reply to post by Angus123
Look, understand what I'm saying here. I dont know if it's a choice or if it's genetic. My point is dont go saying the penguins are gay just
because 2 males decided to take care of an unprotected, fragile egg which was prolly never going to be accepted by any other female. So 2 males decide
to take care of the egg and here comes the "see even penguins are gay so its natural" brigade trying to impose their ideas of "right" to the rest
of the ppl.
I dont care if you're gay man, I'm fine with it as long as you dont impose your "gayness" on me, or force me to think "its alright to be gay" if
I dont, or even push your ideas down my throat forcing me to accept something I dont.
Now lets stop this "animal" comparison because what you are all saying is not completely true. Sure there is homosexuality in "animals" or in
"nature" but there is a difference between animals and humans. Animals are gay until nature calls and they have to do their part to secure the
future of their species... either they change partner and reproduce or they change sex and reproduce. We as humans do neither at least now. Remember
romans and greeks and pretty much all ancient societies... ok, sure they had boy lovers and all that jazz BUT, they still had to have sons and
daughters to secure the future of their bloodlines or of their people. Again, right now we as humans do nothing.
So in my opinion right now, again against that guy using "humanity" and "equality" I just have to say that we cant be equals and you cant speak of
"humanity" since you dont give back the most precious thing Nature gave you which is "life". The more of "you" exist, the less of "us" are
born. You are THE population control...
I think its wrong in your case that you have to go through a situation like that with your family but... I cant really say how would I react if my son
was gay... why? Because he would destroy my legacy... my bloodline would be destroyed by him, of course that I would try to do like the romans and
greeks and go "can you PLEASE at least have sex with ONE GIRL and get her pregnant so we can assure the future of our legacy?" - yes I would
actually make him that proposal... would even pay him.
So human homosexuals are actually the only homosexuals who refuse to give back nature what nature gave them. You can all throw that animal around once
in a while that is natural to be gay and whatever, but if your comparing yourselves with the animal kingdom, well... either you change sex in mating
season or you find a female partner to assure the future of the human species or... you are the most useless homosexuals on earth at nature's eyes.
) how can one argue that an animal is less that a human (which a human is an animal) and has "no
sense of self" yet can still make a cognitive decision to be gay? And if it is unnatural, how is it being produced in nature. 
