It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One of the first rules of warfare is to keep your enemy in the dark about what you are going to do to them. So if you think about it that way, it's sorta obvious this is just more grandstanding.
TOKYO, July 2 (AP) - (Kyodo)—The government plans to submit to the Diet on Tuesday a bill to inspect cargo carried by ships and boats sailing to and from North Korea, Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura said Thursday. At an executive meeting of the House of Representatives steering committee, Kawamura said the government plans to approve the bill at an extraordinary Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, lawmakers said. The bill is aimed at enabling the Japan Coast Guard to inspect North Korean vessels suspected of carrying nuclear- or missile-related items in line with a U.N. Security Council resolution adopted in response to North Korea's nuclear test in May. Under conventional laws, the Japanese Self-Defense Forces can inspect cargo on the high seas only in a situation in which Japan is under armed attack, or in a situation that could develop into a direct armed attack against Japan if left unaddressed
The bill is aimed at enabling the Japan Coast Guard to inspect North Korean vessels suspected of carrying nuclear- or missile-related items in line with a U.N. Security Council resolution adopted in response to North Korea's nuclear test in May.
I'm near positive the man is dead and that they are trying to stop the pillage of the arsenal as in the former USSR.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
One flaw: Nukes dont explode by just hitting the ground so it doesnt matter if the missile is detroyed. A nuclear explosion occurs because the mass goes super critical which requires an explosion to do so. This wont happen by just dropping a nuke on the ground.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Ok,
I see the reasoning of your statement.
For those who don't, I will explain...
When a missile is being shot-down, it is done (or preferred) to destroy it on the "upward arc".
Can it still be shot-down on the downward arc???
I "believe" it can still be done, however it is MUCH more difficult/challenging to do so.
Also, if the missile does have an active warhead, and you shoot it on the downward arc, you risk the warhead falling on the US and exploding, even if not where they had wanted.
Also note, the US just tested a minutemen 3 icbm with 3 payload's (not active) 4000 miles and all 3 of the payload hit their target.
Just to be a ponce about it, I wonder how little kimmy would like it if the US shot a icbm or two that would travel over N.K.????
[edit on 7/1/2009 by mrmonsoon]
July 2 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. doesn’t see any indication North Korea is poised to test-launch a long-range ballistic missile capable of landing near the Hawaiian Islands, according to four government officials.
The officials, who are privy to information about North Korean launch preparations, said there are no signs of the work necessary to launch a long-range missile during the U.S. July 4 Independence Day celebration.
VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. -- The Air Force says it has successfully launched an unarmed Minuteman 3 intercontinental ballistic missile from a California base, firing it to targets in the Pacific Ocean.
SEOUL, South Korea — North Korea is highly likely to test-fire a barrage of missiles in coming days, a news report said Thursday, a move that would aggravate the already-high tensions following Pyongyang's nuclear test and U.N. sanctions. The North is expected to launch short- or medium-range missiles, including banned ballistic rockets, from two sites on its east coast in early July, the South Korean newspaper JoongAng Ilbo reported, citing an unidentified intelligence source.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Ok,
I see the reasoning of your statement.
For those who don't, I will explain...
When a missile is being shot-down, it is done (or preferred) to destroy it on the "upward arc".
Can it still be shot-down on the downward arc???
I "believe" it can still be done, however it is MUCH more difficult/challenging to do so.
Also, if the missile does have an active warhead, and you shoot it on the downward arc, you risk the warhead falling on the US and exploding, even if not where they had wanted.
Also note, the US just tested a minutemen 3 icbm with 3 payload's (not active) 4000 miles and all 3 of the payload hit their target.
Just to be a ponce about it, I wonder how little kimmy would like it if the US shot a icbm or two that would travel over N.K.????
[edit on 7/1/2009 by mrmonsoon]
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by WhatTheory
Thank you for the link -
Did you start a thread in Breaking News?
If you did I’ll follow you there.
Thank you tons!
peace
I don't know why this is so complex.