Police take advantage of drunk girl, police state resource thread., page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 53 times


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 05:48 PM by paraclete1
Originally posted by GovtFlu
Originally posted by MegaCurious
reply to
post by alyosha1981



...As far as the video; those guys were just being guys who got flirted with by some hot tart.. I didn't see a victim, just consenting adults playing the game of life...


If the woman hadn't been intoxicated, then I might agree that there wasn't a victim. But according to the report she was and if that's the case, I feel she was a victim simply in the fact that the police shouldn't take advantage of anyone in that condition. There's a big difference in a woman throwing herself at a man and a man putting his hands on her and taking photos.

On the other hand, there are laws about public intoxication. If they'd arreste her for that, then this thread would have been about a passenger being arrested after her driver got arrested.

But in this situation, the bottom line is that the officers were wrong. And while one was fired, the other quit. So in my mind, I tend to believe that he knew what he did was wrong.

But still, being a man, I can't help wonder what the outcry would have been if an intoxicated man was fondled and photographed after throwing himself at an all woman department?


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:10 PM by Phenomium
Originally posted by antonia
Originally posted by Ha`la`tha
reply to
post by Retikx


Love the excuses tho guys. Will have to remember it the next time a woman is raped or abused; if she was drunk then she deserved it.

Right on brothas.





Except most misogynist idiots would be quite quick to say any woman who gets drunk is asking for it. That's a common defense in court and it works. I remember a man was acquitted because his victim somehow convinced him to use a condom. There's a lot of people out there who hate women and I have no idea why.



REALLY?????? You have no idea why???? REALLY???? Maybe it's the nepotistic relationship between the government and women. Women always get favored in court cases, jobs, child custody cases....everything. And don't tell me that women get less money in jobs either. Everywhere I have worked in the past 8 years, (and that's quite a few places) there has been nothing but women managers. they were good managers too, they didn't deserve what they got. The men in one place I worked all got relieved of their jobs as managers and replaced by women. One woman even became the manager or 2 areas at one time and 2 men had to lose their jobs because of her. I get so tired of women getting handed everything on a silver platter and then claiming that men are victimizing them and that they get lower wages......it's all just lies and everyone knows it. It's just that most men are cowards and afraid to speak out for fear of reprisal by the government or by feminist organizations placed to destroy male opportunity while aiding women to "replace" them or abdicate their present jobs. Or they just simply think that they will "score" with the women because they are led to believe so. I have been sexually accosted by women at work lately to the point of embarassment. It seems THEY can sexually harass me, but if men do it...we get slaughtered! What's worse is women can't see that anything is wrong....and why should they? There is NOTHING wrong on their side of the fence. Nothing to fix if it isn't broken right? Well it is destroyed on the man's side of the fence because of how the government coddles women these days .......................now you know why so many of us "mysoginists", (if that's what you prefer to call men that are fed up with government favored sexist agenda)............are angry with women today. If you don't believe me...then you'll just keep on wondering why men are mad at women for doing nothing at all......it must be that we are jealous of you for having lower pay or for being opressed by us.

[edit on 1-11-2009 by Phenomium]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:12 PM by infidel666
reply to post by Unleashed68



I hope your speaking for yourself my friend. I personally don't take advantage of people. I agree this is nothing to get excited about. But many are commenting on the videos that followed.

[edit on 1-11-2009 by infidel666]

[edit on 1-11-2009 by infidel666]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:32 PM by alyosha1981
reply to post by seeashrink



Ok sarge, I can respect your opinion here as you have an emotional attachment to it, I compiled this thread as a resource and for that reason alone. You may be interested in another thread of mine Why all the police hatred? I like an objective look at both sides of an issue so plese keep that in mind and maybe stop by the other thread and take a look


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:36 PM by GovtFlu
Originally posted by paraclete1
Originally posted by GovtFlu
Originally posted by MegaCurious
reply to
post by alyosha1981



...As far as the video; those guys were just being guys who got flirted with by some hot tart.. I didn't see a victim, just consenting adults playing the game of life...


If the woman hadn't been intoxicated, then I might agree that there wasn't a victim. But according to the report she was and if that's the case, I feel she was a victim simply in the fact that the police shouldn't take advantage of anyone in that condition. There's a big difference in a woman throwing herself at a man and a man putting his hands on her and taking photos.

On the other hand, there are laws about public intoxication. If they'd arreste her for that, then this thread would have been about a passenger being arrested after her driver got arrested.

But in this situation, the bottom line is that the officers were wrong. And while one was fired, the other quit. So in my mind, I tend to believe that he knew what he did was wrong.

But still, being a man, I can't help wonder what the outcry would have been if an intoxicated man was fondled and photographed after throwing himself at an all woman department?


Well I'll have to ask your definition of "drunk", because legally public intoxication is usually something like Calif 647(f)PC "unable to care for your safety or the safety of others".. that girl looked like she was caring for her safety just fine to me.

In a recent thread / news story some regular pukes violated a drunk girl for hours while other regular pukes watched.. compare that to what these cops did.. see any massive difference? I do. the cops got caught flirting with a brief love tap or two and a cell phone quality photo, bfd.

As if every guy here would take moral offense to some hot tipsy chick putting on a display at their job...lol

BTW a cop quitting / resigning isn't an indication of guilt, one or both could be on probation where they do no enjoy police officers "rights".. like AB301 rights in Calif... or perhaps had previous incidents of being disciplined which is why they were on the desk. A probationer who resigns has a much better chance of getting another police job than if he were fired.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:36 PM by antonia
reply to post by Phenomium



I was wondering when the misogynists would just out themselves. Cry me a river.

Really, she made them do it? Come on. Do men have free will or do you just happen to be slaves to your impulses?


