It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Well, the Chinese just mapped the moon, (or so they claim). Perhaps they'll share their images. As far as artifacts on the moon are concerned, the evidence is shaky at best. IMHO, there's very little to be impressed with.
I'm not saying that there aren't interesting pictures flying about the internet but they are proof of nothing more than suspicion and imagination at this point in time. There's nothing solid to suggest a moon cover-up at all beyond those points.
John Lear hasn't done the cause any favors either... IMHO, he has a really bad case of paraedolia combined with far fetched claims such as spirit catchers and the like.
There will never be enough evidence to satisfy some people that the moon is just a chunk of rocks - but then again, we're discussing this on a conspiracy forum so it's par for the course.
IRM
[edit on 5/3/09 by InfaRedMan]
Originally posted by nasacarl
These UFOs in space seem to be biological entities so as far as a soul catcher on the moon goes , it doesn't seem to far out of whack. After all there's so much we do not know.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Can you give me anything beyond assumption or are you just proving my point that these conspiracies are nothing but assumption/imagination.
IRM
Originally posted by Nventual
Er, right. The close-ups on google earth that you speak of are taken by low-flying aircraft, not satellites.
Originally posted by TheStev
Originally posted by Nventual
Er, right. The close-ups on google earth that you speak of are taken by low-flying aircraft, not satellites.
Not to mention the fact that all of the other imagery on Google Earth comes from the imaging satellites orbiting our planet. As far as I'm aware, we don't have any of the same satellites orbiting the moon. That's not to say that we couldn't, but it's pretty specious to say 'We have these images of the Earth, so we should have them of the moon - therefore they are lying about the moon'
Frankly, I do think there's more going on up there than they're letting us in on. I don't know what, but I do think some things are being withheld. I just don't think your reasoning holds true - certainly not as 'Undebatable PROOF'. After all, if it was undebatable then I wouldn't be here debating it
Originally posted by king9072
Is anyone debating that we have satelites that can see the ground? Way more precisely than even those airline photos. That was my point, and look at the very least they could have the ENTIRE MOON on google moon, instead of just one little spot where apparently every apollo mission decided to land.
Undebatable PROOF that we are not being told everything about the moon