It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It has nothing to do woth "sharing" or "the internet being free," what it has everything to do with is scumbag freeloaders who don't want to pay for someone elses hard work, financial outlay, time, and effort.
Originally posted by skibtz
And that is probably at the crux of this debate:
How much should we be paying for movies, music and books et al.
Originally posted by skibtz
Is it right that actors demand $40m per movie?
Originally posted by skibtz
Do we still need the middleman?
But the hackers will scan them from a distance and identity theft ever thing about you your bank accounts your credit cards and even your heath records. Isn't technology wonderful
A digital copy of a product is still a product, and is not free
Originally posted by Power_Semi
What planet do you people live on?
You have absolutely NO right to decide that you're going to share out someone elses property, and I say good riddance that they've been found guilty & sent down.
I personally have penned 2 books, and although you probably think it's a walk in the park to write a book, I can assure you it isn't - months of research, months putting it together, and then marketing it.
It is my livlihood, and what do I find? Some reprehensible little scrote somewhere has decided that's he's going to share my work with other people for free - what the Hell gives him the right to do that?
If you download copyrighted material from torrents then you are a THIEF - PERIOD!
It has nothing to do woth "sharing" or "the internet being free," what it has everything to do with is scumbag freeloaders who don't want to pay for someone elses hard work, financial outlay, time, and effort.
I hope they get the ISPs to log anyone who uses a torrent and fine them all.
The irony is that if every pirated copy of the game had actually been a sale, they would have more than paid the investors off and would still be making great games today.
Profit loss projections based on piracy assumes every person that shares said files would have purchased them if they weren't otherwise available for free.
That is not the case.
Seems to me that an artist making a living through their art ('art' referring to any medium here), whether it be independently or through a publisher/label/whatever/ has a right to actually earn that living.
The product of a talent, freely given at birth, should in no way entitle said talent's bearer to monetary gain. What was originally free should remain always free.
Originally posted by spaznational
The market determines an equilibrium price with supply and demand, which is the point between surplus and shortage. We've all voted with our dollars how much we're willing to pay for a product.
Yes. How dare you tell me or anyone else how much I should be paid. If I can get $40m for my movie, great! If having my name in the marque is going to boost the ticket sales then my value to the company is quantifiable in a dollar amount. Paying me the hypothetical $40m is good business.
It is a dynamic market now with the introduction of downloading, iPods, etc. There's still a middleman, just a different one.
Originally posted by djzombie
A digital copy of a product is still a product, and is not free
Really? So how much does it cost the company that produced said file if I copy and paste it?
There is no physical medium cost to the company when I copy and paste it.
[edit on 17-4-2009 by djzombie]