It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


John F. Kennedy: The Case Reviewed

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

+45 more 
posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 05:04 PM
Hello ladies and Gentlemen! Welcome back for another Case Review Series. In this series we will be delving deep into the Kennedy-King Conspiracy (JFK, RFK, and MLK) . Was there more than on shooter on the grassy knoll? Did RFK die by the hands of an Arab Extremist? Did LBJ have both Kennedy's killed? Did George Bush Snr. help in anyway? Was MLK assassinated by the government? Was the 60's the year of the great "clean" up? Let’s investigate and let’s see what the evidence leads for in:

John F. Kennedy: The Case Reviewed

Photograph provide by:Wiki

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

~John F. Kennedy- The Newspaper

Friday on November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas at 12:30 PM CST, America, as well as the world changed forever. President Kennedy was shot and Governer Connely was also wounded. The motorcade sped off to the nearest hospital, Parkland Hospital, where a tracheostomy and other efforts failed to keep him alive. President Kennedy was Pronounced dead at 1:00 P.M.

Marine and defector to the Soviet Union, was arrested around 2:00 PM, at the Texas Theatre in the Oak Cliff suburb of Dallas. Lee Harvey Oswald, was arrested for the murder of Officer Tippit, NOT for the assassination of JFK. Hence the famous video of Oswald stating that he doesn't know what he is being charged with and the first time he was told that he was being charged with assassinating the President. During the LIVE tv transfer of Oswald to the county facilities on Sunday morning the 24th, Oswald was shot and killed in the basement of the Dallas Police station. His murderer was a local nightclub owner with connections to organized crime named Jack Ruby.

Jack Ruby was later arrested and stated that he shot him for Jaqueline Kennedy. However, the conspiracy from here grows. Jack Ruby would later be filmed stating a very serious accusation, but we will get to that video later. Lets start with the supposed "facts", than the Crime Scene, and finally my theory and closing statements.

The "Facts"

Oswald was the assassin and the ONLY assassin that day. Of course this is according to the Warren Commission. However, their are a few things that do not add up, but before we sort through that, the facts are as follows (according to the Warren Commission):

1) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: That a number of witnesses saw Oswald in the School Book depository at the moment of the assassination.

2) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: A palm print was on the rifle, that belonged to the Oswald (The rifle and the palm print)

3) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald’s palm print was located and identified on a cardboard box on the 6th floor, next to the window where he supposedly shot from.

4) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Paraffin tests (gun powder on hands) on both hands showed that Oswald had fired a gun recently, but we will investigate this Paraffin test further below.

5) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald had an ID that said Hidell, an alias that linked him with buying the gun.

6) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald is said to have been "running" from the depository. Or was he?

7) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald, while taking a bus from the scene, told a woman passenger that the President had been shot and began to laugh afterwards.

8) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald shot and killed a police officer

9) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: And possibily the most "damning" evidence is the map that was found of where Kennedy would be when he was going to take the shot.

The Facts or the Most important areas of Oswalds Guilt, must be investigated further.

Examining Oswalds Guilt

1) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: That a number of witnesses saw Oswald in the School Book depository at the moment of the assassination.

According to, Wade:

“First, there was a number of witnesses that saw the person with the gun on the sixth floor of the bookstore building, in the window—detailing the window—where he was looking out.”

The following info is taken from a witness in Newsweek. (Newsweek—Dec. 9)

“I can’t identify him, but if I see a man who looks like him, I’ll point him out.”

2) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: A palm print was on the rifle, that belonged to the Oswald (The rifle and the palm print)

What a shame, because the FBI did NOT find a palm print! However, after Oswald was killed by Ruby a re-examination of the rifle produced a print. Strange right? BUT according the official FBI statement:

PDF File- The Warren Commission

So how did a Palm print that was reported by a credible newpaper to not be their all of a sudden appear out of thin air. Was this a mistake? If it was it was a BIG mistake. or was it a cover-up? After Oswald was dead they could have placed the gun in his hand and made the Palm print appear.

3) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald’s palm print was located and identified on a cardboard box on the 6th floor, next to the window where he supposedly shot from.

Thats interesting. Just one box had his print and no protection.

The presence of a palm print indicates that he wore no gloves and took no precautions to prevent a trail of fingerprints and palm prints. Nevertheless, no prints of the defendant were found on the floors, walls, window ledge, window frame or window. Only a movable cardboard carton, subsequently present at the police station while the defendant was also there, is now alleged to have his print.

4) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Paraffin tests (gun powder on hands) on both hands showed that Oswald had fired a gun recently, but we will investigate this Paraffin test further below.

Yes the UNBREAKABLE paraffin tests or is it? According to a new study:

SC finds limited value in paraffin tests as evidence

As part of the experiment, he said, 17 men were made to fire five shots of a .38 cal. revolver using one hand only. After each string, both hands were subjected to paraffin testing.

Eight of the test subjects showed negative or essentially negative results on both hands. This means that, at least for the experiment, paraffin tests did not work half the time.

Three men showed positive results on the idle hand, but were negative on the firing hand. Four men tested positive on both hands, after having fired only with their right hand. Even if they do work, paraffin tests can sometimes give the wrong results. In the Philippines, paraffin testing has faced much scrutiny as well.

The conclusiveness or inconclusiveness of its results was discussed in the Supreme Court’s Oct. 6, 1995 decision convicting Claudio Teehankee Jr. for the 1991 murder of Maureen Hultman, the killing of Roland John Chapman and the frustrated murder of Jussi Olavi Leino.

During trial at the lower court, and during his appeal at the Court of Appeals, Teehankee capitalized on how he tested negative in the paraffin tests administered when he was taken into custody.

“Scientific experts concur in the view that the paraffin test has proved extremely unreliable in use. The only thing that it can definitely establish is the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites on the hand. It cannot be established from this test alone that the source of the nitrates or nitrites was the discharge of a firearm,” the High Court ruled.
August 19, 2009

Say what? So faulty tests and unreliability. Very interesting indeed, I think we can consider this part of the guilt, not so conclusive or damning.

Continued Next Post:

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 05:04 PM

5) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald had an ID that said Hidell, an alias that linked him with buying the gun.

4 days till november

Just after the arrest of Oswald, Dallas law enforcement officials announced that they had found the murder weapon. Wade and his associates studied the rifle it was shown on television repeatedly as some enforcement official carried it high in the air, with his bare hands on the rifle. After hours of examination Wade said without hesitation that “the murder weapon was a German Mauser.”

What a sad, sad, sad day. A man holds the gun without any gloves, so technically the palm print now could be anyones. Not to mention that this weapon, that was stated as a German Mauser! Was not a german mauser?

4 Days Till November

The next day it was reported that FBI files showed that Oswald purchased an Italian carbine through the mail. It was sent to a post-office box maintained by Oswald in his own name and also A. Hidell (Clearly no serious effort to escape detection as the purchaser of the rifle was made by Oswald, if he did purchase it.)

Armed with the knowledge that Oswald could be connected with an Italian carbine (it then not being known that the Italian rifle in question might not be able to fire three times in five seconds), Wade made a new announcement. The murder weapon was not a German Mauser, it was an Italian carbine. This prosecution reversal established a high point in vulnerability for the trial—the trial that was never to take place.

Not to mention that Hidell, Oswalds "supposed" alias, was NEVER used by Oswald. Oswald went by the alias of Lee. Oswald was arrested by the Dallas police and the DAY AFTER his arrest the FBI stated that they found a package (the rifle) ordered by Oswald, under an assumed name of Hidell. The Dallas police quickly stated on television that they found an ID on Oswald the day before that stated Hidell.

Is it me or is that an IMPORTANT PIECE of evidence to with hold from the FBI! Something is seriously wrong here.

6) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald is said to have been "running" from the depository. Or was he?

Alright? And why would you try to arrest an employee? Why Oswald? Why not someone else? If the Employer said that it was alright he is a worker, why would the officer not arrest him. What was the officers motive of arrest? And why would he stop the arrest when he learned Oswald was a worker? Makes NO SENSE!!

Unexplained by Wade is why the officer was going to arrest Oswald, who was sipping a soft drink in the lunchroom along with others. If the officer had reason to single out Oswald for arrest for the assassination at that time, it seems unlikely that the mere statement that Oswald was an employe might result in immunity from arrest.

Wade does explain, however, how the almost immediate description of Oswald was radioed to the police and to the citizens of Dallas. The explanation: “Every other employe was located but this defendant of the company.” The New York Times (Nov. 23) reported: “About 90 persons were employed in the Texas School Book Depository and most of them were out watching the President’s motorcade when the shots were fired.” Police Chief Curry, who was riding in a car just 40 feet ahead of the limousine carrying the President, said he could tell from the sound of the three shots that they had come from the book company’s building. Moments after the shots were fired, Curry said, he radioed instructions that the building be surrounded and searched (New York Times, Nov. 24). The deployment of 500 officers from his 1,100-man force made fast action possible in the manhunt, he said.

