The article below is the answer to question 6 (Provide a complete and detailed account of the offense for which you seek pardon) on my presidential
pardon petition submitted last December to Bush’s justice department just before he left office. It was a parting shot.
For obvious reasons I don’t talk about “bloodlines” in it. I only talk about bloodlines here because this is the only place I know of that I can
get a receptive audience. Anywhere else I would simply be leaving my story open ridicule from people who do not want me to talk about it. I it here
also but I think some of that is just attempts to try and get me to tell more about my story. There are a few here that appear to want to shut me down
no matter what I have to say. I can already hear them attacking after reading this new post so I will preempt their attacks by answering for what may
appear to be weak points in the story now.
Yes, I was arrested for threatening to kill the heads of Enron’s online derivatives and energy trading unit and ex-senator Phil Gramm along with all
the heads of the United Bank of Switzerland (UBS). I did it to see if and when they would arrest me for it and whether they would send me to a
particular federal judge in Houston who helped set up the online trader just before being appointed to the bench.
I also set up a website had originally been designed to showcase a technique for creating art where I teach how see images in abstract patterns, then
trace over them, like when looking at clouds for things they might resemble, then taking a picture of it and tracing over what is see. It is a way for
someone with no artistic ability to create excellent works of art easily. By doing this often while spending a lot of time looking for images in
abstract patterns anywhere they are encountered, not only does it greatly enhance the ability to see high quality images to create art from but helps
develop the ability to do other kinds of art as well.
On top of that, things that are seen in abstract patterns are come in a dream type code that have meanings related to things in the seers life, much
like an ink blot test. In fact the ink blot test that first developed by Hermann Rorschach was inspired by his playing a Swiss game as a child called
Klecksography where kids made their own ink blots (en.wikipedia.org...
), then looked for images in them. Whoever came up
with the best representation of what they saw in the ink blot won the game.
My technique is along the same lines but instead of using uniform patterns, I look for images in abstract pattern anywhere they might be encountered.
Ink blots that are made by folding paper with wet ink on it in half and pressing ink on paper so the resulting patterns in equal on both sides of the
paper. I teach how to see images in any abstract pattern and how to get good enough at it to illicit what appears to be hallucinations that are of
photographic quality but can be clearly seen by the viewer to not be simply part of the abstract pattern they are looking at. At the same time these
images are being viewed, the seer is being communicated with by their inner mind about dream type topics. But since they are awake, the messages come
through with much more clarity.
The point is that I had built this website to educate. When it didn’t look I was going to get a chance to share it after I was ordered to get myself
arrested and draw this federal judge into an ambush, I found a way to use the site to achieve that objective. After some adjustments to the website to
delude its original message, I used it to stage my attacks from because it helped make it easy for me to appear to be insane. That was important
because I was not going to be able to draw out my quarry if I didn’t appear to be an exceptionally vulnerable personality that could easily be put
in a mental hospital without ever entering a federal courtroom.
I had to make the other team believe that I could be beaten simply by being arrested for the threats and then discarded in a federal mental hospital
without my being able to challenge them in court. If I could convince them I could be taken down easily, then I figured they would send me to that one
judge because he could be convinced that he wouldn’t have to get his hands dirty, just sign the motion to commit me.
I won’t ruin the rest of the story. I’m just making sure it’s clear that the mental hospital aspect of this story was planned. Bare in mind that
in the end, I was able to represent myself as my own attorney and strike my own deal with the prosecutor to which the judge agreed to after ruling I
was of sound mind able to represent my own interests in all aspects of my case competently. I also got my computers returned and an agreement written
into the plea bargain for the prosecutors office to investigate my claims about MTBE and it’s connection to Enron. This however never occurred as
the prosecutors office refused to live up to their end of the order, which is actually interesting because soon after I was set free, John Ashcroft
was replaced with Alberto Gonzales as head of the justice department. Gonzales was later exposed for putting pressure of federal prosecutors to do the
Bush administration’s bidding or be fired. Gonzales worked for the same law firm at the same time as the federal judge and both helped set up the
office at Enron that I was accused of attacking.
