Australia to shoot 6,000 kangaroos, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 02:56 PM by on_yur_6
reply to post by jd140



Michigan does what you are talking about. Well at least a group affiliated with Ted Nugent.



reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 04:21 PM by itinerantseeker
reply to post by severdsoul



I'm sorry, but this is the most realistic solution. There has to come a time where you have to choose, us or them, this is nature. The kangaroos don't give a damn about preserving anything for other animals, or humans. No animal does. I have a deep respect for nature and could never hunt for game. I would hunt for survival but that is it. But even I know that populations have to be controlled or you have got a problem that effects everyone. I just hope they don't leave the corpses to rot, that is where I would have a problem. The animal can be used completely. Someone else had posted that it could be used to feed the hungry. Perfect. It does barbaric to shoot them, but the way I see it, it's better than letting them starve to death.


reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 04:23 PM by itinerantseeker
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to
post by pazcat



dude, as mentioned
people need to get off their behinds
sit in a conference room and figure it out

the most impulsive stupid decision is NOT the only one!

It doesn't matter where you live

Are you telling me that if a bunch of think tanks got together, killing 6000 roos would end up being their ONLY option?

I seriously doubt that


Ok and how would you propose going about moving them then? How about you go down there yourself, maybe grab some other like minded individuals and you can grab all 6000 of them and you can figure out what to do with them. Have fun.


reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 04:38 PM by kiwifoot
reply to post by ModernAcademia



Seems to me there's a little contradiction going on here- conservationists are up in arms over a plan to save endagered plants and wildlife. Something's not right there.

But in the end (I won't be popular for this but Oh well) they are just Roos, Oz has millons of them, and even though they are big they are still pests, vermin. You wouldn't be up in arms over 6,000 rats.

They will only suffer if left to starve, and relocating them is truly pointless, there are MILLIONS of them. C'mon people get some perspective here!

In case you wonder where I'm getting my perspective, I'm from NZ and we have problems with rabbits, possums and Pommes(English people) Lol!


reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 04:46 PM by 2theC
Everytime this is announced it receives the same back lash.
I hate to see animals treated with disrespect but we have created this situation in australia over a couple of hundred years and i don't see these short term drastic actions to be a solution. Albeit when the population of kangaroos gets to the point where they cannot survive, what else can we do?

since we invaded, we have altered the natural balance of things here.

The aboriginal people used to hunt kangaroos regularly, we do not.

we have cleared vast tracts of land of its trees making huge perfect environments for the the kangaroos to breed. Kangaroos multiply best in grasslands and we have made them for the sheep and cattle, not to mention increasing the availability of water with dams and troughs.

so we have artificially created a super environment for the Kangaroo but we do not hunt them often enough to keep the balance that was once here( for thousands of years)
people don't want to eat kangaroos because they are cute and on our coat of arms.

so we have a problem of culture change, that requires more than 10 seconds of debate.

where do we start? we missed our biggest opportunity 200 years ago by not learning of the custodians of this land before we quashed them.

i dont know the answer for the short term solution.

(the female kangaroo by the way be pregnant everyday of her mature life, she can 'freeze' her embryo in times of drought and when the conditions are right restart her pregnancy. they are amazing beings.)

[edit on 8-5-2009 by 2theC]


reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 05:36 PM by intrepid
reply to post by matsplat



Well, the Mother country's arrogance shows up. Do a little research into ecology. You may learn that the Roo's were better off being culled as opposed to dying slowly, en masse, of starvation due to their prolific nature.


reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 05:46 PM by 2theC
reply to post by pazcat



aha! it wasn't their choice!
but i cant join in the fun, i have to go to play soccer(football) a british invention apparently, here in, Tasmania,another British invention and i will have to dodge kangaroos and wallabies to get to the highway.
I really hope i don't hit any, its traumatic, really, but thats life in the antipodes.
you can wash your hands of it, its our dilemma but thats ok, freshest air on the planet, cleanest water and its nearly winter and i have a t-shirt on!
thankyou!!!



reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 05:52 PM by pazcat
reply to post by 2theC




Dude i was being sarcastic(i know the net isnt the place), i was actually agreeing with you, i have been there and done all that and will do again.
I hope you didnt think i was having a go at ya im as Aussie as you are.


reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 05:59 PM by 2theC
reply to post by pazcat



sorry cobber!
i thought you were english!!!
i'm the one who should apologise,
and to any english, well you know all is fair...( you guys can take a joke!)

by the way roo meat is very nutritious
and we would do better here if we raised less sheep

apologies again!


reply posted on 8-5-2009 @ 06:15 PM by pazcat
reply to post by 2theC



Dont worry about it mate
Its late here and im a few beers down, im can be hard to get at the best of times.
But you are right it is good for you, this article is a little old and some of the numbers have increased but its all good for you basically.
www.csiro.au...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^