The scene painted for us by Wade and Curry finds officers immediately rushing to the building to seal it off and search it. This is the building from which the fatal shots allegedly were fired. In these circumstances, is it likely that Oswald was permitted to leave the premises after the police had arrived? Is it likely that Oswald, after killing the President, and deciding to leave the premises, decided first to stop off for a soda, and had then—only after the building was surrounded, sealed off, and the search begun—made an effort to leave? Is it likely that each of the almost 90 employes, most of whom were outside of the building, engulfed in the panic and confusion attendant upon the assassination, could easily and quickly return to his place of employment through the police line, while still on his lunch hour, so that “every other employe was located but this defendant…” and the description of the one missing employe radioed at once?

Again, a huge PROBLEM!

7) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald, while taking a bus from the scene, told a woman passenger that the President had been shot and began to laugh afterwards.

So he was proud of what he had done? Awesome! But this type of Pride does NOT lead to three days of PURE DENIAL! It does not make sense, even BTK (Bind-Toture-Kill Murder) had to confess, he had to tell someone. Oswald given the oppurtunity because of his pride, would have confessed and laughed in all of our faces if he did it. According to the FBI, they do not credit or hold credence to this event.

8) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: Oswald shot and killed a police officer

Say what? Check this out:

WADE SAID, “He walked up to the car. Officer Tippit stepped out of the car and started around it. He shot him three times and killed him.”

This allegation isn’t directly related to the murder of the President but it raised interesting points. The Dallas authorities first said Tippit was shot in a movie theater. Later, it was reported that he was shot on one street and, still later, on another street. The first charge against Oswald was not for the murder of the President but for the murder of Tippit. That charge was made while the investigation of the Kennedy shooting was still going on., Wade announced that the Tippit case was absolutely set and that all the evidence proved Oswald shot the officer. In view of the certainty of the prosecutor as to a case that had been entirely locked up two days before, the following dialogue (at the press conference) is rather curious.

Reporter: Was this (where Oswald shot Tippit) in front of the boarding house?
Wade: No, it’s not in front of the boarding house.
Reporter: Where was it?
Wade: I don't have it exact.

The above explains it perfectly.

9) Dallas district attorney henry wade stated: And possibily the most "damning" evidence is the map that was found of where Kennedy would be when he was going to take the shot.

A document written by the defendant showing his intention to commit a crime is important evidence. It seems incredible, were such a map in the hands of the Dallas authorities on the previous day when Wade presented the evidence, “piece by piece,” that he would have neglected to mention it.

Oswald was arrested three days prior to the map announcement. On the day of his arrest police removed all of his belongings from his room, telling the landlady that Oswald “would not return.” One wonders where the map came from three days later. The same newspapers that hailed the discovery of the map Nov. 25, without a single question as to its legitimacy, origin. or previous whereabouts, totally ignored or buried the last comment regarding this important document. “Dallas officials yesterday denied that such a map exists.” (Washington Post, Nov. 27.)

Is it me or is this "finding" of evidence disturbing? Where is it coming from? And why were they holding it from the FBI? if it doesn't make sense, something is VERY WRONG. And something is wrong here.

Continued Next Post.

[edit on Aug 30th 2009 by TheMythLives]

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 05:05 PM
The facts have been addressed, now the next thing we need to investigate the Crime Scene.

The Crime Scene

I will not waste to much time here, ONLY because their is no true way to KNOW. Its all speculation and good guess work none the less I will touch upon this subect.

The Grassy Knoll, the shooter identified.

We all know this one.. Need I explain?

The Sewer Shot

According to Jim Marrs:

I have heard about the possibility of a shot from the storm drain for many years and even met the daughter of a woman who said she and friends witnessed someone firing from the drain opening. But the mother refused to be interviewed and I have been unable to substantiate this story. I have always hesitated to discuss the storm drain because many years ago one of the earliest and best researchers, Penn Jones Jr., editor of the Midlothian Mirror, was ridiculed incessantly. Debunkers said he was claiming that Kennedy was shot "from a sewer." I have myself stood down in the storm drain which is located a mere six feet from the point of Kennedy’s fatal head shot. I could comfortably stand in this drain (I’m not too tall being 5’7”) and it would have been an easy pistol shot to a person sitting upright in an open convertible. Some witnesses said that one of the shots sounded hollow, had a ringing sound to it. And it could have been possible to leave the storm drain via a large drain pipe which connected to an opening behind the wooden picket fence on the notorious Grassy Knoll. But did a shot come from this drain? At the moment, there is not enough evidence to state yes, but it remains an interesting premise.

