It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Northern Raider
Slick BTW dont forget I am also a pro gun supporter, but iold enough and wise enough to know something has to change.
Originally posted by big gee
" Do some research and make sure what you post is true. If anyone has evidence of any 'list' or 'legislation' pending before Congress then post it so we can contact our representatives, but please stop posting this crap that just makes people upset for no reason. "
Sorry emsed1. I am not from the US and thought this was a new development. I did not intend to upset anyone.
Originally posted by Northern Raider
2 If they do , how many lives will it save, currently the US loses over 30,000 of its people each year to guns.
Originally posted by verylowfrequency
Originally posted by Northern Raider
2 If they do , how many lives will it save, currently the US loses over 30,000 of its people each year to guns.
I call BS on the over 30,000 people a year. I think somebody's using creative math. That's over 600 people per state per year - I don't buy it. Certainly some of the worst or largest states can manage that number, but there's over 40 states that don't even have 100 gun related deaths a year. That would mean some states have several thousand gun related deaths per year - the only one I can think of that being possible is California, but we don't have a dozen California's. I know in my state nearly every gun death shows up on the News 600 deaths would be everyday on the News and it isn't so. We don't even have that many in the War dying.
In my state there might be a couple hundred deaths at most on a worst year. I think the people who made up those statistics found the state with the most killings in their worst year and the extrapolated it times fifty.
Lies, lies lies and more lies.
I challenge anyone to compile a list of the names of everyone killed in any year of the past 20 years to come up with a list of thirty thousand names. It can't be done cause they don't exist.
Hell even the list of civilian deaths on the entire War in Iraq is less than 30k a year. Iraq Body Count 91,059 – 99,431 violent civilian deaths as a result of the conflict to date.
So according to your numbers there are more gun deaths per year in the U.S. then civilian casualties in the IRAQ war per year. Doesn't make sense because the numbers are BS.
[edit on 13-3-2009 by verylowfrequency]
Of the 1500, you're looking at about 75% young males between the age of 14 and 25 (and getting younger every year), who unintentionally shoot themselves or someone else.
Originally posted by whitewave
Of the 1500, you're looking at about 75% young males between the age of 14 and 25 (and getting younger every year), who unintentionally shoot themselves or someone else.
Originally posted by whitewave
Originally posted by Northern Raider
Of the 1500, you're looking at about 75% young males between the age of 14 and 25 (and getting younger every year), who unintentionally shoot themselves or someone else.
Originally posted by whitewave
Originally posted by Northern Raider
Nup the US govt has no reason to lie, not does the international crime survey,
Number of Deaths Population Crude Rate Age-Adjusted Rate** 29,684 295,895,897 10.03 9.91
Since adopting CCW in 1987 Florida's homicide rate has decreased 21% while the U.S. Rate has risen 12%.