There is a lot details I didn’t add to this request for a presidential pardon. So feel free to ask question about the things that happened to me
when I was locked up. It was quite a circus and gives a great deal of incite into how our federal justice system actually works, or more accurately,
Federal court case number - H-03-162 - United States government -v- Bobby Fontaine
Answer to question 6 -
I got myself arrested purposely. My life was threatened by a US senator for blocking the discreet and easy passage of a liability waiver amendment for
MTBE producers, a gasoline additive, in an energy bill in 2002. I’d been watching the debate over the amendment on C-SPAN from my home in Virginia
just outside Washington DC. Whenever a senator got up and spoke about what they were doing, I emailed his home town newspaper what he said and what
was wrong with it, as well as to any email addresses I could find from his home town.
MTBE pollutes groundwater nationwide. It also causes high emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s) that cause climate change. This is not the
same global warming said to be caused by CO2 but a change in weather patterns that happen as emissions are released into the atmosphere where they are
released. This proven climate science has been around since the global warming debate began but is not publically favored in Washington or Europe. But
it’s slowly becoming the main focus of climate science where CO2 theories are becoming less relevant.
I write extensively on this issue under the name Bobby Fontaine and Clyde Novitz and am fluent in understanding it. I have an email from the top
climatologist in the US, professor Drew Shindell, where he writes that CO2 is irrelevant to a true climate change debate, that VOC’s, low level
ozone, methane, and their reactions with the suns rays and atmospheric water vapor are what is causing regional shifts in weather patterns. Since
these manmade pollutants are also part of a natural process for how our regional atmospheres function, any significant addition we make to what
nature produces causes dramatic changes to the area the pollutants were released and wherever they might drift to.
Since the human race emits these pollutants all over the world, weather patterns appear to be changing on a global scale lending support to the CO2
theory. But in reality, weather pattern are changing regionally on a global scale. So shifts to ending emissions of pollutants in one place will allow
for normal weather patterns to return to that region while seeming global warming changes are still happening elsewhere that are still polluting. This
is relevant to my offer to allow you to pardon me because at the time I was threatened, MTBE was causing sever changes in climate around the US while
the liability waiver I was blocking from being passed put the burden of lawsuits against the oil companies for anything MTBE had done on the US
government and taxpayer instead of the MTBE industry.
It was debated as if it was designed to protect the oil industry from polluted groundwater lawsuits from leaking underground storage tanks but was
worded so that the government claimed fault for anything it had done, which included damage caused by extreme changes in climate. The debate was being
conducted in such a way that the American people, including the news media who were not fluent enough in understanding the science or politics
surrounding the MTBE issue, would not know that there was a serious error being committed by their leaders against them. My sending emails informing
their constituents about what they were doing undermined the element of secrecy they needed to pass the bill. The debate ended with my being
threatened in such a ludicrous way that only I and my senator knew that it was directed at me while I would have looked delusional at best if I tried
to get anyone to listen to my accusations. I suppose if I had acted in haste to defend myself, I would have discredited myself as a voice to be
reckoned with on the issue of MTBE, perhaps even getting myself into a great deal of trouble.
A few months later when they tried to debate the bill again, I did the same thing by informing their constituents about what they were doing ignoring
the previous threats. The debate over the liability waiver was shut down again, only this time quickly and quietly with no threats which worried me. I
had been too easily successful. It made me think they had a backup plan. I was like they were just testing the waters to see if they had scared me
off. When they saw clearly I hadn’t taken their threats seriously, they seemed to simply have moved on to try their hand at another solution. This
made me worry they might follow through on their threat. It bothered me greatly causing me loss of sleep and frustration until it dawned on me what
they were going to do.