An interesting sidebar to this speculation is the fact that in the 1980s a section running vertically down the Grassy knoll collapsed. The Dallas Street Dept. found that someone had dug up a section of this drain pipe and cut away a piece about 2 feet X 4 feet and replaced the cut section. But instead of welding the section back, whoever did this simply replaced the section on the pipe and over time it gave way causing a collapse at that point. There was some speculation that perhaps an assassin had stashed his weapon in the drain pipe and was retrieved surreptitiously at a later date. This drain was connected to the storm drain at the foot of the Grassy Knoll.

JFK Jr. had announced to close friends he was planning to enter politics and run for the Senate from New York but he had not made this public. This, of course, would have placed him head to head against Hillary Clinton, who just announced she was going to run for the New York Senate seat. Since, Hillary was the first American First Lady to attend the secretive Bilderberg meetings, she obvious was the choice of the New World Order gang. Against this backdrop we learn that JFK Jr, by all accounts an excellent pilot who had always flown with an instructor in previous flights, sudden flew alone that night, got lost and dove into the sea. However, an early Coast Guard press release stated the FAA had last heard from him when he was 13 miles out on approach to the airport. This means he was not lost and was descending for a landing. Moments later, his plane dropped off the radar screen and was not recovered for two days despite the fact that the type of aircraft he was flying had an emergency transponder. Something caused his plane to lose altitude very rapidly. And according to the National Transportation Safety Board’s investigation report, the fuel switch on his plane was in the “off” position. Was he assassinated? The evidence to me indicates… most assuredly. How remains a mystery.

Jim Marrs
Sewer Shot?

A camera shot that shows People running toward the assassin in the grassy knoll and the Sewer idea examined:

These are the major theories. I know I didn't cover it in extreme detail, but I think we all know a lot about this part already. You can draw your own conclusion, I will explain my later.

So who killed Kennedy? The CIA, Secret Service, The Mafia, the Cubans, the FBI, George Bush Snr, Johnson...?? So many theories here, however, I think the Cubans are clean. And I think the rest could be guilty. With that said, the suspects must be investigated.

The Suspects

The Suspects are many so for the purpose of text space. I wil cover them Briefly:


In its final report of 1979, the House Assassinations Committee theorized that the assassination might have been masterminded by New Orleans Mafia boss Carlos Marcello. This view was endorsed by the committee's Chief Counsel, G. Robert Blakey, and Richard Billings in their 1981 book, The Plot to Kill the President, which suggests that two Mafia hitmen were involved-Oswald, firing from the book depository and another, still unknown, firing from the grassy knoll.
Marcello certainly had sufficient motive. Despite the Mafia's crucial help getting JFK elected in 1960, Marcello was apprehended and deported only a few months after JFK took office. Upon reentering the US and successfully contesting his deportation, Marcello threatened JFK's life and spoke of getting "a nut" to kill him.

The journalist, Dorothy Kilgallen, believed that the assassination of Kennedy had involved Jack Ruby and the Mafia. She also suggested that J. D. Tippet and Bernard Weismann were involved in the conspiracy.


Another theory, popular among right-wingers and anti-Castroites (among them, US ambassador to Mexico Thomas Mann, columnist Jack Anderson and Mafia lieutenant John Roselli) accuses Fidel Castro of engineering the assassination. In this scenario, Castro either recruited Oswald as the assassin or turned around a hit squad that had been sent to kill him, sending them back to shoot JFK.


David Atlee Phillips, head of the CIA's Western Hemisphere Division, told Kevin Walsh, a former investigator with the House Select Committee on Assassinations: that Kennedy had been "done in by a conspiracy, likely including rogue American intelligence people."

Gaeton Fonzi was a staff investigator for the House Select Committee on Assassinations. In his book, The Last Investigation, Fonzi takes the view that the assassination was organized by David Atlee Phillips, head of the CIA's Western Hemisphere Division.

In his book, Plausible Denial (1991), Mark Lane argues that CIA agents killed Kennedy. He claims that the conspiracy involved E.Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis.

