It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ChemBreather
Originally posted by jeddun
All i had to read was the heading..in fact it's ALL i read before this posted reply....first indicator it's BS is the remark "deep under the tectonic plates" i figure its safe to assume that any 'being' even a bit smarter than us would know you dont build anything around sliding continental plates!! LOL nice try!
No, not 'under', but 'Into' the tectonic plates...
I figure if you have a 'house' in the TecPlate, the house would move with the TecPlate.. Just an assumption ....
Originally posted by Wormwood Squirm
Originally posted by ChemBreather
Originally posted by jeddun
All i had to read was the heading..in fact it's ALL i read before this posted reply....first indicator it's BS is the remark "deep under the tectonic plates" i figure its safe to assume that any 'being' even a bit smarter than us would know you dont build anything around sliding continental plates!! LOL nice try!
No, not 'under', but 'Into' the tectonic plates...
I figure if you have a 'house' in the TecPlate, the house would move with the TecPlate.. Just an assumption ....
tectonic plates, although only still a theory, only move at about the same rate your fingernails grow so it would take thousands of years to move noticeably. I don't believe in the plate tectonics theory personally, I am more inclined to believe Neil Adams earth is Growing theory
But, I am confused, since, if the Ex.Earth is true, then how does the Moon smash into the Earth fit the Picture ??
Originally posted by Kandinsky
This period of our Solar System is one that strikes a deep chord of wonderment in me. Imagine a lifeless system? All is chaos. All these collisions, vast masses spinning around an infant star. I imagine the feeling religious people have when reading Genesis, is close to how I perceive these early events...profoundly.
Originally posted by internos
reply to post by m4ng4n
You live in a SAFE area. It was a fault that clashed in half december 2008 if im correct, 4.5/5 richter. Don't worry, earth shakes. One thing i can tell you: you won't die because of an earthquake.The blue dot is the bad guy, the small red dot is you.
The blue is not a dot actually, it's a line but the image shows the range in case of some shock close to you. A strong one would look like that blue dot. When i say strong i mean strong.
antimonite.blogsome.com...
No, it wont't harm you. Trust me. If you need detailed data i will provide you with them, and will tell you why you are on a safe place.
[edit on 15/8/2009 by internos]
Originally posted by m4ng4n
A late reply some 24 hours later, but anyways
I was just concidering the chart you presented and felt that i had to represent the "low possibility" area... Which of course is as you state.
At the time I was in my car on my way to work and didn´t even notice the event! Altough a companion of mine was complaining about the mates shaking his traction device when he was sleeping in his trailer at the construction site...
Only a comparison...
Originally posted by mckyle
reply to post by internos
Mate, I'm just wondering: there was allegedly at least one photo taken of what the Senior Scientist, Anil Kulkarni, described as a"robot-like" UFO descending the mountain towards their camp, in the Chandra basin glacier.
I've looked for that photo on numerous occasions, but have found nothing
Have you seen the photo in question?
Seems suspicious that it appears nowhere to be found
So, where does the Planet collisions fit this theoery ? It dont in my eyes, a cover up artificial Moon ??
Some people blindly accept the Pangeae theory, which I find more or less un-plausable sins half the earth would be without mass,at all..
Antarctic Prehistory
Until 55 million years ago, the history of life on Antarctica was very similar to that on other southern continents, especially Australia. The fossil record is very similar with abundant plants and animals, including those that lived on land. There are abundant plant fossils in many areas of Antarctica from this period.
Originally posted by internos
P.S.#2: glad that you appreciate Kandinsky, you actually choose your friends wisely, and i'm proud to be a part of your buddy list