This was in the fall of 2002, when Scott McClellan, former White House press secretary to president Bush, says he knew then that Bush was going to
invade Iraq no matter what anyone else thought, that his diplomatic stance was only a ploy. That’s the same time it struck me that the liability
waver would be tabled in congress for a third time as the war began where it would be run through the House and Senate to be put on the Presidents
desk as the war starting so the news media would be distracted from everything else.
This only occurred to me because I knew that the Clean Air Act of 1990, which secured mandates for MTBE to be added to gasoline in the first place,
was only able to be passed in spite of the many shortcomings of MTBE because the first Bush president had allowed Saddam Hussein to invade Kuwait and
was getting ready push him back across the border into his own country at the time the oxygenate (MTBE is an oxygenate) requirement was debated.
I followed the Clean Air Act debate in 1990 and was astonished that the MTBE mandate was supported by nearly a hundred percent vote in both the House
and Senate. It was known to be going to pollute most of the groundwater in the US while there were other choices that were better. In fact the
scientific community objected to oxygenates altogether based on concerns for how its emission would react with smog and climate along with how it
would pollute groundwater. At that time, I read two newspapers everyday, The Washington Post and The Washington Times. The Washington Times isn’t
owned by corporate investors but by the Unification Church founder Sun Myung Moon. The Washington Post did not cover the MTBE aspect of the Clean Air
Act debate just like the rest of the publically owned major metropolitan news sources.
But the Washington Times covered the MTBE story in such detail that I have yet to find any other articles to date that were so thorough in telling the
truth about MTBE. Those articles disappeared from The Washington Times archives after the same senator who threatened me allowed Sun Myung Moon to use
the Dirksen Senate Office Building to for a ceremony where he claimed "Emperors, kings and presidents . . . have declared to all Heaven and Earth
that Reverend Sun Myung Moon is none other than humanity's Savior, Messiah, Returning Lord and True Parent" on March 23, 2004, while I was in a
federal detention canter in Houston. No other major news source covered the MTBE aspect of the Clean Air Act of 1990 to any significant degree.
The Washington Times however reported that MTBE was designed to produce emissions that would mix with smog dissolving it making it rise into the sky
to bake in the sun where it became inert and later dumped in the Atlantic Ocean after following the jet stream there. MTBE did get rid of smog. Smog
back then was largely comprised of nitrogen oxide from coal burning and diesel engine emissions. Gasoline engines were not the cause of smog yet the
EPA proudly claims that MTBE got rid of it in metropolitan regions nationwide. But they won’t admit how this is possible when the obvious question
arises as to how cars got rid of pollution they did not produce it.
In fact MTBE is said to have decreased low level ozone when admittedly it causes higher levels of VOC’s, a necessary precursor to low level ozone
forming. When VOC’s are mixed with nitrogen oxide smog in the suns ultra violet rays, it causes low level ozone to form. And if VOC’s are emitted
in high enough ratios, ozone and smog are forced to rise high enough into atmosphere to give the impression that the air has been cleared. Low level
ozone is also less visible than nitrogen oxide smog. Although MTBE emissions of isobutylene (ether), methanol, and formaldehyde, along with its
contribution to low level ozone formation, far exceed the dangers to the environment and human health than those associated with nitrogen oxide smog,
since the resulting pollutants are less visible to the naked eye than the previous smog, the EPA says the air we breath is cleaner.
This was the preferred way to take our pollution control policies in the Clean Air Act of 1990 by the oil companies who didn’t want to use an
additive to gasoline called, polyisobutylene (PIB). It was offered as a solution to mileage and pollution problems caused by gasoline and diesel
engines prior to the Clean Air Act. It was reported by The Washington Times to reduce pollutants from diesel fuel and gasoline by 70% while giving 20%
more mileage. It’s being used now by Texas in their state diesel supplies under the product name Viscon to help bring them into compliance with EPA
air quality standards. But the mileage benefit aspects of its use are not being published by the state of Texas with regards to their certification of
The company that makes this additive has always shied away from promoting the benefits PIB offers fossil fuels because it’s refined from crude oil
where fuels can actually be refined to have the same properties PIB gives it. In fact PIB is made from chemical compounds that are taken out of crude
oil for use as polymers rather than simply left in to be refined into fossil fuels. So if there’s government mandate for it to be used in gasoline,
refiners would simply come up with a patented process to produce fuel refined to the same standards that adding PIB gives it. Since it has to be added
to gasoline in such small and particular amounts or it doesn’t work, his additive would have to be outlawed because any use of it would cause the
fuel they produce to fail to have the benefits PIB is designed to give it.