Executive Action, was a CIA secret plan to remove unfriendly foreign leaders from power. In his book The Secret Team (1973) Leroy Fletcher Prouty claimed that elements of the CIA were worked on behalf of the interests of a "high cabal" of industrialists and bankers. He also claimed that the Executive Action unit could have been used to kill Kennedy. Prouty named CIA operative, Edward Lansdale, as the leader of the operation.


In his book, Best Evidence, David Lifton claims that members of the Secret Service agents were involved in the killing of Kennedy. This included providing the assassins with a good opportunity to kill Kennedy. Lifton was highly critical of the behaviour of William Greer, Roy Kellerman and Winston G. Lawson during the assassination. Lifton believes that after the assassination of Kennedy they hijacked the body in order to alter the corpse. In the book, Mortal Error, Bonar Menninger, claims that SS agent George Hickey killed Kennedy by accident.


J. Edgar Hoover was concerned that Kennedy would force him into retirement when he reached the age of 70. Mark North (Act of Treason) and George O'Toole (The Assassination Tapes) both believe that Hoover either knew of plans to kill Kennedy and did nothing to stop them, or he helped to organize the assassination. In his book, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK (1993) Peter Dale Scott provides information that Hoover and the Federal Bureau of Investigation helped to cover-up the real identity of the people who assassinated John F. Kennedy.


Madeleine Brown claims that she was Johnson's mistress. In her autobiography, Texas in the Morning (1997) Brown claims that the conspiracy to kill Kennedy involved Lyndon B. Johnson and several Texas oil men including Clint Murchison, Haroldson L. Hunt and J. Edgar Hoover. Joachim Joesten, an investigative journalist, believes that Johnson's secretary, Bobby Baker was involved in this plot. This theory was supported by Craig Zirbel in his book The Texas Connection: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy (1991).

Continued Next Post:

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 05:05 PM
Suspects continued-

George Bush Snr.

If nothing else, these pages will show the reader the following:

- Although he does not recall when asked, George (Herbert Walker) Bush was in Dallas the day JFK was assassinated.

- Bush lies about the fact that he was a high-ranking CIA official at the time of JFK's death.

- Bush allowed the escape of a convicted terrorist from prison to go to work for him as an undercover CIA asset in Iran-Contra.

- Bush has released another convicted terrorist.

- Both these terrorists were present on Dealey Plaza on 11/22/1963.

- Both these terrorists were convicted for killing 73 people by blowing up an airliner.

- Bush is personal friends with a close associate of these convicted terrorists, who was also a participant in Iran Contra.

- Bush has taken a leading role as CIA official in structuring/organizing these terrorists in effective organizations.
Bush CIA

And now for my conclusions and closing statments...

My Theory/Closing Statements

***Note*** I am listing the core of my theory, however, I left it open so you can draw or connect the dots with whatever you like, because to be honest no one really knows who employed Ruby, Oswald, if the orders came from LBJ. So I decided to make this one a little different and post the main factors so that way you could decide for yourself who employed who.

The day that JFK died, changed everything in the world and especially here in America. Would the world have changed if he was still alive? Who knows, but his legacy and his dream still lives on. He is among one of the most popular presidents of all time. His speeches are and were not rivaled by many, however, one bullt changed that. The shot to the head. Yet who killed Kennedy, why, how, and so many other questions. I will attempt to answer them as easily and as readable as possible.

My Prime Suspect is LBJ, not because of his mistress, but because of his pure hate for the Kennedy's. Not to mention strange phone calls made by LBJ to Hoover in which they discuss Oswald in detail. But the strange things that happened during the day of the assassination. I will do my best to provide an accurate representation and the best evidence that i know of.

The first MAJOR problem with this is that in every tape that you watch of the assassination, EXCEPT for the Zapruder film. Something major is WRONG! Windows are open at Key points. No secruity detail would allow those windows to be open, do to the possible risk of assassination. Why were the windows open? Seems like the first thing you would cover. Moving along..

Kennedy and his wife are traveling in their motorcase and then all of a sudden the two Secret Service officers meant to stand on the Back of the motorcade to protect the president are waved off.. Why?

(click to open player in new window)

Kennedy's blind spot is now open, would the bullt have reached Kennedy if they were back there?

