It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Faded.
also,what i dont get is, (if there was) why they skiped the apollo 13 members and details, and we were all told the John Glenn and Neil Armstrong went up to the moon together, but there is no proof on 'google moon' that they did.
The moon is a dead star in our gravitational field.
Originally posted by Faded.
Um...We are only shown the side we can see from earth, we only see one side at all times on earth, anywhere on earth.
also, what i dont getalso,what i dont get is,if there was) why they skipped the apollo 13 members and details, and we were all told the John Glenn and Neil Armstrong went up to the moon together, but there is no proof on 'google moon' that they did.
Also what raises my suspicion, is that they sent a few people to the moon a few years ago, but 1963-1972 were the only times mankind stepped foot on 'another world'. The moon is a dead star in our gravitational field.
Yes, and unlike Google Earth, we have access to the same images, they are publicly available for those that really want to know.
Originally posted by TrueBritWhere the moon is concerned, there are actualy less sources for photographic data involved in its mapping.
Originally posted by Swing Dangler
I would recommend reading Richard Hoagland's Dark Mission for expert analysis of the lunar photographs that have been released. It is ranked 21st on the New York Times Nonfiction list. The tome begins rather slowly and has much technical jargon about hyperdimensional physics but the analysis of the pictures is what grabs you and keeps you reading and wanting more information. It is a must read for anyone researching the subject.
There appears to be overwhelming evidence presented in the book that there are structures that are alien in nature on the moon and this was a major reason for any cover ups regarding lunar mission photographs. The theory suggests they are glass-like in nature and are responsible for many anomolies that can be seen in the photos.
Originally posted by star in a jar
I agree, also, I remember someone saying that the real mysteries were at the dark side of the moon, the side that never faces the Earth.
One side is relatively crater-free, the other side is completely pitted, there, it is said, where the real artifacts are.
I find it strange that our moon does not change its axis position, unlike Earth. It just stays in the same Axis face, ever since it was there.
Can anyone refer me to the best online moon image catalog that is out there? I mean archived RAW multi-mbs files or something?