The state of Texas has even hired Viscon to work with refiners to come up with a way to refine fuel with these properties. So Viscon will now one day
have the patent on the process for this higher quality fuel so we might even see a cure for our domestic fuel problems come to light in the not too
distant future as this additive could give the world 20 more mileage with 70 percent less pollution problems coming from fossil fuels. It’s just a
matter of how long it takes for this secretive process to evolve to fruition or for the right people to find out about it and force it to happen
sooner, like the American people.
MTBE decreases mileage and causes far greater pollution. But the polluters responsible for the smog problem of 1999 didn’t want to clean up their
industries. So Ken Lay of Enron, Phil Gramm and his wife Wendy, and George Bush 41 used money and subtle political promises they reneged on later to
get congress to mandate MTBE be added to gasoline believing it was good for the environment even though they knew otherwise. When the scientific
community refused to go along with the ruse, George Bush promised to have MTBE evaluated by the EPA. He promised if their concerns were valid, he
would support PIB in MTBE’s place. They agreed with his proposal thinking it would insure PIB’s use because they knew a thorough study of MTBE
would show it was poison for the environment and human health, and lead to extreme changes in climate.
With the scientific community’s blessing, the Clean Air Act of 1990 was unanimously passed under the cover of Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait
followed by George Bush’s mounted effort to drive him back into Iraq. No study of MTBE over the concerns of scientists was ever done. In fact Bush
and senator Gramm went right to work on securing a trillion dollar loan to build MTBE refineries. Once that was done, there was no stopping the MTBE
mandate from being exercised. Since a trillion dollars wasn’t actually needed to build enough refining capacity to produce MTBE to comply with the
EPA’s mandate, it was put to work on Wall Street funding the investment bubble that falsely gave the impression that our economy was booming when it
was actually suffering, which incidentally burst in May of 2006 when MTBE use was discontinued in favor of anhydrous ethanol, another smog melting
climate changing oxygenate additive.
The problem was not the trillion dollar loan that was due from the beginning to be paid off in May of 2006. And the Russian are darn glad we came
along needing that money because it was originally stolen from the Soviet Union’s treasury at the end of the cold war and was virtually worthless.
But it was never planned on being used to build refineries but flushed through Wall Street building an elite banking system on top of it to lend the
money out over and over using our credits markets as the foundation for the biggest ponzi scheme in the history of free market financing. In fact the
reason the world’s economy is failing now is because our original investment markets were built on a flimsy foundation needing cheap fuel to provide
the luxury of easy profits.
Ethanol is expensive to produce, a huge drain on the economy. It also causes a huge loss of mileage in most vehicles, more than the amount of 10
percent added to gasoline. MTBE is cheap to produce and opened a market for huge natural gas reserves we didn’t have a market for so it was also
good for the economy in spite of its pitfalls. Anhydrous ethanol is made from corn. We are using it now having replaced MTBE with it. The state of
California took the EPA to court in 2006 proving that oxygenates worsen air quality in order to forego adding ethanol to their gasoline. They won
their argument based on the scientific evidence they provided for the court but the Bush administration stepped in saying it was no longer being
required for air quality but to lessen dependence on foreign oil.
The problem with that argument is that anhydrous ethanol is an oxygenate. Oxygenates were designed purposely to cost gasoline mileage in order to get
the high VOC emissions that mix with nitrogen oxide smog causing it to float up into the sky like a hot air balloon. So there’s no way it can be
considered a fuel product to replace gasoline with because it causes the need for more oil imports to make up for the loss of mileage and to produce
from growing and harvesting of corn, fertilizing it, and then refining it into anhydrous ethanol. It also has to be trucked or trained to fuel depots
because it cannot be transferred through pipelines because it is so corrosive.
