New Analysis Video of the STS-75 Tether Incident , page 131

Pages: << 128 129 130 131 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 75 times

reply posted on 9-3-2010 @ 10:33 AM by Mr. Mephistopheles

Hi:

Jim Oberg has offered to help get Brian O’Leary’s biography on NASA’s site:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

and Brian sent Jim an email last week, but it was to his public address, and it may have been lost in the spam, because as of a couple of minutes ago, Brian had not yet heard back from Jim. I do not have enough posts to send a U2U, and the ATS administrators won’t forward a U2U to Jim (I have been trying for days), and he was on ATS within the past hour. Could one of you U2U JIm, and let him know that we are trying to contact him?

Thanks.

reply posted on 10-3-2010 @ 01:57 PM by Mr. Mephistopheles

We finally were able to connect with Jim Oberg. Thanks for anybody who helped.

reply posted on 16-11-2010 @ 02:24 PM by mcrom901

some new data re the orbital operations....

the flash evaporator system water dump (scheduled: met day 7 - 11:45) was initiated the next day @ 062:08:04 gmt i.e. 08:11:46 MET

whereas the video had been captured the day before @ met 7/08:53 - 7/09:23 (gmt 061:05:11 - 061:05:41)

Originally posted by mcrom901
furthermore... in regards to the chaotic trajectory deviations of sub objects, it is generally believed that said flightpath changes are simply due to plumes from the thruster firings....

according to the flight plan, the maneuver activity was scheduled @ 7/2:25

whereas... the footage was captured around met 7/8:53

vector aftereffects from +6 hrs

the flight maneuver activity (thruster firings) which had been scheduled @ met 7/2:25 according to the flight plan, had actually been executed earlier 'prcs 4' @ met 7/00:25 - 06:20:43 gmt i.e. +8 hours prior the tether footage...

ntrs.nasa.gov...

reply posted on 16-11-2010 @ 04:03 PM by ArMaP

reply to post by mcrom901

If it's new data why is it all inside "quote" tags?

Or is the new data on the link?

reply posted on 16-11-2010 @ 10:32 PM by mcrom901

reply to post by ArMaP

i had posted it in the other sts-75 thread.... just wanted to cross link the data...

reply posted on 17-11-2010 @ 02:09 AM by Arbitrageur

Originally posted by mcrom901

ntrs.nasa.gov...

That's what's in the report but that can't be right for OMS-3. It can't be both 3 days and 13 days after OMS-2 as that says, it must be one or the other, right?

reply posted on 17-11-2010 @ 07:38 AM by ArMaP

reply to post by mcrom901

OK, thanks.

But I think that in that case you should have posted a link to that other thread.

reply posted on 17-11-2010 @ 08:23 AM by mcrom901

Originally posted by Arbitrageur

Originally posted by mcrom901

ntrs.nasa.gov...
That's what's in the report but that can't be right for OMS-3. It can't be both 3 days and 13 days after OMS-2 as that says, it must be one or the other, right?

the 0 should have been 1.... typo

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by mcrom901

OK, thanks.

But I think that in that case you should have posted a link to that other thread.

i hadn't included the link cause i had edited the quotes.... anyways here.... www.abovetopsecret.com...

Pages: << 128 129 130 131 >> ^^TOP^^