It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by depthoffield
it is what you say with the mouth half closed: camera distorsion... which i named it as what it is: bokeh. So, if it is camera distorsion, then we should not look and wonder at this "behavior" as belonging to those "ufo's", because instead is a camera effect.
Originally posted by zorgon
It's a lot more than 'static' electricity... it's actually enough to KILL an astronaut. It's all about PLASMA not static electricity
Altitude and Latitude Range of Applicability
These guidelines are intended for space systems that spend the majority of their time at altitudes between 200 and 1000 km (usually known as Low Earth Orbit (LEO) applications) and at latitudes between about + and 50 degrees. That is, space systems that do not (often) encounter the auroral ovals of electron streams, that do not encounter GEO (geosynchronous orbit) charging conditions, and that do not fly through the Van Allen belts. For the extreme radiation protection that is necessary for those orbits, exterior spacecraft charging will likely be a secondary concern.
Originally posted by JScytale Why? The sun. Its radiation is absolutely lethal without the protection of the atmosphere.
Originally posted by zorgon
Nah they are obviously 'critters'... nice try though
Originally posted by depthoffield It really can't be beaten.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by depthoffield It really can't be beaten.
Why thank you...
It was getting to be like a broken record in here. But its funny that NO ONE tackled the camera that actually took the footage of the 'critters' to see if it really could create your imaginary bokehs..
I mean Jim DID link to the info
Originally posted by easynow
check out this new video that LunaCognita has made about the tether incident. this new analysis shows the objects are clearly changing direction. is there an invisible force present causing debri particles to act like this or are they controlled objects ?
make sure to read what is in the more info section on the youtube page under LunaCognita's name...
www.youtube.com...
I have built a series of flightpath tracking animations that were constructed from "stable sequences" of the original raw STS75 tether footage. For the purposes of this presentation, the term "stable sequence" refers to a segment of footage in which the camera platform remains perfectly stable - with no movement, shaking, or zoom interference that would serve to compromise the accuracy of the object flightpath tracks.
As you will see, the flightpath tracking animations reveal that many objects experience some very impressive delta-v changes, with some objects floating across the FOV in "delicate arc" trajectories, and others exhibiting far more dramatic changes in flightpath that in some cases appears to result in abrupt 180-degree shifts in the velocity vector. These flightpath deviations must be due to either some external force acting upon the object (push/pull), or alternatively, we must also consider that there could be an internal force or thrust being emitted from the object itself that accounts for the changes in trajectory and velocity observed (the second option would of course denote some level of intelligent control being involved). You will also witness some objects that appear to materialize and de-materialize directly into or out of the scene
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I think you have already shown that it's bokeh before but this should be even more convincing. I hope it convinces some of the "skeptics" and by that I mean the people who are skeptical about it being bokeh!
Originally posted by depthoffield
Studying more those strange "maneuveurs", i propose one animation taken from one stable sequence of LunarCognita.
I've marked on the sequence, 5 moments in time when there are discernable those misterious maneuvers.
These moments, called by me "changes", are marked by me with colors and numbers, in order:
CHANGE1 red
CHANGE2 green
CHANGE3 blue
[color=Gray]CHANGE4 gray
CHANGE5 yellow
Also, when one namely change appears, i'll marked on the frame the position of all objects of which i can detect some changes in motion, using the corresponding colour of that namely change.
Here is the animation:
What we see here?
That it happens that all the "misterious" maneuvers of the objects are taking place in the same time, the moment of the "change"!
More, we can see that different objects with the same speed and appearance, appear to do exactly the same kind of motion/speed change (maneuver), for example those 3 bright objects in the bottom left corner.
What does this means?
It means two posibilities:
a) the objects make real maneuvers, in sincron, so they show inteligence and connections between them
b) the maneuvers of the objects are not real, but the camera together with the shuttle itself make maneuvers, because of the Reaction control system of the shuttle in action (en.wikipedia.org...), when finely and with precission make small adjustements in the shuttle attitude or motion vector as part of it's flight in orbit.
If we look with attention, we can see clearly that even the stars themselves, those apparently imobile bright or dimmer points of light, appear to do some kind of small maneuveurs, exactly at the precise moments ("changes") marked by me!
This really rules out the "inteligence" factor needed to explain the "misterious maneuvers of the objects!
And, you know, debris in space can appear to (or really) have curved trajectories!
one example:
I hope i answered a bit to OP questions regarding movements of the sts-75 objects, particles of debris
I think some of those which reject the "bokeh" explanation, and i reffer to only those which just in silent read this topic, may indeed be more convinced about "bokeh" solution. But i have my doubts that some of those which are "skeptics" about bokeh, and post here, will ever accept the "bokeh" explanation, simple because their ego and tons of their writings (here or there) simply always dismissed the solution.