It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
U.S. President Barack Obama is close to breaking the stalemate between Israel and the Palestinians by getting Israel to agree to a partial settlement freeze in exchange for a tougher U.S. stand against Iran's nuclear program, the British Guardian reported.
The report, which cites U.S., European, Israeli and Palestinian officials, said that Obama will be ready to announce the resumption of long-stalled peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians by the end of September.
"The message is: Iran is an existential threat to Israel; settlements are not," the Guardian quoted one officia
"The message is: Iran is an existential threat to Israel; settlements are not," the Guardian quoted one official close to the negotiations as saying.
Existential Threat Surprisingly NOT something one finds covered in a college philosophy textbook, this is regarded as a military or terrorist threat to the existence of something, usually the United States. Usually involves nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons.
"It has been pretty hard going but we are getting there," the Guardian quoted another official as saying. "We are closer to a deal with the Israelis than many think. The Arabs are more difficult to pin down."
Netanyahu has pledged not to build any new settlements but wanted to enable what he called "natural growth" of existing enclaves.
partial and temporary settlement freeze
In exchange for Israel agreeing to a partial and temporary settlement freeze, the U.S., Britain and France would push the United Nations Security Council to expand sanctions on Iran to include its oil and gas industry, the report said.
Originally posted by mattpryor
Sorry to p*ss all over your Israel-bashing thread, but I have to (respectfully) disagree with all of the above posts.
Israeli concerns over a nuclear Iran are very real. As far as Israelis are concerned an Iran with nukes and the disposition to use them, or even to threaten to use them, represents an existential threat to Israel and to all the people living there.
It also represents a huge threat to US and Western interests and to Middle East stability (yes, at the moment the Middle East is more stable than it's ever been, at least since WWI. Thanks to Israel and the US). A nuclear Iran will become the major player in the Middle East. Do you seriously think that will be a good thing?
And why should Israel make concessions to the demands of Palestinian terrorists without anything in return?
Originally posted by mattpryor
Israelis only ever act in self defence and to maintain regional stability at their borders. They do not flaunt their nuclear capability
In fact nuclear weapons are pretty much useless for Israel, since all of Israel's conflicts are regional - they'd hardly drop a nuke on their own border.
History will prove me right, because Iran WILL have nuclear weapons sooner or later, and the world will change for the worse when it does.
Originally posted by mattpryor
reply to post by SyphonX
Israelis only ever act in self defence and to maintain regional stability at their borders.