Hydrous ethanol however, which is what anhydrous ethanol is produced from, is safe for pipelines, doesn’t cause emissions problems or losses of
mileage, and can be added to gasoline safely at higher ratios than 10 percent. It’s also cheap to produce because the last steps in producing
anhydrous ethanol from hydrous ethanol are very energy intensive while it also removes the water content from the ethanol which means less fuel. The
excuse by the industry seems to be their belief that hydrous ethanol cannot be added to gasoline but new technologies proves this to be false and is
being done in Germany, China, and even tested by the state of Louisiana.
I have an article that report how General Motors began working on plans to sell flex fuel vehicles in Brazil by 2007 that run on hydrous ethanol
blends of gasoline and another article that says Brazil has been doing this on a national scale prior to 2004. I also have articles from 2008 that
suggest the ability to add hydrous ethanol to gasoline is a recent discovery that is still being developed when Brazil appears to have been doing it
for many years with our auto makers helping them. In fact Brazil and the US signed an energy pact in 2007 vowing to share ethanol technology but in
2008, it’s being said that hydrous ethanol has just been discovered to be able to be added to gasoline to make it actually work towards a fuel
benefit over what happens when using anhydrous ethanol.
Hydrous ethanol is easy to produce. It can be used in place of gasoline altogether in engines designed or modified for it. Anhydrous ethanol requires
complex science and regulatory oversight and is expensive and dangerous to produce and handle thus requiring
large corporate investments and governmental oversight to support a market for it. Hydrous ethanol can be made in the kitchen of the average home on a
small scale or in the backyard on a larger. Henry Ford produced the first Model T Fords to run on gasoline or hydrous ethanol because there weren’t
enough filling stations to service the fleet of cars he put on the market. It seems the oil companies hadn’t anticipated that a car that was
affordable for the average citizen to but would be coming out until many years later. So they had only planned on building enough fuelling stations to
provide for a wealthy clientele.
Henry Ford’s original vision for supplying the nations future fuel needs included hydrous ethanol produced on a wide scale from hemp, which grows
prolifically on land not suitable for agriculture and thrives in dry soil so as not to strain water supplies. His plan was to create jobs and made us
independent of foreign oil imports in a way that didn’t compete with food crops. But the oil companies didn’t like this direction so prohibition
put an end to being able to home brew ethanol for fuel. Later the outlawing of hemp because Mexican agricultural workers liked smoking it created an
environment that gave a monopoly to the oil companies to control our future fuel needs.
Rudolf Diesel designed his first diesel engines with the same kind of fuel source in mind. Diesel fuel can be made from hemp seeds. So just like
gasoline and diesel are produced from the same barrel of crude oil, hydrous ethanol and diesel fuel can be produced from the same hemp plant with
simple technologies that anyone can provide for themselves at a most affordable cost and reasonable effort. Once the oil companies had the
infrastructure in place to support selling gasoline cheaper than ethanol could be produced, prohibition was repealed. This pattern was followed in
many other countries who came close to finding out how to run a biofuel efficient economy before the oil companies had a chance to make them dependent
on foreign oil.
This is relevant to my case because it shows an ongoing conspiracy I was caught in the middle of dating back for many decades in which our fuel needs
are manipulated to suit the greed of a hand full of wealthy energy dictators who will stop at nothing to have their way with our American financial
structure. So my sending threatening emails to give the government a way to remove me as a threat to the MTBE liability waiver being passed under the
cover of the Iraq war was a crime committed out of necessity under great duress.
