It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
reply to post by JimOberg
Jim: for the third time: please comment about whether the shuttle is a capable vehicle to send astronauts to the moon including landers in its vast storage space, or not.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
Nice try, but no cigar. Your video example is a nice attempt but those ice particles are near the shuttle, not 100 miles away in which case the lens would have focused past them and even if they were seen they would be ghostly images, not detailed as these ice particles are.
Originally posted by easynow
from the movie series "From The Earth To The Moon"
it's just a movie but what's up with the plasma scene at 1:00 ?
why would they put that in a movie ?
By the time they reached Tananrive they were in darkness again and Aldrin was working methodically through the list of stars. To his surprise, repeatedly holding the cable release for the two-minute exposures made his fingers ache. "When I rub my gloves together," he noted in fascination, there is static electricity between them." Once his eyes had fully adapted to the darkness, he had noticed that his gloves glowed. Experimenting, he found that rubbing his thumb against his index finger induced an electrostatic effect, evidently resulting from passing through the ionosphere - in effect, he was flying though a sea of electrons.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur I guess it's easier still for static electricity to build up. Was it all from passing through the ionosphere, or could simply rubbing his gloves have generated static electricity?
Altitude and Latitude Range of Applicability
These guidelines are intended for space systems that spend the majority of their time at altitudes between 200 and 1000 km (usually known as Low Earth Orbit (LEO) applications) and at latitudes between about + and 50 degrees. That is, space systems that do not (often) encounter the auroral ovals of electron streams, that do not encounter GEO (geosynchronous orbit) charging conditions, and that do not fly through the Van Allen belts. For the extreme radiation protection that is necessary for those orbits, exterior spacecraft charging will likely be a secondary concern.
Overview of Plasma Interactions
When energized conductors are exposed to plasma, positive surfaces collect electrons while negative surfaces collect ions. The Poisson equation governs charge movement.
To illustrate the basic effects, consider first a hypothetical experiment. Suppose two metal spheres a few feet in diameter are initially connected by a conductor and placed in LEO some distance apart. Since electrons are collected more easily than ions, both spheres will charge to the same potential, within a volt or two of plasma potential. Now suppose a high voltage battery is placed between them with one sphere connected to the negative terminal and the other to the positive. On earth, in air, such an arrangement would result in half of the battery voltage appearing on each sphere. But in LEO, highly mobile electrons stream to the positive sphere while the negative sphere struggles to collect the massive ions. Both experience and modeling indicate that approximately 90% of the battery voltage will appear on the negative sphere while only 10% will be on the positive one with respect to the plasma potential.
The implications of this are considerable and often expensive. In the case of ISS, for example, the power system consists of solar arrays wired in a series-parallel arrangement to give a 160-volt system. Since the main structure of ISS is grounded to the negative end of the array string, the entire space station would float more than 140V negative with respect to the ionosphere. Such potentials are beyond the dielectric strength of the anodized coatings on the ISS aluminum structure, and would lead to arcing into the space plasma and eventual destruction of the ISS thermal control system. This prospect required the addition of an active plasma contactor, a xenon hollow cathode discharge unit, to effectively ground the space station to the ionosphere. As it turns out, the ISS solar arrays are unusual in that they are poor electron collectors due to their welded-through design. Atypically, the ISS early mission-build structure usually doesnt charge more than 20 volts or so negative with respect to the surrounding plasma even without the plasma contactors operating. However, as more solar arrays are put up, it is expected that the charging level on ISS will increase dramatically, justifying the added expense of the plasma contactors.
4.1.2 Sheath Effects
A positive charged spherical electrode will collect electrons when inserted in a plasma. The volume called the sheath, in which the electrode influences electrons, is larger than the sphere. For low voltages, the sheath thickness will be nearly the same as the Debye length (see eqn. 5.2.3.1). Some electrons will orbit around the electrode and escape out of the sheath. The collected or trapped electrons are said to be orbit-limited and are affected in a complex manner by the radius of the electrode, the electrode voltages, and the temperature and density of the free electrons.
A solar array looks to the plasma like a large rod electrode (like the wires and interconnects that are in contact with the plasma) rather than a spherical probe, and is also surrounded by a sheath. Power loss due to plasma leakage current will become significant above 100 V for positive electrodes and is discussed below. Above a threshold voltage, which differs due to array design, arcing may be observed between the electrodes.
Although pictures of damage produced by on-orbit sustained arcs are rare, because most arrays that have arced are not recovered, we do have photos of damage suffered by the ESA Eureca spacecraft that was recovered by the Space Shuttle. Figure 5 shows a sustained arc site on its solar arrays. In this case, the sustained arc eventually burned through the array substrate to the grounded backing, completely shorting the array string to ground.
It was the arcing threat from the ISS anodized aluminum that forced ISS to incorporate the PCUs to control ISS floating potentials. The PCUs act by creating a large localized plasma cloud that makes good electrical contact with the surrounding plasma, and essentially by brute force grounds the ISS structure to the ambient plasma. A generic plasma-contacting device is called a plasma contactor
Most disturbing of all, chromic acid anodized samples for astronaut EMUs were found to break down at potentials of only 60 V, relative to the plasma, with a two-sigma error bar of 10 V. It is thus possible that an astronaut, grounded to ISS by his tether or conductive tools, could undergo an arc at only 50 V. A sneak circuit analysis showed that such arcs could put 1 Amp of current through an astronauts heart. Since 0.1 Amp is enough to cause heart stoppage, it is imperative that if the ISS plasma contactors are inoperable during astronaut EVAs, a method be used to prevent ISS astronaut workplaces from floating more than 50 V negative.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by secretnasaman
reply to JimOberg........
Jim,you don't have this info report by NASA & so you ask me for it & mock me for no link! You give no link as my ATS friend says...
You're the one making the claim the quote is supposed to support. But you're the one finding excuses now not to show the world the link you claim you are quoting correctly but won't allow anyone to check. And you're blaming ME for your own refusal. Priceless.
Originally posted by secretnasaman
Jim...by chopping up quotes into unfairly small sound bites can make anyone sound like a do-nothing dreamer...making your well intentioned aims come into direct conflict with your bludgeon tactics.
Originally posted by ArbitrageurI don't doubt the effects of traveling through the ionosphere, however what I was questioning is if additional static charge might be generated by rubbing non-conductive parts of the suit together like the gloves.
Originally posted by secretnasaman
Jim...by chopping up quotes into unfairly small sound bites can make anyone sound like a do-nothing dreamer...making your well intentioned aims come into direct conflict with your bludgeon tactics.
Originally posted by poet1b
Are you going to visit my plasma thread or what?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I must say That satellite really got toasted but GOOD! wow!
Originally posted by poet1b
Thanks for posting this video, because it shows just the opposite of what you interpret. The particles are all moving very quickly, and almost all of them disappear very quickly, they look nothing like what we are seeing in the tether video.
Originally posted by poet1b
In the second video where ice crystals form on the camera lens, clearly they are not moving, and they look like ice crystals. Most of the UFOs on the tether video look nothing like this. A few do, but that could could easily be due to camera distortion. While camera distortion explains the unreasonable size of some of these UFOs, it clear does not explain their behavior.
"ice crystals form on the camera lens, clearly they are not moving, and they look like ice crystals"
Originally posted by poet1b
Most of the UFOs on the tether video look nothing like this. A few do, but that could could easily be due to camera distortion. While camera distortion explains the unreasonable size of some of these UFOs, it clear does not explain their behavior.