Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
This confusion generally does not occur when people stay at home in their own nations. That there was some blowback from forcing tens upon tens of
thousands of indigenous people out of Palestine at gunpoint over the Lebanese border to ethnically cleanse a stolen territory is not a surprise to me
friend. Is it really a surprise to you?
So it's OK for YOU to hang out in Lebanon, but not me, right? Must be because you think you're on the "right" side of things.
The rest of that diatribe is a matter of opinion as well. "Stolen" territory my great aunt Fanny. Ditto on the "ethnic cleansing". Means squat,
except in propoganda comsumption.
Those refugees were settled WHEN again? That's a lot of blowback.
That both Hezbollah and the PLO where fighting a common enemy from a front line terrain does not make them any more intertwined than Americans at
Omaha Beach and the British at Sword.
No, but the intercooperation and mutual assistance, makes them closer than, say, hottentots and hamburgers.
You DO know that Hizbollah provided "services" to the Palestinian camps, same as the Lebanese Shia camps, right?
It’s a nice way to excuse the blatant deception you were called on which since you attempt to infer you were there in the ‘thick’ of things as a
foreign interloper in Lebanon’s Civil War you certainly would know that the Palestinians and Hezbollah were not an aligned or affiliated
organization. Hezbollah was formed by Shia in the South to counter Amas backed by Syria friend.
Interloper? I've been called worse. I'll take that as a kindness. You mean Amal. Syrian backed Amal. Yeah, I know that's why Hizbollah was formed,
to answer that and counter it. They fought each other like devils at times too, to get that point across. Still doesn't change the facts of life
vis-a-vis cooperative and mutual support funtions between Hizbollah and the PLO. Not that it matters much anymore, given the current status of the
PLO. They sure as hell didn't shun the Palestinians, as you imply!
Israel simply became a common enemy when it invaded and provided cover for Lebanese Christian Militias to attack the Palestinian refugee camps.
Israel invaded with intent to stop the cross border attack by the PLO from their safe havens. Hizbollah took exception to the invasion, and it was the
birth of a beautiful partnership.
It could be argued that much of what caused destabilization inside progressive and affluent Lebanon was the Palestinian issue Israel forced on it when
it drove thousands upon thousands of unarmed peaceful Palestinian civilians over the Lebanese border and refused to allow them to return making them
Lebanon’s problem.
It could also be argued that those "peaceful" Palestinians were run out of Israel for cause, and took up screwing with the Lebanese government as
well, causing destabilization. Peaceful folk don't generally go around destabilizing countries. Of course, I see where you get the quaint notion of
the PLO being a garden club. After all, Arafat DID get a Nobel Peace prize, didn't he?
It boggles the mind.
However I do appreciate your qualified attempt to stand corrected with less humiliating deflections, as it is more than most of the people who also
willfully posted erroneous information have been inclined to do.
When I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and I'll own it. No need for humiliation or deflection, since I was the wrong one on that point, not you. I do take
exception to the insinuation that I "willfully" posted erroneous material. Had that been the case, ain't no way I'd back down from it. In other
words, if I'd done it WILLFULLY, I'd never admit it.
Hezbollah is a credible political faction, civic and military organization. I personally consider many of Israel’s actions to also be terrorism and
it is for disingenuous reasons that popularly accepted factions in their own countries are labeled as terrorists for simply valuing their own freedoms
and sovereignty and having the courage to fight against a much better funded and backed enemy that wants to dominate them. I wouldn’t go so far as
to call Hezbollah Freedom Fighters like we do when once again for propaganda purposes we are looking for a level of support gained simply through
perception and distinction as opposed to the fact. Last century’s freedom fighters in Afghanistan are this century’s terrorists. The reality is
nothing about them has changed except how Western Governments and Media want to exploit them and the purposes they want to exploit them for.
Hizbollah is a "credible political faction" now, because they've gained power in Lebanon. Wasn't always so, but everyone starts out small. In the
same way, the Sandinistas became a "credible political faction" in Nicaragua, after they beat the country into submission amd took over. I still
wouldn't hang out around Daniel Ortega's pool for a beer with him.
