It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Netanyahu has pledged not to build any new settlements but wanted to enable what he called "natural growth" of existing enclaves.
Isn't Netanyahu great at playing with semantics?
partial and temporary settlement freeze
A partial and temporary freeze, what does partial mean percentage wise and how long is temporary?
Again playing with semantics.
Originally posted by CuteAngel
Look at how the protests went
[...]
Do we need more of this. You decide!!!
Originally posted by CuteAngel
www.wnd.com...
Originally posted by CuteAngel
reply to post by dzonatas
Who brought up the topic of the LA riots when talking about the situation dealing with sanctions on Iran as well Palestinian settlements.
Meaningless...?
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
Hi matt, You say it's peace, and equality more, or less in Jerusalem???
original.antiwar.com... This article discusses how the Palestinians were promised equality, but then came apartheid, and living in tints outside of homes that once were theres.
uruknet.com... Here's an article of the Israeli military destroying all roads leading into a Palestinian Village. No supplies, no food, no water.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com... Here's more equality. In this article We can see not only English, but also Arabic have been banned from street signs, and govt. postings.
Now all the cities with either English, or Arabic names will have a Hebrew name. Hey, it's all peaceful, and full of equality as long as You do what Your told; right?
news.yahoo.com...
This last article was part of the original point in this thread. It's the original warning from the US after meeting with Israeli officials. The US tells Iran they only have 8 weeks, or else!!!! The article in the OP was about 3 weeks into the 8.
So You tell me how the article in the OP, and the last one above don't point toward war posturing?
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
reply to post by mrmonsoon
Iran has no nuclear bomb program. Your siting out of thin air. Iran is not doing anything, but minding their own business.
On topic the OP was about war posturing by Israel, and the US. Not throwing out crud about bomb programs...... You guys need to wake up; where are all the WMD's from Iraq?
Same ole' same ole'
Under Mohammad Reza Pahlavi's father, the government supported advancements by women against child marriage, polygamy, exclusion from public society, and education segregation. However, independent feminist political groups were shut down and forcibly integrated into one state-created institution, which maintained many paternalistic views. Despite substantial opposition from Shiite religious jurists, the Iranian feminist movement, led by activists such as Fatemah Sayyeh, achieved further advancement under Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. His regime's changes focused on the civil sphere, and private-oriented family law remained restrictive, although the 1967 and 1975 Family Protection Laws attempted to reform this trend.[59] Specifically, women gained the right to become ministers such as Farrokhroo Parsa and judges such as Shirin Ebadi, as well as any other profession regardless of their gender.
Achievements The Shah made major changes to curb the power of certain ancient elite factions by expropriating large and medium-sized estates for the benefit of more than four million small farmers. In the White Revolution, he took a number of major modernization measures, including extending suffrage to women, much to the discontent and opposition of the Islamic clergy, the participation of workers in factories through shares and other measures, the improvement of the educational system through new elementary schools and literacy courses set up in remote villages by the Imperial Iranian Armed Forces. The latter step was called "Sepāh e Dānesh", "Army of Knowledge". As part of the White Revolution, the Armed Forces were engaged in infrastructural and other educational projects throughout the country ("Sepāh e Tarvij va Âbādāni") as well as in health education and promotion ("Sepāh e Behdāsht").
I am abosulety on topic. You seemed to be focused on telling everyone with evidence they are off topic, or trying to derail the thread.
That is very interesting but completly off topic.
If you read the title," Report :Israel to freeze settle mets in exchange for tougher santions on Iran.
That is the topic, like it or not.
The only personal agenda I have is for People to live, and let live. Iran isn't doing anything to Israel... Israel is increasingly posturing for war with Iran. Iran happens to be in close proximity to the Caucusas; which the US was helping to keep in a constant state of war in the 90's, and did again in the recent Georgian invasion of South Ossetia. All this is about power, and dealing all the way back to the NWO/Illuminati. The People in control of both the US, and Israel are not of those respective People. Jew, Christian, or Muslim We are all cannon fodder to them. I am only trying to draw attention to war posturing; what war is ever good?....doesn't exist, it's an oxy moron to a sane person.
Personally, I just can't see how you can think your personal agendia against Israel is even remotely close to the actual topic.
You mean this u2u; as it's the only time I've ever, or will ever u2u, right? I was, am trying to keep the thread clean without constant belittling, or throwing out arguments that have no merit. I really hope no mod takes this comment down as I am only responding to someone saying I threatened them. As a case in point; I did Alert Masqua, and an alert that You weren't on topic....only after waiting to see if You simply change Your post to reflect the topic.
BTW, sending insulting and threatening u2u's are against TAC, it's ok, you will be contacted by the norad and have it explained to you.
I could flip that retorical question around on You. How doesn't it show war posturing? The settlements are illegal. With the overwhelming proof, and Israel's own nod to the fact, how can it even be in the realm of sanity, what's going on....."We'll quit illegally taking Palestinians homes, lands, and bulldozing communities, only if You create a situation of war with Iran.
So, please explain to me and all on this board, how does freezing settlements in exchange for tougher sanctions on Iran have to do with your imaginary war stance-presumedly against Iran?
Oh, lastly, how am I sitting on thin air???
Am I levitating???
Originally posted by CuteAngel
reply to post by dzonatas
Prior to the Islamic revolution of 1979, Iran was the most developed as well as powerful country in the ME thanks to the west and had a very large educated population.
One of the main reasons to overthrow the Shah was because HE RECOGNIZED ISRAEL AS AN INDEPENDENT JEWISH STATE.
Execution of Gays
Violence after elections
Apart from this a few sources claim that they are carrying out proxy wars by supporting Hizballah as well as Hamas.
Ahmedinejad has openly spoken against what he calls 'Zionist Regime' in Israel.
And now they are aspiring for a few nukes.
What reaction do you expect from Israel...? Tell me which country is aspiring for nukes more than ever in the ME as of now..? This Israel views as a threat.
Now as far as Palestinian land goes, the land belongs to the last nation that conquered it
Originally posted by CuteAngel
reply to post by dzonatas
Again your comparing apples and oranges and twisting my words.
The execution of Gays as well as the protests show the aggressive and inhumane nature of the leadership. And with all the rhetoric as well as rant against the Zionists how do you expect Israel to behave.
There are many countries in the middle east such as Saudi, Yemen, Oman, Iraq, Kuwait. Seriously...whose aiming to obtain nukes. Only 1 nation is...If they would only change the leadership, at least for a short duration; they would be better off. My guess is Israel would aim for the nuclear plants alone. They have nothing to pick with the populace. So I'm guessing ur an Ahmedinejad fan...
Originally posted by mattpryor
reply to post by miss_silver
Okay Proto
If "derailing a thread" means being the first person to (politely) post something that isn't anti-Israeli and completely one sided, then I shall look forward to derailing many more threads of this nature.