reply to post by kidflash2008
Here's what I would do:
If I were on the 'inside', and had good quality info. I would find someone like Spielberg (if possible). Then share my story using specific places,
people, details, but switch out the names of individuals, and switch one base's name for another, etc., etc.. Details are written down by a 3rd
party, so that the info. can't be traced back to the leak source.
This info. 'could' include the detailed descriptions inner and underground structures of our top secret facilities that house ET tech, and/or
entities, projects.
The only way to prosecute the 'leaker' in public, if found out, would be to admit that the movie is based in truth. Then again, if the leak is
anonymous, not many people would know if he/she went missing. Perhaps a more public route would provide more physical security.
Going public of course presents a risk that individuals on the inside could decide to begin discrediting you in public. You would have to have some
leverage ahead of time to cover your bases here.
I feel the key here would be to have enough credible info. and storyline to make a good movie out of, and have minimal, or zero 'Hollywood'
interference. If the movie is presented as being 'based on a true story', that gives the audience the option to wonder if they are actually being
educated in truth.
My feeling is that any good director would want to have as much accurate and true storyline as possible. IMO, the truest, most accurate details are
really what would sell the movie to those that want to 'know the truth', as opposed to sub-plot love stories.
Of course, the rouse it that it's all just a 'coincidence'. After all, it's just a movie. We're just telling a 'story' here, right?
[edit on 7-5-2009 by NightVision]