The limo driver slowed down the car and then the fatal shots were fired, where from the school book depository? The sewer? The Knoll? Most people and experts agree the school book depository building is the where the final shots came from. Alright? Well if the shot came from the Depository than what happened

In my mind, their was someone in the Depository whether it was Oswald or not, I have no idea. But clearly there was something from the grassy knoll:

While it is blurry, a figure can be made out of the picture below... Is this the shooter?

Witnesses ran toward the knoll chasing after the assassin. However, still in my mind there would be more than two assassins. The underpass... No to open, however, the freeway above the underpass would make for an interesting shot to happen. According to the official film, Kennedy's head went back and to the left. Of course film footage by the Warren Commission (The Goat Video) showed that is is POSSIBLE that Kennedy's head could have gone back and to the left from a shot from behind. Where the shot was fired I have no idea! But that freeway above would provide a nice clean and open shot. The sewer would be useful. A firecracker could have been setup behind the Knoll, witnesses stated seeing smoke back their. Was this setup for the assassin in the Sewer or the Depository to get away?

After the assassination, strange things happened as listed above. It appears the Dallas police wanted to prosecute somebody and Oswald was just as good anyone. According to an official phone call from LBJ and Hoover the following took place:

Photo here

Wait! It just stated that Oswald does not match the man on the Tapes and his Voice does not match either? So who was there at the Soviet Embassy? A second person must have been their to pick it up! This is HUGE. Absoluetly huge...

So now we have implicated the FBI, the Secret Service, CIA (because the CIA and SS worked together that day), and we have hinted at LBJ, but what links LBJ to this wondeful world of confusion... a possible cover up?

Jack Ruby killed Oswald, later... Ruby on camera stated clearly:

(click to open player in new window)

Ruby states: The assassination would have never have happened if Stevenson was vice president. When asked to repeat what he said, he stated that you should look at the man in office now.

Could this be an implication? Could this be enough evidence to prove that a conspiracy was here?

Personally to me, it adds more fuel to the strong fire. Kennedy was assassinated in a conspiracy. Basing it all on a known Mafia agent, a Mafia agent? Not entirely and what I found next proves to me 100% that kennedy was killed by a conspiracy.

Thirteen days before Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, a man named Joseph Milteer was tape recorded telling Miami police informant William Somersett that the murder of Kennedy was "in the working," that the best means of killing Kennedy was "from an office building with a high-powered rifle," and that "they will pick up somebody within hours afterwards, if anything like that would happen just to throw the public off."

Foreknowledge of the assassination, or just a lucky guess coupled with an uncanny understanding of how such things work?

Miami Police notified the Secret Service, and there are indications that an unannounced motorcade in Miami scheduled for later that month was cancelled. After the Kennedy assassination, informant Somersett spoke to Milteer on the phone. Police and FBI interviews with Somersett revealed that Milteer was jubilant, and said that "everything ran true to form. I guess you thought I was kidding when I said he would be killed from a window with a high-powered rifle."

And this report of a military code breaker stated:

And this report:

On November 21, 1963, a government informant named Thomas Mosley was negotiating the sale of machine guns to a Cuban exile named Echevarria. In the course of the transaction, Echevarria said that "we now have plenty of money - our new backers are Jews" and would close the arms deal "as soon as we [or they] take care of Kennedy." The next day, Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas.

And of course a huge problem for me... George Burkley. Who is George? Well Mr. Burkley was kennedy's personal doctor. He was in the motorcade following the president, present at Parkland Hospital and signed for the autopsy reports, yet was never investigated by the Warren Commission... Strange.

If Kennedy was shot in the head from behind, why did the Parkland Hospital doctors all describe a large gaping wound in the rear of his head? They were mistaken, according to the Warren Commission, which relied on an autopsy report description of a "largely irregular defect" and a drawing which showed the large wound to be on the right side of the head. The autopsy report also firmly placed a small entrance wound low in the back of the head, just above and to the right of the external occipital protuberance.

The two differing descriptions turned into three when in 1968 an independent panel of experts reviewed the autopsy photos and X-rays, and declared that the entrance wound had been mis-measured at autopsy by about 4 inches! According to the Clark Panel, the entry was up in the cowlick.
Back and to the left

Confusing? Yea, I think so...

The Battle at Parkland Hospital:

And the forgery of the autoposy.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 05:05 PM

It took 15 minutes to get a description of the assassin. How on earth did they get a description 15 minutes after? It just does not make sense. The fact remains that more than 30 people in the vicinity of Kennedy’s limousine–including Dallas sheriff Bill Decker, Secret Service agent Roy Kellerman and a presidential aide David Powers all stated that they felt a shot came from the Knoll. The implications of a second shooter changes everything.

