It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Navieko
Just because you weren't able to see any 'deeper meaning', doesn't mean one didn't exist. In fact, it was really quite obvious as many have already pointed out.
There is a reason why just about all the top critics are praising this movie as one of the best scifi's in a long time, ya know? ...but you surely know better, right?
Comparing the budget of this movie to almost any other 'Hollywood blockbuster' made these days, this movie is a low-budget film. To say you could do better is just being dishonest.
There is a reason why just about all the top critics are praising this movie as one of the best scifi's in a long time, ya know? ...but you surely know better, right?
why do you think your opinion of the movie differs so much from the hard to please critics who thought it was good?
District 9 is a film directed by Peter Jackson which tells a story of an alien space ship which is stationary above Johanasberg.
Originally posted by Sargoth
I'm a Sci-Fi buff but I hated this movie!! The story, the aliens, everything was horrible and depressing. No babes, no great effects, this movie had nothing I liked.
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by Sargoth
obviously p jackson has better taste in movies than you. Considering its been critically accliamed and raked it in at the box offfice I'm tipping this movie to be nominated at the oscars (best picture category.) :p
[edit on 7-9-2009 by yeti101]
Originally posted by Annee
You consider that good Sci-Fi? How sad.
Originally posted by Annee
I'm still debating whether to see it on the big screen. I really don't like violence.
Originally posted by Clickfoot
Originally posted by Annee
You consider that good Sci-Fi? How sad.
Agreed...
Originally posted by Annee
I'm still debating whether to see it on the big screen. I really don't like violence.
The 'violence' has been seriously overstated. There's nothing there that's particularly bad. In some countries it has a 14 or 15 rating, and most of that is probably because of overuse of the 'F' word. I don't have a problem with that AT ALL, but even I noticed that FAR more than the violence.
Go see it
Originally posted by Annee
Words don't bother me. Blood or quick violence doesn't bother me - such as sword fighting in the "300". Something that would bother me is lingering torture - showing someone in great physical pain.
Originally posted by yeti101
Your shocked a producer would want to make a highly successful movie both critically & financially. Amazing