Is this it? Is this the smoking gun of the existence of the Yeti?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 05:34 PM by agentofchaos
reply to post by Wormwood Squirm



Please tell me how else are we suppose to get evidence of the yeti? Who would you have find the evidence so its more beleiveable for you? Is the only way you'll beleive something is if the news tells you? or if youtube tells you? How many people even have the resources to travel around to all these different places and try and find all these different things? Again, I'm not saying I beleive or don't beleive, but what I am saying is I will write the show and tell him I want those samples sent around and want to hear about it and the alien skeleton in later episodes...if you get enough people saying that then I'm sure we can get something more conclusive, but then again that would be doing something constructive instead of just hating...

[edit on 6-11-2009 by agentofchaos]

[edit on 6-11-2009 by agentofchaos]


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 06:42 PM by Wormwood Squirm
reply to post by agentofchaos



If that chunk of hair was indeed from some apelike Yeti then it would already be making its rounds in the scientific community. Is it? I doubt it, because it is a prop for a show.
No hate required. Just simple common sense. It is not my fault if you do not understand or see this for what it is. Good luck on your search for Bigfoot but you won't be finding Bigfoot on a TV program presented by idiots created to entice in order to sell ads.

TO Add:
The producers of that show sat back in luxury and ate a big fat juicy steak with salad tonight while sipping on expensive wine. Do you know how they paid for that? From viewers like yourself, going "oooo ahhh wow Big foot Yeti wow" while sitting through Kraft commercials every 8 minutes that the guy sold for a hefty price due to the fact there are so many gullible people on the planet who will sit and stare at these programs which revolve around flimsy pieces of evidence that have never been proven. A bunch of hype is added as flavor.


[edit on 6-11-2009 by Wormwood Squirm]


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:35 PM by Wormwood Squirm
reply to post by Titen-Sxull



I am not pretending anything. That discovery is invalid. Plain and simple. It is not a discovery at all. It is entertainment so don't roll your eyes at me and agree at the same time. That makes no sense.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:41 PM by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by Wormwood Squirm



I'm saying even a bunch of pseudoscientific amateurs can make legitimate discoveries and we shouldn't slam the door on this hair sample until more is learned about it and more results are gathered. So I agree its a piece of entertainment, not science, but I disagree that it can be said for certain the hair sample is a fake without more info.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:53 PM by Dogdish
Originally posted by Hopllyte
I live where there are more trees than people. I have found footprints and have taken photos. I have found a bed made out of branches as thick as my arm, seemly snapped from near by tree like twigs. I have also found young trees literally snapped in half forming a perimieter around the bedding area. And the cherry on top was a mound or rocks, stacked in a column. But the smallest rocks on the top were very large, weighing aleast 200+ pounds. Being American Indian, there are thing you do not fool with. So I took the photo from a distance, but if I had something to show the scale the mound was about 7 feet high.


I can attest to the fact that you do not want to fool with this thing. I had a very close encounter with one, coincidentally very near the border of a New York State tribe's reservation, and the experience was so frightening as to be surreal.
About the show, I have to agree with groingrinder. Many years in the woods, and a lot of it as a hunter makes the show very difficult to watch, as they stomp around in dark. The subject matter however, is interesting enough to make me watch, although I missed this episode.
Trouble is; they have to communicate with the camera as the audience, and who would watch if they didn't speak or engage in some sort of hunt? I think the "hokey" chases in the dark are the lesser of two evils, without them; there would be no show, and this evidence (if that's what this is) would not have been found.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 08:12 PM by agentofchaos
reply to post by Wormwood Squirm



First, don't pretend to know me, I don't own a T.V. and if I do watch the show it's on the web. Second, not one of those questions anwsered, so yes it is a T.V. show, but I don't know if that hair is or isn't making its way through the rounds right now as I don't handle that, but can you divinitively say it's not, then please give me the info(via link) if you got it or in general point me in the right direction to look that says its not in circulation so that we can shut the book on this case...

and further again I didn't say I beleive; I'm just saying I'm waiting until more facts are presented as I'm sure this is building steam...


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 09:44 PM by Wormwood Squirm
Originally posted by agentofchaos
reply to
post by Wormwood Squirm



First, don't pretend to know me, I don't own a T.V. and if I do watch the show it's on the web. Second, not one of those questions anwsered, so yes it is a T.V. show, but I don't know if that hair is or isn't making its way through the rounds right now as I don't handle that, but can you divinitively say it's not, then please give me the info(via link) if you got it or in general point me in the right direction to look that says its not in circulation so that we can shut the book on this case...

and further again I didn't say I beleive; I'm just saying I'm waiting until more facts are presented as I'm sure this is building steam...


I find it hilarious some of you take offense to my blunt opinion.

Provide you with a link? LMAO that says it DEFINITIVELY (correct spelling) is not a Yeti. Don't be absurd please. Do your own footwork pal

[edit on 6-11-2009 by Wormwood Squirm]


reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 04:26 AM by Ridhya
reply to post by Titen-Sxull


Thats why wormwood make such a good point though. What happens every time CNN gets desperate for more viewers? They have a new larry King aliens episode. Gets people to watch who dont care about the news.

How would this show even EXIST? It would be every episode, we basically go camping with expensive gear with nothing happening. So they fake something that piques your interest! How do we know? Look at EVERY episode it is the same damn template.

-background of the creature
-gearing up and some lame jokes
-talk to locals
-camping in the dark
-somehow manage to find some intriguing evidence
-get it tested with the invariable result 'inconclusive'

I could write them a whole season of new stuff. EVERY SINGLE EPISODE leaves you wanting more, hmm maybe THIS particular evidence (dna) did not turn up positive, but that freaky video footage, whoa! Tune in next time!
...without them 'finding' evidence no one would watch. So I believe if nothing happens they fake it.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Strange creatures from Marianas Trench
  Posted 4 days ago with 26 member flags
\'Woolly mammoth\' caught on camera in Siberia
  Posted 2 days ago with 18 member flags
icelandic lake monster spotted! (VIDEO)
  Posted 4 days ago with 16 member flags
The Bridgewater Triangle
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
Bigfoot Attack...or is the Lizard Man in Georgia?
  Posted 9 days ago with 5 member flags
\'mutant spider fears at nuclear wastelab\'
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
Shape-Shifting Dinosaurs by Jack Horner (TED Talk)
  Posted 0 days ago with 4 member flags