To me the above proves a conspiracy, things do not happen or fall into place so easily in fifteen minutes to catch a killer. It does not make sense, was Oswald a Patsy... possibly.. Witnesses knew a shot came from the knoll and rushed up their, that is FACT. To me a shot hit Kennedy from the front. A second shooter proves that a conspiracy is alive...

The picture above to me gives the shooter in the Sewer, grassy knoll, or the bridge a clean shot to hit Kennedy in the front of the head. Connely has moved to his left allowing a shot to come from anywhere in the front. (the above was taken from the History Channel: The Kennedy Assassination - Beyond Conspiracy).

The real question is now... was RFK killed because he was considered Americas first Conspiracy Theorist? Not quite, he was killed because he believed he knew who killed his brother and most importantly he acknowledged that a conspiracy happened. But what was the sole purpose of this, that is yet to be known and cannot be answered. Perhaps JFK was too powerful, lets face it a good number of Americans loved Kennedy and their were others who didn't. Or perhaps it was because of President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve. Maybe because Kennedy wanted to disban the CIA and the ones in power could not let that happen. The Elite saw that Kennedy was going to destroy them with the Speech kennedy made about Secret Societies. Kennedy knew what was happening if the Bankers and the Elite continued their power advancemnet, Kennedy was going to try and stop them. However, it didn't turn out that way.

Did Kennedy die of a conspiracy? Yes.
How and Why? Is still debatable.

One thing is for certain John, Rob, and Ted are all together, once again. Walking side by side, on the shores of heaven...

Thank You for your continued Support,

Liked This Case Review?

Series 1

Marilyn Monroe: The Case Reviewed

OJ Simpson: The Case Reviewed

Anna Nicole Smith: The Case Reviewed

The Black Dahlia: The Case Reviewed

The Zodiac Killer: The Case Reviewed

Series 2

Princess Diana: The Case Reviewed

Jack The Ripper: The Case Reviewed

Lord Lucan: The Case Review

The Lockerbie Bomber: The Case Reviewed

Series 3

JFK: The Case Reviewed

Have a suggestion for a case review? Send me a u2u

Thank you again.

Case Review Investigator

And thank you for viewing the Tenth case Review!

***I also want to make something very clear. After this series a new theory will be presented that might change the name of everything. RFK, MLK, JFK, Malcolm X, Monroe and many more... What links them all together? It will be explained very soon, that I promise, but i need to get the next to out of the way and present a new case review with all 4.***

This theory: The 60's, the year of the great "Clean Up" is coming soon.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 05:23 PM
reply to post by TheMythLives

HA........I saw this drop in the new thread tab and already new it was from the rising star of GenCon, my good friend, TheMythLives.

One of your better case reviewed threads my friend. I remember you telling me about a month ago you were wanting to do this one. GREAT JOB.

EDIT to add: This may be your best one yet actually.

So when are you going to come over to the UFO forum and make some threads like this?

[edit on 8/30/2009 by jkrog08]

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 05:28 PM
reply to post by jkrog08

Hey Krog, thank you my good friend
I really appreciate the support you always provide. And you think this is my best one? Wait until you see Martin luther King Jr! That is going to blow your mind, seriously, I have been working on that one NON-Stop, its going to be something.

I appreciate your kind words my friend
They mean a lot coming from a high quality member and friend like yourself.

As for the UFO/Alien board, I plan on throwing one or two case reviews in that board very soon.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 05:44 PM
This is awesome. I was very hurried to get to the end to see your conclusion. It's indeed a monumental effort to ascertain considering the massive material accumulated on this subject. People have become obsessed with this very crime; some spending literally decades studying it.
You have done a fine job here, pulling all this together in a very comprehesive style (your style) as usual.

And thank you for the kind ending, in view of the recent event of Senator Ted Kennedy's death. You handled this with much dignity and grace.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 05:47 PM
reply to post by ladyinwaiting

Thank you very much Lady
Your kind words and support truely is something special. I will miss Ted Kennedy, I loved his speeches. Every Kennedy could deliver a speech with so much passion and grace.

Thank you Lady!

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 06:05 PM
reply to post by TheMythLives

Great job as usual Myth,S+F

I had never seen about the Orvil Nicks image enhancement before, just brilliant.

Its always going to be a difficult one to research, there are just so many theories, but you did great. As jkrog08 has already said, this is your best yet.