Take for instance how tetraethyl lead (TEL) was added to gasoline in the 1920’s. Just as with MTBE, the scientific community weighed in on the
notion of whether it would prevent engine knocking without hurting the environment or public health. So the government had Dupont, the chemical
company that produced it, and the oil companies investigate their concerns. Of course they came back saying it wasn’t a problem but the truth was it
made the researches testing it extremely sick even causing convulsions and hallucinations where they had to be removed from their labs in straight
jackets. Closer scrutiny showed it caused neurological problems in even small quantities.
After 30 years, soil samples wherever it was used found it at high levels leading to new concerns. It turned to be in plants and agricultural products
grown in soil polluted with it while breathing it was exposed Americans to many short and long term health consequences. But it was still 30 more
years before it was removed from the market only to be replaced with MTBE and now ethanol.
Look at asbestos lawsuits brought against Halliburton as the result of Dick Cheney acquiring an oil and gas drilling company named Dresser Industries
in 1998. A couple years later when he was serving as Vice president, in December of 2001, asbestos lawsuits directed at old contracts fulfilled by
Dresser Industries before it was part of Halliburton came against Halliburton because it had become the parent company of Dresser. Halliburton settle
for a little over 4 billion dollars. This came a few months after Enron collapsed, which came just after the September 11 attacks that begun the war
President George Bush’s father was an integral part of getting MTBE added to gasoline. Enron played a central role in the logistics of getting MTBE
to the market place and servicing the trillion dollar loan taken out to build refineries to produce it. George H. W. Bush worked for Dresser 1948-1951
before he founded Zapata Corporation. His father, Prescott Bush had been a W. A. Harriman and Company executive who had been involved in the
conversion of Dresser to a public company. He served on the board of directors for twenty-two years.
Halliburton is a big brother corporation to all these companies. Halliburton was awarded no-bid contracts as the sole provider of supporting services
for the US invasion and occupation of Iraq while also winning contracts to manage Iraqi oil infrastructure. Halliburton bought Dresser/Kellogg for
7.7 billion dollars. Then they had to fork over 4 billion more dollars to settle asbestos lawsuits at the same time it allowed Dresser to go its own
way while keeping its Kellogg Division that held an patent for new oil drilling technology Halliburton wanted.
The asbestos lawsuit cost Halliburton a huge loss in stock value which was later boost back to its overvalued position when it picked up the contracts
to support US efforts in Iraq. Dick Cheney played a role in helping them acquire the contracts in what many believe was illegal manipulations of the
bidding process. Then and only then was the asbestos lawsuit finally settled, after tax payer moneys had paid Halliburton through its newly acquired
Kellogg division that was selling gasoline to the US army at exorbitant prices enough money to pay for the Dresser asbestos problem and the cost of
acquiring Dresser and Kellogg.
What I’m saying is that their was a quid pro quo arrangement between Bush, Enron, Cheney, Dresser/Kellogg, and Halliburton that was agreed upon
before the presidential election of 2000 was completed. It included helping Enron with its MTBE problems and Halliburton/Dresser with their asbestos
problem. I however interrupted the process with my campaign to expose the truth about MTBE’s effects on weather patterns which lead to the war on
terror and Iraq war being used as cover to try to fix what was becoming a whirlpool of a scandal and conspiracy that sucked all the players involved,
including me, into a bottomless pit of deceit and denial. This is the story of how I worked it out using the justice system as my instrument to
provoke truth from the process.
In 1998, I drank well water polluted with MTBE. It had been making me sick breathing it for a few years before that where I live where there’s heavy
traffic here 24 hours a day. But I didn’t know what was making me ill. Drinking the well water was the last straw my body could take after so many
years of being pulverized with breathing MTBE exhaust fumes. I suffered a chemical induced amnesia as a result of drinking the well water where I
didn’t even have the sense to know I was sick.
When I began to recover and remember the details of my life, I began having new bouts of the same illness, which included a wide range of other
symptoms. Eventually I realized that breathing it in exhaust fumes was causing me these new troubles. So I had to wear a charcoal filter respirator
most of the time, sometimes even inside my home when on days when the weather was mild, it caused the MTBE gas to build up in the low lying area where
[edit on 19 Oct 09 by Gools]