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:38 PM by Phenomium
Originally posted by paraclete1
reply to
post by seeashrink



Well said. The calibur of candidates does seem to be going down. The Local PD in my town was considering changing the test or lowering the score required because those taking it weren't able to meet standards. Thankfully they decided against it, but that was 5 to 7 years ago. I don't know if they've revisited it or not.

Thanks to the media and shows about dirty cops, the public no longer views the police officer as an outstanding citizen. But it like everything else in the world, you're going to find what you're looking for. If it happens to be bad cops. they'll be everywhere. The only expection to that rule seems to be a restroom. Never around when you need one. But wait, don't they also say that about cops, firemen, nurses, and Doctors. The truth is, they're there, you just are looking in the right places.


You cops should be ashamed of yourselves. You are to support your fellow officer. They were put into a precarious situation by a master of seduction who, by the very nature of the game, holds ALL of the cards and the deck is stacked against every man.That is the woman. Certainly YOU and Sargeant rat up there have had a "weak" moment where you have been taken advantage of by a female. It's impossible not to, even if you have never been on a date with one, they can get to you at every corner or even in the grocery store. The answer is NOT to condemn the men for having a weak moment. A reprimand or penalty of pay would have sufficed. Sargeant rat (in another post) didn't have to get the guy fired and starve his wife and children in the process. Certainly police are held to a higher standard but at the end of the day, they are still human beings who are subjected and are victims of the same emotions and feelings as you and I. You two are the reason why men everywhere are LOSING.


[edit on 1-11-2009 by Phenomium]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:50 PM by Phenomium
Originally posted by antonia
reply to
post by Phenomium



I was wondering when the misogynists would just out themselves. Cry me a river.

Really, she made them do it? Come on. Do men have free will or do you just happen to be slaves to your impulses?


You women KNOW that men are indeed slaves to their impulses and you capitalize on it every chance you get. No, SHE didn't make them leave their jobs, SHE went to the boss and highly suggested it and HE broke. All I know is that one of the women went upstairs to the bosses office and when she came back down, she had good news for several of the women and bad news for the men who were in their current positions. So no, SHE didn't do anything, but SHE had help. It's kind of like a sister who is favored by the parents over the brother......she doesn't have to do a thing, but she is hated for the undeserved favoritism..................she is also hated for what she is NOT doing, trying for "true equality". You won't get a man to cry you a river (as you suggested) that seems to be the way women are getting everything. The reason why it keeps on getting worse for us men is for that very fact....we don't cry to get what we want. We suffer silently while being beaten by a government who favors women over men and lays it on thick. I don't expect you or any other woman to agree with me and i fully expect you to scoff at every word I say. As mentioned before, you have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Nothing is wrong with your lives and indeed, the very threat of someone suggesting that there is an imbalance of equality in your favor.....is a very threat to your livilihood of government approved, government guaranteed privilage.

[edit on 1-11-2009 by Phenomium]



reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:58 PM by hoghead cheese
reply to post by PSUSA



Spot on, these cops showed that they where a danger to society and yet the judge decides to throw out the case essentially. Somebody should be investigating the judges. This is becoming a national crisis, the police are acting like a gang and are being protected like an organized crime syndicate.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 07:11 PM by Phenomium
Originally posted by antonia
Originally posted by Bored To Tears
reply to
post by HulaAnglers



Kind of over reacting to this aren't you?

They were just doing what any straight male would have done. Granted they did it at the worst possible place, but its not something to get your panties in a wad.


Don't presume to speak for all straight males. There are many who would be disgusted be her behavior and would not touch her. The officers were in the wrong because an obvious crime was being committed in front of them. If a man had done what she was doing it would have landed him in jail. They shouldn't have done any of that crap. There was an appropriate way to handle the situation and what you saw was not it.



........and how about you stop looking at the situation through rose colored glasses. I didn't hear you do anything but denigrate the cops here. Make no mistake about it, the female was just as in the wrong as the cops were. She played a big part, in fact, even instigated the scene. Had it not been for her incredibly short skirt and the "give me what I am wanting" attitude, this scenario most likely would not have occured. It was the fault of the female to foment this situation in the first place. BTW, if a MAN would have went to jail for doing what she had done.....then why is it not that she went to jail for that same offense? Because she's a female, that's why. Priviledged.

[edit on 1-11-2009 by Phenomium]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 07:21 PM by calstorm
reply to post by Phenomium



That's the most pathetic thing I have ever heard. And a bad stereotype of women to boot. So if you want a woman bad enough you just rape her because you can't control your self? Grow some balls. Fortunately for us women there are real men out there who don't give into the lame mind set.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 07:31 PM by Phenomium
Originally posted by calstorm
reply to
post by Phenomium



That's the most pathetic thing I have ever heard. And a bad stereotype of women to boot. So if you want a woman bad enough you just rape her because you can't control your self? Grow some balls. Fortunately for us women there are real men out there who don't give into the lame mind set.


First off, they didn't rape her. She did more than they did in the video. As for you being a "real woman" ....if you are the example for a real woman then who needs 'em? "Grow some balls?" that's the classiest thing I think I've heard yet from a woman. I never said anything about a man raping a woman to get what he wants. Typical, to twist the words of a man in your favor. I don't think any man, any where has ever had to deal with a woman trying to twist his words against him and had the woman create percieved, unspoken statements out of statements that were something entirely different. No, that has never happened to man LOL. What is pathetic is your attempt to twist a sentence and it's structure to benefit your argument of nothing. It's the equivalent of hitting below the belt....yeah, where those things are that I ostensibly just grew. A lucky guy is the man who gets a woman as classy as you. If you are a "real woman" who is worthy of a real man......how about showing some decorum.

[edit on 1-11-2009 by Phenomium]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 19 days ago with 277 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 3 days ago with 77 member flags