It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by wmd_2008
so are you saying depthoffield is wrong and these are not stars ?
if they are stars everything you just wrote is a bunch of baloney
How do you work that out!
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by wmd_2008
How do you work that out!
sorry but i'm not going to keep repeating myself. go back and read my previous posts and you will see why if those are stars as DOF claims they are...YOU are wrong.
If you look at the video you see his sketch tether length is 12 miles so if object passes behind tether as you lot claim it looks like
the dia of the object is about 1/10th-1/12th the tether length so would have to be about a mile across minimum at that distance.
The optical effect that makes it seem that the object passes behind the tether is due to light levels and contrast between the objects
NOT the lens constuction.
The shape of this object is due to the lens conctruction.
The thing is the thickness of the tether has nothing to do with the dia of the object as we do see an know how long the tether was so if behind the tether they would be at least a mile in dia.
Link to a video a different lens on an out of focus point of light
(please read the more info on this link)
www.youtube.com...
Similar effect to the tether objects
Reflecting telescope with a star out of focus
www.youtube.com...
Wow that's funny similar effect so dont say its not due to the construction of the optics of the camera!
Here another for good measure
www.youtube.com...
Let me think.
So you are saying, at that distance and the length of the tether cable all objects near the tether has to be one mile in diameter (or bigger), but it's totally OK for the tether cable diameter to be 2.54 cm in diameter and still be visible at that distance.
Weird isn't it?
I'm not disputing the fact that this happens and that it exists.
I'm more or less considering other alternatives for the camera artefact theory.
What makes me hesitant to consider the camera artefact theory is that there is allot of things to consider, like the physics in microgravity, speed of the shuttle, where the debris are coming from, why they stay around for so long around the shuttle, and why they are not a constant with the shuttle.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by wmd_2008
What is obvious, from the thickness of the tether, FAR FAR thicker in the video than it is in reality, is that it is distorted. We know that the tether is not floating a meter or two outside of the shuttle, but yet it is distorted. The UFOs could easily be as distant from the shuttle as the tether is, and equally distorted as the tether, which is what the situation appears to be.
If the tether appeared as a very thin slice of brightness, then it could be claimed that the UFOs were camera distortions of up close objects, but being that the thickness of the tether is so over exaggerated, then clearly, what we see in the video is distorted at the distance of the tether itself, being that the tether itself is distorted.
Are you really trying to be dumb lets look at what you said above
You JUST IGNORE the reasons why!!!! the cable is visible although only 2.5 cm thick. If that image on screen of the cable length is X and and if the dia of an object which you guys claim passes BEHIND is 1/10th -1/12 th the length of x and we know x is approx 20 miles long the that object must be at least 20/12 or 1.667 miles in dia minimum!.
I have given reasons why the cable can be seen although its only 2.5 cm thick the charge built up in it, the reflected sunlight and the overexposure of the image. Some of your fellow believers even claimed PLASMA surrounding the tether.
Now lets see you agreee camera artifacts happen because i gave you various links to the SAME thing happening with lenes and telescopes.
Now you just want to FORGET about that because you think somehow microgravity,the shuttle speed and where the debris comes from causes the artifacts well a lot of the debris is just travelling along with the shuttle so speed is similar so please explain how any of this BS actually would cause the artifact. I mean you have evidence of how the lens can cause it but why just except it when it doesn't concur with your warped reality!
Did you actually look at the video did you follow the object your fellow believer poet1b asked me to follow it has the typical shape but guess what happens when the camera zooms out it comes into focus as a point of light
its still in the same microgravity etc all that change was the camera zoom and focus yet according to what you claim its not the camera so please explain!
What other objects 2.5 cm dia at the distance of the tether?
At no point in time have I said any of these objects are close to the tether you guys claim the objects pass behind but me and others on here have stated thats an effect due to the difference in brightness of the objects and the fact that the objects close to the shuttle are out of focus due to a depth of field effect.
When I spoke about the speed of the object the relative speed of the objects to the shuttle is not that great and whats really interesting about YOUR THEORY that the microgravity and speed causes the effect ,then its the fact the objects are as far away as the tether make your mind up you have NO evidence for your speed micro gravity claim its a BS statement to deflect from the real evidence given in the other links I posted about lens artifacts.
Its funny that you and poet1b haven't commented on the fact that your objects display thai CLASSIC out of focus bokeh shape yet when the camera zooms out they pop nicley into focus and look like a small bright point.
How does the tether look when the camera zooms out? As a solid white line, without the hollowness in it. Well when zoomed in on the tether looks like it is hollowed out on the inside and you only see the white on the sides of that hollowness, quite similar to what happens when there is zoom on these objects, you get this hollowness in the middle, same thing happens with the tether, the problem is, the tether is soo much longer than the other small pieces floating around with it.
Now if these objects YOU and others claim are at the distance of the tether and are being distoted as you claim (with no reason) the same way as the tether we can say the width of the objects are exaggerated but the length of the object would still be relative to the length of the tether!
Now can you please explain why the objects shrink in all diections when the camera zooms out ie larger circle to smaller circle to a point of light.
Wating for your answers!
Originally posted by Balez
First i want an explanation of the optical effect on the tether cable itself.