It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yeah and I want to be able to change water into beer.
Have you researched any skeptical sites that offer explanations for the optical effect? Or googled 'STS-75' and my name, for example?
Or do you demand on one-on-one tutorial?
Originally posted by Balez
What are you suggesting here, i am not sceptical?
Originally posted by easynow
and then i said this...
so if ALL the objects are close to the camera as you claim then why don't they ALL show up when the focal length is "short" ?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
never got an answer on that one
So maybe he was suggesting that if you search, you may find what you are searching for. That was the whole point of his post and it seems to have escaped you, or at least you didn't say you ran that search which he suggested.
I'm very well aware that the optical effects could be the explanation for this.
But....
When zoomed in on the tether and you see these little white dots transform into... A mile wide "something" as the believers think.
They get this funny "hollow" centre.
The same thing happens with the tether cable. It gets this "hollowness".
The difference is, the tether is allot longer than, what i believe to be, the debris that is floating with the the tether.
Originally posted by poet1b
The fact that the width of the tether is so out of proportion with its length, as Balez has nicely pointed out, is another major point that the people with this theory that the objects are all floating outside of the shuttle are completely wrong.
debris from a known scheduled water dump
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by JimOberg
debris from a known scheduled water dump
can you post that info on this "scheduled" dump or do we just take your word on it ?
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by JimOberg
debris from a known scheduled water dump
can you post that info on this "scheduled" dump or do we just take your word on it ?
Yes, I can. The question is, why make me the gatekeeper? Why make me your excuse for not finding out these kinds of things yourself before jumping to your mind-stroking conclusions? Or for you making excuses for all the previous proclaimers on this event neglecting to do the simplest of background research on context? What's your excuse for their failure?
you know those dots are stars ? have you matched them up with some known pattern or are you just guessing ?
Maybe you can clear a doubt I have.
Originally posted by secretnasaman
I have the whole mission & I know this water dump is another guess...
hard to finish the materials..yet.
nope, i didn't make extraordinary claims.
therefore, result in our duty, the "debunkers" to deny their ignorance.
Bokeh here. Or how water dump could be the source for what we see.
Originally posted by JimOberg
let me have a try at this...lol
there was no scheduled water dump just prior to the video in question
How can another person verify this? What was the time of the 'video in question' so we can compare it to the 'as-flown' timeline?
If you refuse to provide that time -- or don't know it yourself -- what is the basis of your assertion regarding the absence of the water dump?
can you post that info on this "scheduled" dump or do we just take your word on it ?
Yes, I can.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by JimOberg
Are you blind?
Large parts of the whole video are white washed. The lower right hand corners is completely white washed for a considerable part of the video. The distortion goes way beyond the tether.
AND, as I have pointed out time and time again, there are no particles in the video when the camera moves to the tether, then the white dots appear.
If is was a water dump, we should have been seeing particles the whole time, from the beginning of the video.
Criminy.