posted on Apr, 25 2009 @ 01:41 PM
Do NOT Take Any Vaccines.
No, I don't think the gubbmint is using a pandemic hoax to corral the population and inject us with experimental HIV mutations or Mark of
the Beast nanites or any of that other conspiracy ca-ca.
The reason I object is because vaccines allow the weakest of our species to survive, when, following natural law, the weakest should be allowed
to die off, thus strengthening the herd.
At present, our total human population is so vastly over-inflated that we are threatening ourselves with extinction, through our extraordinary
consumption and abuse of natural resources, and through our exponentially increased territorial aggression.
The Human species — being fairly large omnivore primates — was never meant to reach a global population in the multiple billions.
Before the advent of immunization technology in just the last 200 years, the total Human population of the Earth numbered only in the hundreds of
millions. After the introduction of reliable immunization technology, the Human population virtually exploded, driving our numbers
into the billions in a single century.
Something is wrong with this. We're throwing off the ecological cycles of the entire planet, threatening other species with extinction,
possibly affecting the Earth's climate with our by-products, and subjecting ourselves to a world of neurotic turmoil as we strive to rewrite
the rules of society to appease every malcontent individual on the planet.
Which will never happen.
What we need — what this whole planet needs — is a corrective "event" to drastically reduce the Human population.
Historically, disease held our numbers in check. At one time, a good plague could be counted upon to wipe out a third of the known
human population (in Europe, for example). First contact of foreign cultures used to be a good way to wipe out one population or the other, also,
either through the spread of alien contagions or through sheer territorial aggression.
But the advance of the medical sciences seriously skewed the natural equation. We now live longer (for no apparent useful reason) and we
enable the weakest among us to not only survive, but to breed and to further dilute the Human gene pool with inborn weaknesses,
both physical and mental.
Does it seem to you as though there are a lot more "crazy" people in the world today? That's because there are. The Human blueprint
is breaking down, we're becoming a less capable species.
Frankly, our Science has filled the planet to brimming with people who, in a stable ecosystem, should not be here. Vaccine technology
carries the great bulk of the blame, but we shouldn't forget to indict the mindset that insists every human life is precious and deserves
all the help we can provide.
NO. That's WRONG. Every human life is not an asset. If we value the continued survival of our species, then we must finally
acknowledge and embrace the fact that quantity does not trump quality. If we seek an ideal quality of Life, then we must
necessarily be prepared to let go of our grossly expanding numbers.
Because there's no way in hell we're going to deliver an ideal quality of Life to our present burgeoning 6 Billion+ human population. Won't
happen in this lifetime or the next or the next. Won't happen ever.
What solution do I propose? Not one that will be either popular or politically correct. Political correctness is a luxury we can no longer
afford, and popularity contests are for brainless teenagers.
Shut down for five years.
Shut. Down. For. Five. Years.
By that I mean America should retreat into isolationism, shut down all food, pharmaceutical and technology exports, sever all diplomatic ties, and
allow all other nations to fend for themselves. For 5 years.
Of course, such extraordinary action would plunge most of the world into anarchy. Chaos. As much as the rest of the planet may hate to admit it, the
USA is THE provider of food, medicine, and essential technologies upon which the others are utterly dependent. Take away the American
breadbasket, medicine cabinet, and toolbelt, and the rest of the world will wither like a severed vine.
What will the world do? Mount an assault to seize our natural resources? The ensuing collision of invading forces, the combined U.S.
Military, and some 80 Million American citizens armed with 280 Million privately-owned firearms would be a holocaust to make the Holocaust seem like a
tea party. Regardless of who "won" (whatever that means), the death toll would number in the millions, America's infrastructure would be
demolished, our capacity for provisioning the world would be crippled for at least 5 years, which would bring us right back to the very reason
for the whole mess...
Shut. Down. For. Five. Years.
So... The world can either play along with our scheme to save the species, or they can try to overthrow us and impose the exact same result upon
I'm guessing they'll just hunker down and suffer through.
Certainly, the most impoverished Third World cultures would begin dying off within weeks of ShutDown. In the first year, starvation and disease will
quite naturally consume great swaths of humanity across Africa, Asia, South America, Central America. It's only reasonable to assume that
there will transpire a thousand mini-wars and border skirmishes, a great deal of genocide, blackmarket traffic in food and medicine, escalated
piracy, et cetera, et cetera.
But, without the USA feeding and caring for everyone, they won't be able to sustain the global conflict for 5 whole years. Things will quite
naturally settle down to a few hoarse, barking voices...and then silence.
By the end of the 5-year moratorium, the face of the world will be very, very different — I'm guessing that, through our deliberate inaction, we
may have assisted Nature to the tune of 2/3 of the human population. About 4 Billion fewer mouths to feed, 4 Billion fewer demands for
political recognition and equality, 4 Billion fewer useless gutbags farting up the atmosphere. The remainder of Humanity will then spread
out to populate and assume control of the "recently vacated" properties all around the globe.
Demands on natural resources cut by 2/3. Carbon emissions profoundly reduced. Drastically fewer international conflicts. New appreciation for Life
worldwide, et cetera. More than anything, we'll see some semblance or Natural Order restored, with the strongest moving on as the weakest
Sure, I know it's a horrible solution for the faint-of-heart out there, because the faint-of-heart are precisely the target of this
exercise. But, if we're serious about Human survival, then we'd better grow some gonads and start taking pandemics on the chin,
allowing Swine Flues and Avian Flues and all the other no-see-ums to do their jobs in the Natural Order, without the shortsighted intervention
of vaccine-toting Scientists promising to extend our lives, offering quantity where there is no quality.
— Doc Velocity
[edit on 4/25/2009 by Doc Velocity]