It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
reply to post by Grandma
"Yes, I do believe that he could but he doesn't do anything out of order. There is a order of things as plan if you will. Just as nature renews itself the Lord will renew us. "
That, my good lady, qualifies as a rationalization. If "the Lord" works miracles, why wouldn't he work one so basic?
Originally posted by badmediaIs it not also a rationalization on your part to assume that if they are not being healed, then it does not exist?
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Originally posted by badmediaIs it not also a rationalization on your part to assume that if they are not being healed, then it does not exist?
Why would it be a rationalization? The so-called "God" has the power to do it, if the believers are to be believed. And if a person is "worthy", there's no reason not to do it. Unless, of course, he's not really there.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
reply to post by badmedia
"You live in a world of absolutes that I can't even imagine. And I've showed you the flaws in your way of thinking multiple times.
Sorry if the logic is too complex for you. The fact is that God that doesn't heal amputees because God doesn't exist. Got that?
Originally posted by badmediaWhat if the bible had said that god likes to bruise people and do such things to them. What if it pleases him to see good people suffer, especially at the hand of sinners? Would god then also still no longer exist? Or would that be proof that god does exist?
[edit on 5-5-2009 by badmedia]
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Originally posted by badmediaWhat if the bible had said that god likes to bruise people and do such things to them. What if it pleases him to see good people suffer, especially at the hand of sinners? Would god then also still no longer exist? Or would that be proof that god does exist?
[edit on 5-5-2009 by badmedia]
The god you describe would not be worthy of worship even if he/she/it did exist. But your example doesn't relate to mine, so why did you bother posting it?
Originally posted by badmediaJust can't bring yourself around to answering it? I didn't ask if he would be worth worshiping, I asked if that would be proof. You are basing your "logic" off what people say of god, if what people say of god changes is that in itself proof of god if what they say can be seen?
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
If I wasn't bored I wouldn't bother answering it.
No, it wouldn't be proof, the situation is absurd.
Isaiah 53
10 Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
reply to post by badmedia
Pity you decided to avoid further dialog, but in your situation it's understandable. Quoting the Babble verses is not an response, btw, so you still have one coming.
My question remains unanswered by the respondents to this point. But the answer is there for those with eyes to see. God doesn't heal amputees because God isn't there.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
I've heard people pray to get their limbs back. To Yahweh, Jesus, Allah and a variety of other gods. No joy.
So, if prayer works, why don't limbs grow back?
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Ad homs aside, you are basically saying that I failed to agree with you. That's hardly a telling argument. And, please note, I don't attack a person, but I never hesitate when an idea is just too silly to live.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
I've heard people pray to get their limbs back. To Yahweh, Jesus, Allah and a variety of other gods. No joy.
So, if prayer works, why don't limbs grow back?