Be that as it may, I'm quoted all over ATS as saying that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, so you'll get no argument from me
there. God knows I've run into enough of both camps, and the simple fact is it's true.
If you're insinuating that the Taliban and the mujahideen of the 80's in Afghanistan are the same folks, you're dead wrong. I've posted
extensively all over ATS about that,too, and won't retype it here again. If you'd like, I can provide links to the original posts for you, But I'm
not gonna cramp myself typing all that out all over again.
I reject the so called war on terror as robbing people of the dignity to be self determining and sovereign as we seek to infringe upon their
sovereignty and tyrannize them for various forms of economic and political exploitation.
That is of course your right. Myself, I got nothing against killing folk that intend to kill me, and have demonstrated a willingness to do so by
killing others of my kind, unprovoked, or supporting and aiding those who have.
I reject all governments who wish to brainwash people in this or any fashion.
That brainwashing business works both ways, but I get your point, even if I don't necessarily agree.
Sounds like a pretty disturbing reading comprehension problem to me considering you yourself admitted saying that Hezbollah was a Palestinian
Organization.
Ah yes, but that was AFTER you had already started blowing the smoke.
Visit an optometrist reread the thread. I was responding to people who were claiming that this was proof that Palestinians are buying weapons instead
of food.
If you can't make a point without trying to be insulting and condescending, then I suppose I win by default. It weakens your position, as a desperate
attempt to strengthen it. I stand by the assertion that Hizbollah suports the Palestinian cause. Chucking rockets into Israel is NOT defending against
invaders, it's pissing off a dragon, trying to drive them out of their own territory for... you guessed it, the Palestinians to take over again. If
that ain't support, I don't know what is.
I wonder if I could get some of them to come over here and kill off my neighbors so I can increase my yard space? Nah, just kidding. I don't like
mowing all that much.
As far as admitting your error this is one of the most qualified admissions of error I have ever seen and just like yesterday every one was trying to
make Hezbollah be a Palestinian organization now we are going to try to pretend I some how tricked them into doing that?
Can you say desperate? I bet you can!
Of course I can. Look above. I did. I didn't say you tricked 'em into saying Hizbollah was Palestinian, I said you used that charge as a smokescreen
to obfuscate the issue. Sort of like now.
There is no proven crime at hand friend. Courts of Law determine if a crime has occurred and not the media and not internet forum gangs. I simply
responded to the very real act of an aggressor nation in an act of piracy. I have demonstrated on this thread how it easy it is to fill out a Bill of
Lading.
I agree no crime has been proven as yet. Unfortunately, piracy is a crime, and you've made that charge, and convicted Israel of it in your own mind,
without a hearing of all the facts. You've made assumptions to base your case on. Just because a bill of lading CAN be faked, doesn't mean it WAS.
ID's CAN be faked, but I'll bet yours is real. Of course, using your logic, I can "prove" it isn't.
We are a long way from knowing the facts of this issue and we will never establish facts of this issue should a court of law not rule on it after a
credible investigation of all the evidence. American Justice Standards are high friend and so are people’s with critical minds.
Agreed. That's why I feel it's unfair of you to charge piracy and assume guilt before reviewing all evidence. American Justice wouldn't be the
standard, though, Maritime Law would.
When you get done debating yourself, which is in reality all you are doing please let me know and we can discuss debating about the Habiru all six
thousand years of their history friend. I am on ATS on the heels of a conspiracy not your run of the mill amateur propaganda and deflection for
political purposes.
If you can’t debate in honest good faith in a credible manner then I can assure you I have no interest. So far you haven’t done that, and while
you will look for more ways to qualify that and put that on me…that be on you!
I'm ready whenever you are. It will of necessity include more than just the Habiru, though. That's only the dim mists of one side of the story, now
isn't it?
Love that superiority thing you have going on. It's cute. Sorry, I couldn't resist, given the condescention in your tone.