Cant wait for the Martin Luther King Jr too!

I was going to do something regarding that case, but i knew you would be covering it eventually. I shall wait with baited breath until it arrives. Then ill put forth what i have researched.

Anyways, well done once again

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 06:09 PM
reply to post by LiveForever8

Thank you my friend, you always provide GREAT evidence when you research something and I look forward to your findings as always. Much like the Lockerbie case, you had GREAT info and I appreciate you bringing that to my thread! As they say I do my best and MLK is going to be absolutely crazy, I really cannot wait to release it, but I have

Thank you my good friend

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 06:21 PM
Well S&F as ever for you - possibly the holy grail of all conspiracies... and I think the beginning of the end as far as shadow government goes. Makes me think of the Bill Hicks skit...

another one taken before his time.

The main thrust of the evidence present seems to suggest an inside job and with such a wide-range of potential suspects, it makes for great obfuscation as to who really might've been behind it. I actually think though, that all the suspects were probably involved, making any real accountability much more difficult - I realise the flaw in that argument is that it increases the likelihood of someone talking but... If you have just one "real" shooter and a couple of others that think they're real yet given blanks maybe, you get a firing squad situation, where no man knows if they did it.

Oswald always seemed a bit too "fringey" to be of real merit as an assassin of this magnitude, however for a patsy - great case, I'm also willing to take into account some of the "mind control" theories that are bandied about that may well have been used in this scenario... leading us on to Jack Ruby - always struck me as very odd, why did he shoot Oswald? Perhaps coerced, what sort of pressure could have been put on him to do what he did and his death and statement that he'd been given cancer. Really strange.

So ultimately I think the CIA was behind it, yet perhaps for "political" advantage decided to bring in a couple of other organisations, perhaps to solidify their relationships - and I say that only half jokingly, maybe to show they really could do what the hell they pleased and were truly unstoppable.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 06:54 PM
reply to post by jokei

Excellent addition my friend! I had never heard of Bill Hicks before, so this was awesome. I liked your comment about the blanks given out instead of real bullets, that was interesting!

Thank you my friend.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 06:57 PM
As a 5th grader at the time of his death.....I was there. I must say it's long overdue that we know the truth. Why are the archives locked for so many years with regard to this? We do all know at this poin it was a take over of our government. We know that we are pawns and allow this to go forward. I wish the truth.

JFK was a dangerous man......a MAN that went to the throat of our worst foes.......I a conservative thought him a good man. I wish the truth to be told.

It's time for light to fall and cast the shadows away.


posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 07:01 PM
reply to post by enigmalone

That is so true, its time for the light and the secrets to be revealed as Kennedy talked about. Secrets are repugnant in a free or open society.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 08:06 PM
Every time this subject is brought up I am reminded of this picture. How did the alleged shooter get from the steps of the building to his shooting position in a short period of time?

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 08:11 PM
reply to post by calcoastseeker

Cool photo however, I am not sure that is indeed Oswald. But it does resemble the clothes he wore that day. But for some reason his clothes their look more leathery than cotten... But its still pretty interesting none the less! Thank you for sharing.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 08:52 PM
reply to post by TheMythLives

Star, and flag to the OP for one heck of a lot of work.

I have seen footage where it appears the driver turning around, and what appears to be a chrome pistol pointing at the president.... Could the driver have done it?

Also, my bet with who did it is in the secret societies Kennedy is always speaking about.

It is my contention, and belief that Aristotle Onassis was the primary figure who ordered the hit.

It's widely rumored that he was an illuminist; tied heavily with both the mob, and government.

I believe Jacky Kennedy was as is the custom within the mob, costa nostra, and other similar groups to take trophies. I believe she was that exactly.

It was A. Onassis who took her as a trophy of conquest....

Just my two pesos.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 09:10 PM
reply to post by sanchoearlyjones

The infamous driver shot Kennedy theory, the evidence just is not their. If he shot Kennedy you would expect to hear a loud bang, Connelly and Jacie both would have seen the Flash of the gun. The driver turned around to view what happened to Kennedy. If he had a gun, he would have to reach above the seat and aim, you cannot just turn and POW. You actually have to look. This website does a good job of that:


He just did not have the shot or the angle to get the shot off correctly.

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 09:27 PM
Wow, this is fantastic read!!!

I dont know what else I could add. Its certainly a case that need to be investigated over and over again, due to the contradictory evidence from all sides

Thanks Myth

S & F

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in