
They have looked at the DNA of whales (hox c6-c10) and could find no trace of vestigial genes. Perhaps it is because they never had any legs!
...However, scientific hypothesis make presuppositions all the time. String Theory was built on the presupposition of extra-dimensional reality at subatomic level. It would be impossible to create a theory that predicts extra-dimensions without presupposing they exist.
Evolution presupposes evolution is true
...and have merged distinctly different definitions of those observed and those unobserved and unproven by suggesting micro evolution is macro evolution long term
...and follow using some anecdote to illustrate traveling to another state as if the state were another species.
...
What anti-IDists try to do is to either re-define science to include only “natural” processes,
as if intelligent causes are non-natural, or try to tie ID to the supernatural.
They think that if ID is tied to the supernatural then it has violated some arbitrary rule of science.
Originally posted by IrnBruFiend
I didn't realise one word posts were frowned upon haha.
No that's some great information you posted. Evolution is the biggest scientific disaster of the century. Evidence will never corroborate with Darwin's theory of evolution because it's a scientific non-starter.
DNA evidence proves this.
Let's simplify this.
All primates have 48 chromosomes.
All humans have 46 chromosomes.
This 'missing' chromosome has infact been fused together somehow.
This is not a result of evolution as it is scientifically, impossible.