5) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald had an ID that said Hidell, an alias that linked him with buying the gun.
4 days till november
Just after the arrest of Oswald, Dallas law enforcement officials announced that they had found the murder weapon. Wade and his associates studied the rifle it was shown on television repeatedly as some enforcement official carried it high in the air, with his bare hands on the rifle. After hours of examination Wade said without hesitation that “the murder weapon was a German Mauser.”
What a sad, sad, sad day. A man holds the gun without any gloves, so technically the palm print now could be anyones. Not to mention that this weapon, that was stated as a German Mauser! Was not a german mauser?
4 Days Till November
The next day it was reported that FBI files showed that Oswald purchased an Italian carbine through the mail. It was sent to a post-office box maintained by Oswald in his own name and also A. Hidell (Clearly no serious effort to escape detection as the purchaser of the rifle was made by Oswald, if he did purchase it.).edu
Armed with the knowledge that Oswald could be connected with an Italian carbine (it then not being known that the Italian rifle in question might not be able to fire three times in five seconds), Wade made a new announcement. The murder weapon was not a German Mauser, it was an Italian carbine. This prosecution reversal established a high point in vulnerability for the trial—the trial that was never to take place.
Not to mention that Hidell, Oswalds "supposed" alias, was NEVER used by Oswald. Oswald went by the alias of Lee. Oswald was arrested by the Dallas police and the DAY AFTER his arrest the FBI stated that they found a package (the rifle) ordered by Oswald, under an assumed name of Hidell. The Dallas police quickly stated on television that they found an ID on Oswald the day before that stated Hidell.
Is it me or is that an IMPORTANT PIECE of evidence to with hold from the FBI! Something is seriously wrong here.
6) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald is said to have been "running" from the depository. Or was he?

Alright? And why would you try to arrest an employee? Why Oswald? Why not someone else? If the Employer said that it was alright he is a worker, why would the officer not arrest him. What was the officers motive of arrest? And why would he stop the arrest when he learned Oswald was a worker? Makes NO SENSE!!
Unexplained by Wade is why the officer was going to arrest Oswald, who was sipping a soft drink in the lunchroom along with others. If the officer had reason to single out Oswald for arrest for the assassination at that time, it seems unlikely that the mere statement that Oswald was an employe might result in immunity from arrest..edu
Wade does explain, however, how the almost immediate description of Oswald was radioed to the police and to the citizens of Dallas. The explanation: “Every other employe was located but this defendant of the company.” The New York Times (Nov. 23) reported: “About 90 persons were employed in the Texas School Book Depository and most of them were out watching the President’s motorcade when the shots were fired.” Police Chief Curry, who was riding in a car just 40 feet ahead of the limousine carrying the President, said he could tell from the sound of the three shots that they had come from the book company’s building. Moments after the shots were fired, Curry said, he radioed instructions that the building be surrounded and searched (New York Times, Nov. 24). The deployment of 500 officers from his 1,100-man force made fast action possible in the manhunt, he said.
The scene painted for us by Wade and Curry finds officers immediately rushing to the building to seal it off and search it. This is the building from which the fatal shots allegedly were fired. In these circumstances, is it likely that Oswald was permitted to leave the premises after the police had arrived? Is it likely that Oswald, after killing the President, and deciding to leave the premises, decided first to stop off for a soda, and had then—only after the building was surrounded, sealed off, and the search begun—made an effort to leave? Is it likely that each of the almost 90 employes, most of whom were outside of the building, engulfed in the panic and confusion attendant upon the assassination, could easily and quickly return to his place of employment through the police line, while still on his lunch hour, so that “every other employe was located but this defendant…” and the description of the one missing employe radioed at once?
Again, a huge PROBLEM!
7) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald, while taking a bus from the scene, told a woman passenger that the President had been shot and began to laugh afterwards.
So he was proud of what he had done? Awesome! But this type of Pride does NOT lead to three days of PURE DENIAL! It does not make sense, even BTK (Bind-Toture-Kill Murder) had to confess, he had to tell someone. Oswald given the oppurtunity because of his pride, would have confessed and laughed in all of our faces if he did it. According to the FBI, they do not credit or hold credence to this event.
8) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald shot and killed a police officer
Say what? Check this out:
WADE SAID, “He walked up to the car. Officer Tippit stepped out of the car and started around it. He shot him three times and killed him.”.edu
This allegation isn’t directly related to the murder of the President but it raised interesting points. The Dallas authorities first said Tippit was shot in a movie theater. Later, it was reported that he was shot on one street and, still later, on another street. The first charge against Oswald was not for the murder of the President but for the murder of Tippit. That charge was made while the investigation of the Kennedy shooting was still going on., Wade announced that the Tippit case was absolutely set and that all the evidence proved Oswald shot the officer. In view of the certainty of the prosecutor as to a case that had been entirely locked up two days before, the following dialogue (at the press conference) is rather curious.
Reporter: Was this (where Oswald shot Tippit) in front of the boarding house?
Wade: No, it’s not in front of the boarding house.
Reporter: Where was it?
Wade: I don't have it exact.
The above explains it perfectly.
9) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: And possibily the most "damning" evidence is the map that was found of where Kennedy would be when he was going to take the shot.
A document written by the defendant showing his intention to commit a crime is important evidence. It seems incredible, were such a map in the hands of the Dallas authorities on the previous day when Wade presented the evidence, “piece by piece,” that he would have neglected to mention it..edu
Oswald was arrested three days prior to the map announcement. On the day of his arrest police removed all of his belongings from his room, telling the landlady that Oswald “would not return.” One wonders where the map came from three days later. The same newspapers that hailed the discovery of the map Nov. 25, without a single question as to its legitimacy, origin. or previous whereabouts, totally ignored or buried the last comment regarding this important document. “Dallas officials yesterday denied that such a map exists.” (Washington Post, Nov. 27.)
Is it me or is this "finding" of evidence disturbing? Where is it coming from? And why were they holding it from the FBI? if it doesn't make sense, something is VERY WRONG. And something is wrong here.
Continued Next Post.
[edit on Aug 30th 2009 by TheMythLives]



Oswald was the assassin and the ONLY assassin that day. Of course this is
according to the Warren Commission. However, their are a few things that do not add up, but before we sort through that, the facts are as follows
(according to the Warren Commission): 






The day that JFK died, changed everything in the world and especially here
in America. Would the world have changed if he was still alive? Who knows, but his legacy and his dream still lives on. He is among one of the most
popular presidents of all time. His speeches are and were not rivaled by many, however, one bullt changed that. The shot to the head. Yet who killed
Kennedy, why, how, and so many other questions. I will attempt to answer them as easily and as readable as possible. 








